reply to post by J.Son79
I hear what you are saying, but honestly, the way we seem to do things now, first you would have the fly over, possibly something as a drone that
flies over and when Iranian radar hits it, it is mapped and targeted for destruction, a second drone flies in and destroyed the pinged target, after,
a bomb is dropped on said target, then if they feel it is not enough, another bomb, or drone/both. Air superiority is not a problem, and actually,
neither are surface to air missiles, unless like I said earlier, they have something we do not know about.
Now this is just speculation from someone who has never been in the military and likes to play armchair general, but it seems logical to me, from what
I have seen the US military do and how they appear to operate, at least from what I see on tv and read.
Iraq is a good example.
All surface to air missiles or anything that targeted a US aircraft was destroyed with seconds/minutes.
They never had a chance to fight back. Now I am not saying it would be a cakewalk, in fact, we all know it will not, but I do think Iran could not
win, and it would be a fairly fast war with minimal US casualties.
At least the main part of the war, which would be to destroy Iran's military machinery and take out their nuclear weapons/reactor projects.
I am not for a war with Iran, just saying I do have a lot of faith in US military superiority.