Where is the dirt and rock removed during the construction of the underground FEMA camps? It's a good theory, but I don't think it's possible.
Besides removal of tons of material which apparently went unnoticed, this theory requires workers excavating and building huge underground structures.
True, there are already some underground facilities in various states, but to detain millions you would need multiple bases in every state, requiring
massive underground excavation.
This theory just falls apart too quickly when picked apart. Honestly, I don't even think the "FEMA" camps are what we think they are. They're too
small for mass detainment. Remember Hurricane Katrina? The Superdome was a pretty good example of what will happen in a mass panic situation; people
will be kenneled into stadiums "for their own protection". Camps are too obvious.
The one conspiracy theory about the camps that I could see being true, is that they are places to dispose of bodies. You can't keep thousands of
people locked in those camps, but you can keep millions of people stacked in them.
FEMA CAmps - A New Theory, page 2
privacy
reply posted on 31-1-2012 @ 07:42 PM by fictitious
reply to post by dbarnhart
Good theory, and it certainly sparks some thought. I'm just starting to do some research on fema camps along with other topics regarding the military detention acts.I agree with the idea of them potentially being underground, but at the same time, I think to myself...if masses are being detained, why give them the comfort and advantage of being underground since we relate underground facilities to bunkers made to sustain "high ranking" people from a potential catastrophic event?
I see underground as a safeguard, not a prison. It is an advantage to be underground or in a mountain side, so why waste such a facility on people the government is seeking to bottleneck into an area for surveillance? Wouldn't it be to the advantage of the government to simply let Darwin's "survival of the fittest" to take it's course in an over crowded facility to reduce population? Perhaps this is exactly the plan...to concentrate a population...to "take care" of itself.
I'm very new to ATS, but I am curious to see a plain list of potential camps that actually have some back-up and pictures of more than just one or two locations. Maybe I'm just not doing enough searching.
Good theory, and it certainly sparks some thought. I'm just starting to do some research on fema camps along with other topics regarding the military detention acts.I agree with the idea of them potentially being underground, but at the same time, I think to myself...if masses are being detained, why give them the comfort and advantage of being underground since we relate underground facilities to bunkers made to sustain "high ranking" people from a potential catastrophic event?
I see underground as a safeguard, not a prison. It is an advantage to be underground or in a mountain side, so why waste such a facility on people the government is seeking to bottleneck into an area for surveillance? Wouldn't it be to the advantage of the government to simply let Darwin's "survival of the fittest" to take it's course in an over crowded facility to reduce population? Perhaps this is exactly the plan...to concentrate a population...to "take care" of itself.
I'm very new to ATS, but I am curious to see a plain list of potential camps that actually have some back-up and pictures of more than just one or two locations. Maybe I'm just not doing enough searching.
reply posted on 13-2-2012 @ 09:38 PM by CSBowie
reply to post by LittleVoice731
I would agree, but for a few Issues. When did Humanitarian Aid camps have fences and guard towers> Ive been involved in a couple of NGOs and I dont remember handing out UN health packages behind barb wire. Second, the only time the US has used camps like this was during WW2 to house the Japanese "Citizens". And third, if they didn't exist why would Haliburton win a contract for Logistical support and maintenance for the camps. Of course, I could be wrong and the fences are there to protect Americans from the coming Zombies.
I would agree, but for a few Issues. When did Humanitarian Aid camps have fences and guard towers> Ive been involved in a couple of NGOs and I dont remember handing out UN health packages behind barb wire. Second, the only time the US has used camps like this was during WW2 to house the Japanese "Citizens". And third, if they didn't exist why would Haliburton win a contract for Logistical support and maintenance for the camps. Of course, I could be wrong and the fences are there to protect Americans from the coming Zombies.
BREAKING New Documentary Investigates the Death of Andrew Breitbart
Posted 6 days ago with 93 member flags
Posted 6 days ago with 93 member flags
"CIA are drug smugglers." - Federal Judge Bonner, head of DEA- You don\'t get better proof than th
Posted 1 days ago with 71 member flags
Posted 1 days ago with 71 member flags
Code Name** Stellar Wind. Objective** Infiltrate All. Chances For Sucess** High.
Posted 1 days ago with 64 member flags
Posted 1 days ago with 64 member flags
Wow! Wikileaks Information Dump? Not sure what to make of this location.
Posted 18 days ago with 55 member flags
Posted 18 days ago with 55 member flags
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.036 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.036 seconds
