It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JRockABM
Tell me why Russia, Iran, and China do not have this same problem.
Check. Mate.
edit on 29-1-2012 by JRockABM because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by waynos
reply to post by Captain Beyond
But how can someone reliably draw a conclusion from what they arelooking at if there is a big hole in their understanding of what they are looking at? that's just guessing, isn't it?
For example, one can hardly correctly deduce that a trail cannot be a contrail because it has been there for two hours and spread if one is unaware that this is something contrails do. The logic is flawed.
As one that does not just follow the crowd, what was it that made you sure that you were looking at something that was not a contrail?
For myself, I don't think that chemtrails are impossible, far from it. I just think that nobody has reliably or convincingly shown that chemtrails are really out there and all of the logic so far posted about WHY they believe them to be chemtrails has been flawed, along the lines I used as an example.
So I'm sceptical, but still looking out for that killer sign. Someone may well try or do it one day, just not yet.edit on 28-1-2012 by waynos because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Captain Beyond
I have seen jets flying in tandem or more, and there will be a large trail behind the planes, and then all of a sudden, it just stops? Like someone turned off a valve or something. If it was a contrail, wouldn't it continue behind the planes? Don't you find that strange? I have been logging the times and dates I see them. I don't know what I will gain from this data, but I will continue to do it.
Originally posted by dawnprince
We don't need to get together
because at the end of the day , anybody with an ounce of common sense knows that chemtrails are just an internet myth , perpetuated by boys in anoraks .
Peace
It's pretty obvious what their agenda is. Pay them no mind.
Excellent and Spot on Jrock. This is about Central Banking and the NAZIS.
Originally posted by Drew99GT
They don't have this "problem" like the rest of the world doesn't have this "problem", because IT'S NOT A PROBLEM. They don't have armchair internet conspiracy nutjobs filling the minds of gullible people with rubbish (although their governments do a fine job of that).
Russian and Chinese citizens aren't out filming contrails like Americans are. That's why there's so little video and pictures from those countries.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by Captain Beyond
I have seen jets flying in tandem or more, and there will be a large trail behind the planes, and then all of a sudden, it just stops? Like someone turned off a valve or something. If it was a contrail, wouldn't it continue behind the planes? Don't you find that strange? I have been logging the times and dates I see them. I don't know what I will gain from this data, but I will continue to do it.
It will stop as soon as conditions are no longer suitable for contrail formation.
Have a look at a cloud - it has edges - beyond those edges the conditions are not right for cloud formation, and so there is no cloud. Sometimes those edges can be quite sharply defined, sometimes they are fuzzier - but they are always there somewhere.
Same with contrails - atmospheric conditions are everything.
A phenomenon that chemtrail followers also point to to indicate the suspicious nature of the trails is what is termed the "on and off switch". Often, when chemtrails appear overhead, there will be a space in the trail, where what seems to be aerial spraying was turned off, for a time, then turned back on.
This does not happen, ever, for conventional contrails. Planes forming the short tails of contrail fog behind them do not go through periods when the cloud will disappear; the clouds themselves, even though they last for a short time, do not show spaces in them. Debunkers, unsurprisingly, dismiss these claims, insisting that there is nothing in the breaks in chemtrails that indicate anything out of what they term the usual.
Tellingly, though, actual addresses of the issue of the "on off switch" are rare on debunker websites. In fact, only one site, www22.brinkster.com/Seawana/Conspiracies/Chemtrails.asp, which boasts the title, "The Way of the Dodo", actually devotes any real space to an attempted "explanation" of chemtrail breaks.
In characteristically contemptuous and insulting fashion, the section begins, "Ah yes. These rare photos are a favorite among the believers." The originator of the site, who identifies himself as Skip Ernst, describes "the neanderthals running" spray operations as having "mistakenly turned off the spray for a few moments".
"Can you believe the government has hired a bunch of bumbling idiots to perform their top secrets operations?", Mr. Ernst adds, mockingly.
He posits that the breaks are caused by jets having "simply passed through a pocket of air where contrails" - carefully, he doesn,t refer to them as "chemtrails"! - "will not form. The air could be too warm or too dry to form the ice crystals which make a contrail visible."
It is eminently unlikely, if not patently impossible, that air that high up would be so warm, to begin with. The jets that form chemtrails typically fly at at least three miles high. Even if it was too warm, a trail, of sorts, of water vapor would be likely, following the jet. And, even if the air were very dry, a trace of the ice crystals from the jet engines, that supposedly form the "seed" for the chemtrail, should be visible, and it is not.
And that is leaving aside, entirely, the fact that there is little reason to believe that an isolated, tiny, patch of air could be so radically different from the overwhelming mass of air around it! If an area of warm or dry air were to intrude, it is likely that it would be no time before the rest of the air around it would bring it into equilibrium.
Originally posted by DerepentLEstranger
the link i posted is a catalogue of chemtrail debunking tactics and sources, debunked.
Instead of the normal kind of contrails, usually accredited to jet aircraft, which stretch for a short distance behind the tail of the jet, and dissipate, as the sun warms and evaporates the ice crystals in the tails, these would stretch, generally, from horizon to horizon.
Originally posted by DerepentLEstranger
attacking the messenger is a shill tactic, doesn't matter if you're being paid or are merely a system justifier
that is not debunking, or proper science
Originally posted by DerepentLEstranger
why waste my valuable time
on pseudo-disingenuous nit-picking or any other tactics
designed to keep people running around in circles.
Originally posted by DerepentLEstranger
instead of disproving any of that or the video, you want to go back to the beginning and define chemtrail
as if you didn't know the difference between contrails and chemtrails by now...