It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CaptainNemo
reply to post by jmdewey60
Ok, make your case for Hell. Don't tell me your pastor told you so.
Originally posted by scully222
Originally posted by PurpleSun
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by PurpleSun
"i pray to a God but I don't know his name"
God's name is Jesus.
Do you really think that for millions of years, people never said anything that sounds like what we call today, a J ?edit on 3-2-2012 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)
Wrong!!! God's name is NOT Jesus and if you think that you REALLY don't know your bible at all and show your ignorance. God's name is the most precious tetragrammaton:" יהוה " which closely translates to (YHWH) which Christians pronounce as Yaweh.
The son of the Messiah's name is Yeshua. Never once did he hear the name "Jesus". Not only that, "Jesus" is not a Hebrew name which according to Old Testament Law the Savior must have had as a Jew. Geeze people, you really are brainwashed and do not know facts, do you?
Do you enjoy attempting to make people look stupid? I have read a few of your posts and you are very disrespectful, even as you are claiming not to be. You appear to have a very high opinion of yourself, just don't beat people over the head with it. You are obviously very young, as humility and respect usually come with age. There is a huge difference between knowledge and wisdom. You yourself said "I haven't always been this smart". Maybe someday you will add some wisdom to that massive intellect of yours.
Right and the original text says Jesus, and not some Hebrew or Aramaic name. Jesus was an actual name used by Jews for a long time before Christ so it is not a "translation" it is a name that exists in its own right which is derived from the name we think of today as Joshua.
this is exactly why it's important for people to KNOW what their own bible reads in it's original text and not the "perpetuation of ignorance by the leading authorities throughout time" as you say
. . . Jesus was not a known name.
Originally posted by PurpleSun
BTW, has ANYONE been able to find in the bible where it says that lesbians are a sin? "Man shall not lay with a man as he does with a woman". The argument that " 'man' stands for both men and women" is moot since in Leviticus the laws are specific for men and specific for women and when both are being addressed the word "man" is not used to represent both.
men with men is spoken of in scripture (not that I agree with it's validity since it is not God's word - Leviticus was written by priests as rules for agriculture), and two weeks after first addressing it in this thread i'm still waiting for someone to show me the scripture saying that a woman being with another woman is a sin. if i am wrong, please show me the chapter and verse because i've never read it in the original text. as long as there is no sodomy and a woman is not in a relationship with a married woman, i've been waiting for 10 years to show me the scripture that it is a sin.
Originally posted by PurpleSun
Originally posted by scully222
Originally posted by PurpleSun
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by PurpleSun
"i pray to a God but I don't know his name"
God's name is Jesus.
Do you really think that for millions of years, people never said anything that sounds like what we call today, a J ?edit on 3-2-2012 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)
Wrong!!! God's name is NOT Jesus and if you think that you REALLY don't know your bible at all and show your ignorance. God's name is the most precious tetragrammaton:" יהוה " which closely translates to (YHWH) which Christians pronounce as Yaweh.
The son of the Messiah's name is Yeshua. Never once did he hear the name "Jesus". Not only that, "Jesus" is not a Hebrew name which according to Old Testament Law the Savior must have had as a Jew. Geeze people, you really are brainwashed and do not know facts, do you?
Do you enjoy attempting to make people look stupid? I have read a few of your posts and you are very disrespectful, even as you are claiming not to be. You appear to have a very high opinion of yourself, just don't beat people over the head with it. You are obviously very young, as humility and respect usually come with age. There is a huge difference between knowledge and wisdom. You yourself said "I haven't always been this smart". Maybe someday you will add some wisdom to that massive intellect of yours.
Since you asked, no...I do not enjoy making people look stupid. People show their own ignorance enough and I have a hard time with that since I feel it's a disservice to allow lies through ignorance to be accepted as truth. i don't intend to be disrespectful of others. If one chooses to take my words that way, so be it. I don't intend to be disrespectful and don't intended to make anyone think that I think so highly of myself. I think anyone who knows me would tell you that I am one of the most humble people that they know, however, I'm sure i don't show that through my postings since I get so charged up.
I have not always been so smart, but I have always been this intelligent. The things I share on here, especially about this subject, are the result of my own questions and research that has taken years and years and so I just don't like it when people believe a "fact" about something and don't bother to research it to find out the truth, and then spread the lie as a truth. The fact that my I.Q. is so high also adds another problem....sometimes people with higher thinking functions don't always have the best "people" skills. Add that with my asperger's syndrome and my PTSD/dissociative disorder and it's not always the best recipe for social skills. while i LOVE to debate, i am at fault for being wrapped up in it too much. i just don't want people to misunderstand that when I say "ignorance" it is not a bad word..it simply means not educated about something. i'm ignorant about tons of things while i try not to be. If anyone takes offense to being called ignorant, that's probably because they don't know what the word really means or because they are listening while defending themselves for some reason.
there is a great saying i was told when I was 12 about how I am: "speak without offending, listen without defending". I hope I can do that as I grow older (as you said).
I don't think of myself in high regards except when it comes to my intellect and my bloodline and being someone that the ones i love can count on (not that my bloodline means anything, I'm just pretty proud of it). i do try to be humble and have humility, it's just that the way i communicate doesn't seem to reflect it as my communication skills need work on all fronts.
so with that, thank you. and again, if i have made anyone feel bad, it sincerely is not my intention. maybe i'll even add it to my profile as a disclaimer. my only intention is to provide facts or my opinion and sometimes i have a very hard time not seeing how other people can't see things as common sense (i.e. "common sense is not so common" as with the discussion fo the letter "J" as it relates to the name of the messiah). i do hope that i gain wisdom with my intellect. it would help out a ton in soooooo many ways. so thanks for that.
Originally posted by scully222
Define "acceptance". Does acceptance for you mean you can throw your sexuality in someones face and they don't even recoil a little? Do they need to cheer for your acceptance? I got news for you. If I threw my sexuality in someones face I would expect them to recoil. It's a natural response for "too much information!". I would also expect the gay community to call me names and maybe even force me to publicly apologize. You've proven this to a tee. Being gay today is not a private experience between two lovers like you proclaim(Just leave us alone!). The gay experience today is a very public display that begins with the "coming out" and continues with protests, Pride Parades, lobbying groups, an "exclusive" community, special laws for special protections, etc. These are all displayed for everyone to see. Someone that wants to be left alone does not create a 3X4 sign that is sometimes vulgar and parade around the street half naked. There is A LOT more going on here than wanting to be left alone. When was the last time you heard of a straight man telling all of his friends, posting on Facebook, posting on Twitter, that he was STRAIGHT and liked to sleep with WOMEN. You and all your friends would tease him and call him names. Heck, I would join you. I would ask him if he wanted a medal or a chest to pin it on. Why? Because the whole idea is just silly. Why would anyone of any sexual leaning feel the need to publicly proclaim their orientation? I'll tell you why. It is required to get into the CLUB. Sexuality is meant to be a private experience, like dozens of posters have stated on this thread(pro and con). Why should homosexuality be any different? This may shock you, but I have no problem with anything anyone does in the PRIVACY of their own bedroom. The problem today is that it is not private, it is VERY VERY PUBLIC. Someone that wants to be left alone goes about their business and keeps a low profile. They are comfortable in their own skin and feel no need to call attention to themselves. Most gays today are so full of themselves it borders on the obnoxious. They will stop at almost nothing to call attention to themselves and totally bash anyone that disagrees(again, thanks for proving my point). Someone that is screaming from the rooftops is not looking for acceptance, they are looking to RULE!
Originally posted by Amadeo
Originally posted by scully222
Define "acceptance". Does acceptance for you mean you can throw your sexuality in someones face and they don't even recoil a little? Do they need to cheer for your acceptance? I got news for you. If I threw my sexuality in someones face I would expect them to recoil. It's a natural response for "too much information!". I would also expect the gay community to call me names and maybe even force me to publicly apologize. You've proven this to a tee. Being gay today is not a private experience between two lovers like you proclaim(Just leave us alone!). The gay experience today is a very public display that begins with the "coming out" and continues with protests, Pride Parades, lobbying groups, an "exclusive" community, special laws for special protections, etc. These are all displayed for everyone to see. Someone that wants to be left alone does not create a 3X4 sign that is sometimes vulgar and parade around the street half naked. There is A LOT more going on here than wanting to be left alone. When was the last time you heard of a straight man telling all of his friends, posting on Facebook, posting on Twitter, that he was STRAIGHT and liked to sleep with WOMEN. You and all your friends would tease him and call him names. Heck, I would join you. I would ask him if he wanted a medal or a chest to pin it on. Why? Because the whole idea is just silly. Why would anyone of any sexual leaning feel the need to publicly proclaim their orientation? I'll tell you why. It is required to get into the CLUB. Sexuality is meant to be a private experience, like dozens of posters have stated on this thread(pro and con). Why should homosexuality be any different? This may shock you, but I have no problem with anything anyone does in the PRIVACY of their own bedroom. The problem today is that it is not private, it is VERY VERY PUBLIC. Someone that wants to be left alone goes about their business and keeps a low profile. They are comfortable in their own skin and feel no need to call attention to themselves. Most gays today are so full of themselves it borders on the obnoxious. They will stop at almost nothing to call attention to themselves and totally bash anyone that disagrees(again, thanks for proving my point). Someone that is screaming from the rooftops is not looking for acceptance, they are looking to RULE!
Forgot about this thread and missed this little gem of a reply.
To summarise your rant: gay people should just shut up because, in your eyes, when gay people shout from the rooftops about wanting acceptance, it means they actually want to take over the world. Yes?
NO. Gay people shout it from the rooftops because of the loony religious types who want to persecute us and wipe us from the face of the earth. As long as they are doing that, we will be fighting right back. As I've previously said, don't give out what you can't take back.
You can spin and twist my words as much as you like but don't worry, I'll be around to correct until you finally get it through your skull.
Originally posted by CaptainNemo
reply to post by Amadeo
You weren't talking to me, but I saw the word acceptance in your reply above mine, so I interjected.
Read my reply again, read it S L O W L Y.
It's actually really simple and understandable.
BTW by genetic cruch, I mean the the lie that Homosexuals are born gayedit on 12-2-2012 by CaptainNemo because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Amadeo
Originally posted by CaptainNemo
reply to post by Amadeo
You weren't talking to me, but I saw the word acceptance in your reply above mine, so I interjected.
Read my reply again, read it S L O W L Y.
It's actually really simple and understandable.
BTW by genetic cruch, I mean the the lie that Homosexuals are born gayedit on 12-2-2012 by CaptainNemo because: (no reason given)
I don't need to read your BS again, once was enough for me to know you're talking crap. Same with 'gays not being born gay' thing. How the hell do YOU know? I can say with absolute certainty that I was born gay and you're in no position to say otherwise. Consider yourself and your ridiculous arguments thoroughly dismissed.