It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Breaking: LAX FEMA Rendition Site Confirmed

page: 1
33
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+7 more 
posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 08:35 PM
link   

Breaking: LAX FEMA Rendition Site Confirmed


www.prisonplanet.com

January 27, 2012

Alex presents newly exposed footage filmed at LAX airport in Los Angeles confirming a ‘rendition hub’ capable of processing thousands of people per hour from straight off the tarmac and other transportation points.

Further, Alex dredges up video clips of other facilities used in the past for mass containment of dissenters- from Pier 57 in New York City used to detain those rounded-up during mass arrests at the 2004 Republican National Convention to the former Mueller Airport facility in Austin which news clips exposed had been converted to hold mass arrestees to the
(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www.prisonplanet.com

Related AboveTopSecret.com Discussion Threads:
"The sports facilities are the detention/relocation camps..." ?




posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 08:35 PM
link   
Guaranteed the majority of the responses this will get will be about how people don't like alex jones.
NOBODY cares what you think of him or his websites, look at what he's covering.

The videos include clips showing mainstream news sources covering similar facilities and admitting that they're to hold prisoners, so if you deny that they exist, YOU'RE the crazy person.

The pictures of the one at LAX are towards the middle/end of the first video.




www.prisonplanet.com
(visit the link for the full news article)



posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 08:39 PM
link   
NDAA Anyone?

I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations. ~James Madison



posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 08:52 PM
link   
I have never really been on board with the whole "FEMA Camp" thing.
Too much conflicting information, too much inconsistency. But it always seemed way too logical to be a hoax, for me.

Once I have some free time in the next few days, I will be sure to watch this.



posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 09:07 PM
link   
I'm not a huge fan of AJ's show..

That is some pretty serious info.

Just WOW.. and whats even creepier, it's true, at least the previous events, they have used sites to hold "Protesters".

The LAX thing is the icing on the cake..

Need to dig up the link and see what my state has.. /shudder



posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 09:21 PM
link   
Wht is strange about the Govt having contingency plans for handling thousands of refugees from disaster??


Y'all complained about the screw ups after Katrina - now you are complaining hat something is being done to try to avoid those screw ups next time??

That's just weird!



posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 09:29 PM
link   
You're ridiculous. One of the "screw ups" during katrina was the way they treated a huge number of their prisoners...I mean "refugees." We're not complaining about them helping people, genius, we're complaining about the fact that they did something bad and aren't just still in power, but are getting more and more of it all the time.

You either didn't watch the video, or you're just ignoring the fact that the sites talked about weren't used for any kind of disaster, they were used to round up protestors and drunk drivers.
edit on 27-1-2012 by 1825114 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 09:42 PM
link   
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
 


Nice,right?




posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 09:57 PM
link   
reply to post by 1825114
 


Sorry to spoil the "fun", but that's just AJ being his typical fear-mongering con-artist self.

Even while his ignorance shows clearly (about mid-way, the "story" about "Pier 57" has the tagline title "Marshall Plan...er, Law" captioned at the bottom. He and his staff look like uneducated buffoons.

He assembled a barrage of various local TV News clips, taken out of context, and concocts this fantasy claim, yet again.

Heck one of the clips even had the female reporter on location talking about the "Y2K" revelers!!! How hilarious!! A clip from 1999 being used to "scare" people.

Humorous, but pathetic at the same time.......because people buy into his hogwash.
edit on Fri 27 January 2012 by ProudBird because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 10:00 PM
link   
reply to post by 1825114
 


ok - to address the LAX claims ,

the ` witness ` revealed that the new fence was essentially identical to all other LAX perimeter fencing , which leads me to the conclusion that expansion program is a more likley reason than " fema rendition hub "

also - turnstiles ? , turnstiles and uncoperative people / prisoners simply do not work , look at any prison - the only turnstiles you see are in the staff areas / entrances and the visitors entrances

turnsties are perfect for hi security areas - like gosh airports
- as they can n be protected by key / pin security , log traffic and cannot be ` left open `

they simply do not work for an uncoperative intake



posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 10:07 PM
link   
people at occupy places need to get out now, look at this set up.. posters on ATS were ridiculed for suggestion that this would be a trap, its looking like it was true all along. Welcome to the beginning of the Fema Camps in action

i feel sorry for everyone that gets put into one



posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 10:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by 1825114
 


Even while his ignorance shows clearly (about mid-way, the "story" about "Pier 57" has the tagline title "Marshall Plan" captioned at the bottom. He and his staff look like uneducated buffoons.

He assembled a barrage of various local TV News clips, taken out of context, and concocts this fantasy claim, yet again.

what EXACTLY is so fantastical about the claims he made?

en.wikipedia.org...

Police tactics and Pier 57

Concerns have been raised about police tactics in arresting nonviolent protesters with many apparently innocent people being swept up in mass arrests.

Guantanamo on the Hudson was a term coined during the Republican National Convention by a lawyer who, amongst 1000 other people, was detained in a facility by the New York City Police, in such conditions that he said that the city had created its "own little Guantanamo on the Hudson" (an allusion to the tortures reported in prisoners camps in Guantanamo).

The City police closed a street adjoining Union Square where protesters were marching, arresting protesters and bystanders alike. People were required to show identification cards or face arrest; the arrested people were not immediately informed of charges against them.

The facility was the then-recently closed Hudson Pier Depot at Pier 57 on the Hudson River in Manhattan, a three-story, block-long pier that has been converted into a temporary holding facility, though unfit for detention of prisoners. Arrested protesters have complained about extremely poor conditions describing it as overcrowded, dirty, and contaminated with oil and asbestos. People reported having suffered from smell, bad ventilation, and even chemical burns and rashes.

Numerous troubling cases were reported, notably:

- A 15-year-old diabetic girl on her way to a movie was arrested.[42]
- A former vice president of Morgan Stanley was arrested while riding her bicycle.[42]
- A 16-year-old protestor was lost to her mother for two days, even though her mother knew about and supported her daughter's participation.[43]
- Small pens were used to contain "30 to 40 people" at once.
- Many people were detained longer than 24 hours on relatively trivial charges. One was a 23-year-old Montreal student arrested for disorderly conduct and released three days later. "He says he spent a total of 57 hours between the pier and Central Booking, during which time he says he was moved 14 times and repeatedly handcuffed and shackled to other protesters as young as 15."

The City reportedly refused to release the prisoners until a judge threatened to fine it for every extra hour every prisoner would spend in prison. The victims of the arrests have filed lawsuits against the City of New York.

One of the most prominent personalities arrested was Eric Corley "Emmanuel Goldstein", an important advocate of public rights and independent media, and editor of 2600: The Hacker Quarterly. The complete report of 2600 is available at www.2600.com...

Several cases have since gone to court, and it has come out that the charges of resisting arrest in those cases were completely fabricated. Video evidence was shown of defendants complying peaceably with police demands. Many of the cases have since been summarily dismissed. Some of them, as of 2011, however, remain open and are expected to proceed to trial.

The New York Times has reported on two occasions that the police videotaped and infiltrated protests, as well as acting as agents provocateurs during the protests.

In addition, the New York Times reported that prior to the protests, NYPD officers traveled as far away as Europe and spied on people there who planned to protest at the RNC.



posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 10:15 PM
link   
I wouldn't surprise me at all if this is the case. I have friends who live in Southern California and they've been noticing all this extra military presence as of late.



posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 10:21 PM
link   
reply to post by 1825114
 


The Wiki source makes my case for me, brilliantly!!

The "Pier 57" incident occurred in....>drum roll please



posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 10:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by 1825114
 


The Wiki source makes my case for me, brilliantly!!

The "Pier 57" incident occurred in....>drum roll please



posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 10:42 PM
link   
AtG, ProudBird, and everyone else here that goes onto threads constantly, all day, everyday simply to "debunk". Do not trust them.

These people are just like the Jews who insisted that the ghettos were not being emptied. There is no way that the people would let the Nazis do that, they said.

Either that or we know who are our resident monitors from the "government contractor".


This is in your face, blatant. Be prepared. As Anonymous (a likely undercover agency) says: You should've expected us.



posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 10:44 PM
link   
reply to post by 1825114
 


Yes, obviously:


Are you saying he misrepresented the dates?


In relation to "Pier 57", and the other report from (Austin, TX?) that referenced "Y2K"! That would be about 12 years ago......the "Pier 57" incident occurred in 2004.

But, let's see what's up at "Pier 57" as of 2009:

Hudson River Park: Pier 57 Development


On July 30, 2009, the Hudson River Park Trust’s Board of Directors conditionally designated Youngwoo & Associates, LLC as developer of the historic Pier 57. The YWA team was one of three to seek the right to redevelop the pier, following a request for proposals issued by HRPT in June of 2008.


As is usual with AJ, his "reports" are contrived, and absent of any sort of factual basis.

He is a fear-monger, and a showboater for ratings and advertising revenue, plain and simple......
edit on Fri 27 January 2012 by ProudBird because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 10:48 PM
link   
reply to post by ShockTruther
 


But there is so much fodder!!! The levels of gullibility are astonishing, lately:


AtG, ProudBird, and everyone else here that goes onto threads constantly, all day, everyday simply to "debunk".


If people would apply a bit of critical thinking before repeating obvious bunk, there'd be a whole lot less crap to de-bunk!


ATS site motto, remember? Ignorance abounds nowadays, especially on the 'Interwebs'....there are people out there, including Alex Jones, et al....and his ilk.....who delight in putting up the most ridiculous junk, and getting people to swallow it hook, line and sinker.
edit on Fri 27 January 2012 by ProudBird because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 10:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by 1825114
 


Sorry to spoil the "fun", but that's just AJ being his typical fear-mongering con-artist self.

Even while his ignorance shows clearly (about mid-way, the "story" about "Pier 57" has the tagline title "Marshall Plan...er, Law" captioned at the bottom. He and his staff look like uneducated buffoons.

He assembled a barrage of various local TV News clips, taken out of context, and concocts this fantasy claim, yet again.

Heck one of the clips even had the female reporter on location talking about the "Y2K" revelers!!! How hilarious!! A clip from 1999 being used to "scare" people.

Humorous, but pathetic at the same time.......because people buy into his hogwash.
edit on Fri 27 January 2012 by ProudBird because: (no reason given)



Anyone with any sense can see that he is citing previous examples that occurred in NYC, Seattle, and Austin. The incident in Austin happened New Years 99'. Thus the Y2K revelers. This was obvious, so stop your ignorant and misleading rant.



posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 10:48 PM
link   
well thanks for clearing up that you're just reaching for straws.

He shows recent historical examples to prove that such facilities exist, and even said they were in his films that came out in whatever year... He wasn't misrepresenting dates of anything.




top topics



 
33
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join