It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Breathing Chemtrails is bad for your health

page: 3
8
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 28 2012 @ 08:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by FissionSurplus
reply to post by network dude
 


Bottom line: I've seen contrails, as I used to live by DFW airport. I've also seen chemtrails. They are different, they look different, they act different, and I know what I've seen.


What is different about the way they look or act?




posted on Jan, 28 2012 @ 08:18 PM
link   
reply to post by COconspiracyguy
 


Be sure to let us know how those lawsuits go.

And why are you linking to a chemistry manual?

The subject here is chemtrails, not chemistry.

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Jan, 28 2012 @ 08:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by COconspiracyguy
 


And why are you linking to a chemistry manual?



Umm, because Chemtrails contain chemicals.



posted on Jan, 28 2012 @ 08:35 PM
link   
reply to post by COconspiracyguy
 


...and that manual contains nothing about chemtrails



posted on Jan, 28 2012 @ 08:35 PM
link   
reply to post by COconspiracyguy
 


So does everything else.



posted on Jan, 28 2012 @ 08:37 PM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 


How do you know, you read it?



posted on Jan, 28 2012 @ 08:43 PM
link   
reply to post by COconspiracyguy
 


Have you?

If you had, you wouldn't be spruking it as some sort of evidence for chemtrails.



posted on Jan, 28 2012 @ 08:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by COconspiracyguy
 


Have you?

If you had, you wouldn't be spruking it as some sort of evidence for chemtrails.


I asked you first.



posted on Jan, 28 2012 @ 08:52 PM
link   
reply to post by COconspiracyguy
 


I believe the burden of proof lies upon you my friend, when pressed, no chemmy has been able to produce a scan of the incriminating pages, yourself included it seems...

So you're either extremely gullible and will believe anything that confirms your beliefs without questioning it, or you are knowingly posting disinformation.



posted on Jan, 28 2012 @ 08:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by COconspiracyguy
 


I believe the burden of proof lies upon you my friend, when pressed, no chemmy has been able to produce a scan of the incriminating pages, yourself included it seems...

So you're either extremely gullible and will believe anything that confirms your beliefs without questioning it, or you are knowingly posting disinformation.


Let's just put if this way, lawsuits don't get filed without proper evidence..

I find it odd that you seem to know whats in the manual, like you've read it.

If you have a copy, please, do tell.



posted on Jan, 28 2012 @ 09:01 PM
link   
reply to post by COconspiracyguy
 


On the contrary, it seems you had enough belief in the manual being proof of chemtrails to post a link to it, so please, do share how you've come to this conclusion.



posted on Jan, 28 2012 @ 09:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by COconspiracyguy
 


On the contrary, it seems you had enough belief in the manual being proof of chemtrails to post a link to it, so please, do share how you've come to this conclusion.


Due to ongoing legal activities, I'm not at liberty to divulge that info. You'll just have to wait and see.

Your condescending tone is offensive.



posted on Jan, 28 2012 @ 09:13 PM
link   
reply to post by COconspiracyguy
 


You're not at liberty to divulge the information of a book that is available to buy online?

I've heard it all now!

Go away troll



posted on Jan, 28 2012 @ 09:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by COconspiracyguy
 


You're not at liberty to divulge the information of a book that is available to buy online?

I've heard it all now!

Go away troll


If you can buy it, be my guest.



posted on Jan, 28 2012 @ 09:28 PM
link   
reply to post by COconspiracyguy
 


Available at the national library of Australia...

catalogue.nla.gov.au...

You should send them a cease and desist for having a copy of evidence that you're not at library to divulge.



You must take me for a moron if you think I cant see through your bs...



posted on Jan, 28 2012 @ 09:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by COconspiracyguy
 


Available at the national library of Australia...

catalogue.nla.gov.au...

You should send them a cease and desist for having a copy of evidence that you're not at library to divulge.



You must take me for a moron if you think I cant see through your bs...



Let me explain something to you, since your Australian.The government only gives this type of document to what they call "depository libraries". These depository libraries hold US govt document for a certain period of time, per US law.

They are not for sale, So, in a million years, you will NEVER purchase one. Do you understand?

PS,. You have insulted me twice.
edit on 28-1-2012 by COconspiracyguy because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 28 2012 @ 11:40 PM
link   
reply to post by COconspiracyguy
 


This is ridiculous, yet again.

You are banging on about the USAF Academy chemistry course handbook. It has been discussed to death, here on ATS.

The term "chemtrails" used in that course guideline is a play on words....they keep it in there because it is funny!

But of course, gullible people think that it means something else.....it makes it all the more funny, that way!



posted on Jan, 29 2012 @ 04:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by COconspiracyguy

They are not for sale, So, in a million years, you will NEVER purchase one. Do you understand?



So what about this guy then - is he a million and 1 years old??





posted on Jan, 29 2012 @ 04:43 AM
link   
The super duo ProudBird and Aloysius the Gaul strike again!

edit on 29-1-2012 by User8911 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 29 2012 @ 04:48 AM
link   
reply to post by User8911
 


So, did they post something that was wrong? This constant reference to members because they are here, rather than tackling what they say, is becoming tiresome and is a clear indication that the Chemtrailers actually have nothing to come back with.

I think some Americans sum it up as "epic fail" do they not?




new topics

top topics



 
8
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join