It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Pleased to see you again, especially since you're making me rethink math problems. Here's how my thinking goes: Kindergarten = Age 5, 1st Grade = Age 6. There are 12 grades, so 12 years. Twelve years and starting at age 6 gives 18? I'm willing to listen to 17, but I don't see it right now.
Like that has ANY CHANCES of passing, not to mention EVEN IF IT DID... won't fix anything.
Obama : states should require kids to stay in school until 18 or graduation
Originally posted by snowspirit
If they're still in school at 18, they've either started late, or failed at least one grade.
I'm assuming the grade system is the same as up here, kindergarden at age 5, grade 12 at 17?
I dropped out myself at 16, and went straight to work. Then went to college later, on a GED.
Some kids just aren't good at staying in school, I appreciated it more when I went back as an adult.
just reinforces that the indoctrination is now going to be a government and legal problem for parents that know that the education system is BS.
Obama : states should require kids to stay in school until 18 or graduation
Originally posted by Still
reply to post by snowspirit
But it is not one more law.
I think it is great that you did go back to school when you were ready. I am a college dropout who went back later so I get that. Maybe both math and US law are not your strongpoints?
Let me ask you this.
How many laws does it take to make the legal drinking age 19?
How many laws does it take to make the legal drinking age 21?
I'm not sure you're right, but it's worth thinking about.
This SHOULD be passed as for one thing, it will CUT down on the government assistance to drop-outs for one thing
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by Vitchilo
Dear Vitchilo,
Always a pleasant surprise to run into you, and a Vitchilo thread is something special.
I agree with you thatIt does allow more years for indoctrination, government control, and increased federal monies taken for "education."
More years of crappy education doesn't fix the crappy education.
You're more optimistic than I am, though.
Like that has ANY CHANCES of passing, not to mention EVEN IF IT DID... won't fix anything.
Why do you think Obama has to get a law passed to put this into effect? He doesn't have to go to Congress at all. I suspect that he will just go to his Secretary of Education and say "In your next batch of regulations, put in that any state that doesn't comply with my idea gets no education funding."
This is why Obama scares me. That, and the idea that the federal government is the place that should have all the money and all the control.
Vitchilo, another thread up to your high standards. Don't know what we peons would do without you.
With respect,
Charles1952
What I apparently should have added to that was that in order to comply with the regulation the state would have to pass a law requiring attendance until 18 or graduation. If the state doesn't pass the law by such and so a date, funding will be cut.
He doesn't have to go to Congress at all. I suspect that he will just go to his Secretary of Education and say "In your next batch of regulations, put in that any state that doesn't comply with my idea gets no education funding."
************THIS PART IS FOR EVERYBODY*************
May I suggest an alternate solution? I will use Math as an example, but the same thing would be done for every subject. Figure out what is needed to have legitimate high school math skills and figure out how to get to those skills. Break that path into 10 parts. As an example, at the end of Part 1, you might have addition and subtraction down cold.
Now, when a student finishes Math Part 1, he goes to Math Part 2. His age doesn't matter, he stays in Part 1 until he's got it, and if he gets it quickly he moves to Part 2 quickly. When you get to Part 10 in all subjects, you're given a diploma, whether you're 13 or 23. Each class would have students of the same ability in it.
This should eliminate boredom because you're moving as fast as you want to. There's also the incentive of "The faster you get it, the faster you're out of here."
I like the idea, but that's because it's mine. Please tell me what you think.
With respect to you all,
Charles1952
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by Vitchilo
This is a state issue. The federal government should never pass a federal law regarding education IMO.
Of course Obama and his handlers would like this. This would be 18 years of federally mandated indoctrination.
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by sligtlyskeptical
Dear slightlyskeptical,
Now that I'm old, my writing skills have deserted me. I can't come up with any other explanation for why we can come to the same conclusion yet you appear to be scolding me. Let me try to straighten this out.
What I apparently should have added to that was that in order to comply with the regulation the state would have to pass a law requiring attendance until 18 or graduation. If the state doesn't pass the law by such and so a date, funding will be cut.
He doesn't have to go to Congress at all. I suspect that he will just go to his Secretary of Education and say "In your next batch of regulations, put in that any state that doesn't comply with my idea gets no education funding."
It's been done before.
Best wishes,
Charles1952
Originally posted by snowspirit
If they're still in school at 18, they've either started late, or failed at least one grade. I'm assuming the grade system is the same as up here, kindergarden at age 5, grade 12 at 17?