Originally posted by impressme
reply to post by GoodOlDave
The point is that just because there are areas where information is missing it doesn't give anyone license to fill in the gaps with answers they're manufacturing themselves.
Manufacturing themselves? Dave please demonstrated where they Manufacturing answers?
Second line.
Oh, I'd be happy to- the hijackers were all cavemen, no interceptors were scrambled, Cheney issued a stand down order, all the bomb dogs were withdrawn from WTC, all the Jews working in the WTC stayed home on 9/11, no arab names were on the passenger manifests, noone saw what hit the Pentagon, the Pentagon had anti-aircraft defenses, the planes didn't have any airphones, WTC 7 only had insignificant fires, the list of accusations they're making up to give themselves false credibility goes on and on.
That doesn't include the outright falsification of the hard evidence such as deliberately snipping the collapse of the penthouse from the WTC 7 collapse video to embellish the "controlled demolitions" claims, quote mining James Quintere and snipping off "becuase I think there wasn't enough fire proofing" from his "I don't agree with NIST" quote to falely make it look like he supports these conspiracies, showing photos of WTC support beams cut by acetylene torch and passing it off as proof of controlled demolitions, and the like. I've even seen one guy photoshop a dirt berm in front of the Pentagon to make it look like noone could have seen what hit the Pentagon, even though the dirt berm would have been right in the middle of the highway at the location he placed it.
Keep in mind these aren't simply the paranoid rantings of the ill-informed people posting here. These are stunts the main shakers and movers behind the conspiracy movement are pulling I.E. Morgan Reynolds, Richard Gage, Dylan Avery, Alex Jones, and the like.
