It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ittabena
Oh get real. If you can't see a difference it is only because you don't want to. Besides I wasn't talking to trolls tonight, I was answering the OP's question.
He wanted to know, you don't. Suit yourself. I'm not interested in helping those who don't ask. Better things to do with my time.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by Still
Actually. His net worth is only 5 million.
Considering Huntsman is estimated at 50 million (possibly upwards of 100 million) and Romney's net worth is estimated at around 200 million. Paul's 5 million (rounded up) is pretty humble for a doctor and congressman. That is all of his assets too.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by captaintyinknots
No, using blanket statements to agitate the posters, like calling them "fanatics," is what makes you a troll.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by Still
I never said he wasn't a millionaire?
He is a man in his 70's though and that money is square with what I seventy year old doctor would accumulate in his life. It doesn't reek of corrupt dealings and corporatism.
So, no, you still have no point.
Your response makes no sense. All you have to come back with is to call me a troll because I pointed out what you posted were outright lies?
another person jumping on that, another person missing the point.
Originally posted by WP4YT
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
3)again, I never said no billionairs offered him money, yet you go back to that again. What I said is that graph is irrelevant without qualification. Which it is.
Is the Washington Post a good enough qualification for you?
www.washingtonpost.com...|
They are the ones that made the graph. The sources for the data are Forbes magazine (billionaires list); Federal Election Commission (donor records). The Washington Post. Published on December 5, 2011, 8:01 p.m.edi
t on 29-1-2012 by WP4YT because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by Still
Is there a problem with your reading glasses because that reply is not to you?
He was being called out as a troll too. Stop being oversensitive/brush up on reading comprehension.
Originally posted by Ittabena
reply to post by Still
Oh get real. If you can't see a difference it is only because you don't want to. Besides I wasn't talking to trolls tonight, I was answering the OP's question.
People trolling this thread really got it off track.
I apologize OP.
He asked for why he should vote for Ron Paul and people came in here with nonsense arguments and presented no evidence as to why any of the positive voting points were incorrect.edit on 29-1-2012 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Ittabena
Uh, You did what, where? Because I didn't see where you pointed out anything? All I saw was innuendo, and supposition. When they hire trolls they don't hold out for the bright guys do they?
Originally posted by Dasher
reply to post by captaintyinknots
So, would the answer to this be to continue building debt?
Dr. Paul is suggesting a very difficult concept in which we operate by honesty. It would certainly involve growing pains as we have fallen asleep on our honesty and we all know what happens when we cut-off the circulation to a part of us.
I understand the course Dr. Paul is suggesting will weaken us (America) in a way (relative to our current Imperial standards), but it will strengthen us in ways which are far more crucial to the development of our species as a whole.
So I say directly, just because the task is overwhelming, it does not justify allowing the task to become even more overwhelming.
just embarrassing. Seriously. Get an education.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by captaintyinknots
I would love for you to tell us what you think the point is. I think it is you that is missing it.
The point we have for sharing this info is to give the OP an informed opinion. It is not a rumor, it is fact that Ron Paul is the only candidate that doesn't have billionaire backers and it isn't because he hasn't had the chance.