*Do you remember when contrails were contrails, and the sky never got tic tac toe'd?*, page 8


Pages: <<  5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 26 times


reply posted on 31-1-2012 @ 07:15 PM by tsurfer2000h
reply to post by waynos



Here is a good picture for you from a different perspective...



Don't see that view to often do you?



reply posted on 31-1-2012 @ 07:29 PM by tsurfer2000h
reply to post by Uncinus



Thanks for that.Yes you were right I did like it.

second


reply posted on 31-1-2012 @ 07:47 PM by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by Uncinus



I see donut contrails being formed - this is the secret of Aurora!!

donut contrails, triangular aircraft - Sweeeeeeeet!
edit on 31-1-2012 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 31-1-2012 @ 07:51 PM by DerepentLEstranger
reply to post by pshea38



LOL
i mean, dude, how many times
are we gonna go over simple definitions?

enough is enough


reply posted on 31-1-2012 @ 07:58 PM by DerepentLEstranger
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to
post by pshea38



If one could at least get the phrase correct.....but, there is so much DIS- and MIS-information out there, and provided by the con-artists (and then accepted and swallowed by the gullible).....

.....Here.....the actual phrase is "Toe" the line

Read it and weep....for the death of knowledge, and the rise of ignorance........


that is merely your opinion, young man

still haven't read that link i see or the post itself:

Unsurprisingly, however, though, there are those who seek to oppose the assertions of those who contend that chemtrails are abnormal, and should be stopped. Apparently calculatedly, they term themselves "debunkers", to inculcate the perception that concern over chemtrails is, more than "misguided", an out-and-out hoax or fraud! Indeed, a number of them have used the term "hoax" in describing the concern over chemtrails - evidently suggesting that those who address the issue are actually pulling a prank on themselves - and even accused some who pursue the issue of doing it purely for personal profit.

As if someone choosing to try to make a profit off a situation suddenly makes that situation not exist.

Many have tried to hawk fake nostrums to eliminate the symptoms of the common cold, but that doesn't make the common cold nonexistent. Moreover, the "debunkers" regularly tout the software, Flight Explorer, to "identify" aircraft using routes where chemtrails form. Not only do they, apparently, wish to negate the existence of chemtrails by simply calling them contrails, they seem to want to convince the public that they arise from innocuous, harmless aircraft simply because unidentified, unverified information a piece of software displays on a screen says it does.

They try to "counsel" people against using the guidance of their eyes and their common sense in chemtrails; they, instead, apparently, want them to blindly obey "the official story".

Indeed, such faulty "reasoning", coupled with an attitude of guile and contempt, seems universally to characterize the chemtrail debunkers.




the death of knowledge, and the rise of ignorance, indeed


reply posted on 31-1-2012 @ 08:04 PM by DerepentLEstranger
reply to post by Uncinus



LOL from a station owned by GE
and which has been caught regularly covering up stuff related to GE's Nuclear power investments

why should i believe what a known propaganda outlet says?


reply posted on 31-1-2012 @ 08:25 PM by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by DerepentLEstranger
reply to
post by Uncinus



LOL from a station owned by GE
and which has been caught regularly covering up stuff related to GE's Nuclear power investments

why should i believe what a known propaganda outlet says?


What does it say that is wrong, and how do you know it is wrong?


reply posted on 31-1-2012 @ 09:35 PM by DerepentLEstranger
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by DerepentLEstranger
reply to
post by Uncinus



LOL from a station owned by GE
and which has been caught regularly covering up stuff related to GE's Nuclear power investments

why should i believe what a known propaganda outlet says?


What does it say that is wrong, and how do you know it is wrong?


www.youtube.com...

known since the 70's
but hey, continue to believe in everything you read in Le Monde

more nit picking and derailment

NEXT!



reply posted on 1-2-2012 @ 11:44 PM by Uncinus
Originally posted by DerepentLEstranger
reply to
post by Uncinus



LOL from a station owned by GE
and which has been caught regularly covering up stuff related to GE's Nuclear power investments

why should i believe what a known propaganda outlet says?


But why would they be saying that in the 1980s?

Plus, the actual research on which the report was based was nothing controversial, and is consistent with all recorded science, everywhere.


reply posted on 4-2-2012 @ 04:36 AM by tommyjo
Originally posted by JRockABM
Still nobody has posted CHEMTRAIL photos of CHINA, RUSSIA, or IRAN.

Showing thin clouds is not enough!

I want to see the grid, tic-tac-toe patterns, the obvious THICK WHITE CLOUDY trais that we all are used to seeing here in the states!

Google image search, message random people on facebook and ask them, become little investigators that can TRULY debunk this!

I know you can't, because I've already tried! Both in person, and through reaching out to contacts I have all over the world.

This is the one factor that cannot be explained!

Oh well. I'll wait until another thread pops up...and keep asking this question until it REALLY ANSWERED!




No contrails over Iran (Seriously!), but Iran is 'spraying' Europe?

www.skystef.be...

It's a conspiracy, I tell you!

Seriously? You haven't searched very hard for Russia! I don't speak Russian, but even I can work out from internet searches the following.

'Himiotrassy' and 'Himtreyly'

See following videos and video links.

'Himtreyly in Orel'



'Himtreyly over St. Petersburg'



'Chemtrails spraying. January 29 2012. Moscow, Russia. 29.01.2012'



Links to the rest of the videos.

'Chemtrails and strange clouds. September 24 2011. The Moscow Region, Russia.'

www.youtube.com...

'Chemtrails. August 13 2011. The Moscow Region, Russia.'

www.youtube.com...

'Chemtrails go crazy in Moscow ( 18 october 2011)'

www.youtube.com...

'Chemtrail in Russia!'

www.youtube.com...

'Chemtrails May 24 2011 Moscow, Russia. Himiotrassy Moscow 24.05.2011'

www.youtube.com...

'Chelyabinsk Himtrassy 03/12/11'

www.youtube.com...

'Himtreyl of Samara'

www.youtube.com...

'Himtreyly over Moscow panoramic photo'

www.youtube.com...

'Himtreyly - 29.01.2012 (Moscow)'

www.youtube.com...

'Himtreyly in Rostov-on-Donu.mp4'

www.youtube.com...

'Chemtrails Nizhny Novgorod 26.01.2011 8h25m.flv'

www.youtube.com...

'Himtreyly in the country, near Serpukhov - 92km from Moscow'

www.youtube.com...

www.youtube.com...

'Chemtrails on Moscow, the May 2011'

www.youtube.com...

'Moscow is under attack (himiotrassy)'

www.youtube.com...

'CHEMTRAIL February 2011 (Part 1)'

www.youtube.com...

'Sochi himtreyly'

www.youtube.com...

Stop listening to nuts on the web that are spinning DVD and books for the gullible. Persistent contrails form in Russia, Iran and China exactly as they do in other parts of the world.
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



NOAA Doc Strong Evidence They Are and Have Been Spraying Us
  Posted 15 days ago with 36 member flags
Chemtrail Programs Only Cost Us $5 Billion a Year
  Posted 5 days ago with 8 member flags
Cost analysis of aerosol solar radiation management published
  Posted 11 days ago with 6 member flags
How do elites escape chemtrails?
  Posted 1 days ago with 5 member flags
ChemTrails over Michigan
  Posted 11 days ago with 3 member flags
Geo-engineering (Chemtrails) and Bible Prophecy
  Posted 15 days ago with 2 member flags