It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
How do you know? And how does voting fix anything? Newsflash. The government does not care about you.
So half-truths are still truth?
Are you sure?
You're presuming that voting is having a say and that not voting is having no say, and that the ones who don't vote are apathetic, which is bullsh1t. Look at what just happened with PIPA and SOPA. No voting from the public, yet, they clearly had a say and influenced the outcome. Voting is nothing more than an excuse for people to pretend that they have an influence and that they did everything that they could to change their country. It's a good reason for people to sit on their ass instead of trying something to actually change this broken and outdated system.
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by vasaga
How do you know? And how does voting fix anything? Newsflash. The government does not care about you.
How can it care for those whom are apathetic and have no say?
So deceptions are not lies then?
Originally posted by Gorman91
So half-truths are still truth?
If they are telling no lie, then yes.
If you say so.. I doubt it though, but whatever.
Originally posted by Gorman91
Are you sure?
quite.
You're presuming that voting is having a say and that not voting is having no say, and that the ones who don't vote are apathetic, which is bullsh1t. Look at what just happened with PIPA and SOPA. No voting from the public, yet, they clearly had a say and influenced the outcome. Voting is nothing more than an excuse for people to pretend that they have an influence and that they did everything that they could to change their country. It's a good reason for people to sit on their ass instead of trying something to actually change this broken and outdated system.
So deceptions are not lies then?
And yet I just gave you an example that just worked a few days/weeks ago...
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by vasaga
You're presuming that voting is having a say and that not voting is having no say, and that the ones who don't vote are apathetic, which is bullsh1t. Look at what just happened with PIPA and SOPA. No voting from the public, yet, they clearly had a say and influenced the outcome. Voting is nothing more than an excuse for people to pretend that they have an influence and that they did everything that they could to change their country. It's a good reason for people to sit on their ass instead of trying something to actually change this broken and outdated system.
This is incredibly naive thinking, if not outright ignorant.
Listen? When was the last time Obama listened to what the people want?
Originally posted by Gorman91
It was the elected officials whom listened. This is what a representative government is. You vote in people to listen to what you want.
Then why is voting for a president, the supposed highest position, justified to be done by the mob? And you do realize you are part of the mob too?
Originally posted by Gorman91
We do not allow the mob to vote on bills, because the mob is a bunch of idiots.
Both titles are mind games. What you have now is fascism + police state.
Originally posted by Gorman91
This is not a democracy. This is a republic.
So you are aware that the media is trying to sway opinion. Now, tell me. What stake do these news networks have in this, to go through the trouble of swaying opinion? Isn't their job just to report? And why is it always in favor of one or the other, and almost never outside it?
Originally posted by Gorman91
So deceptions are not lies then?
You are calling it deception. Perhaps it is, but for the most part it is simply spinning what is true in order to sway opinion.edit on 29-1-2012 by Gorman91 because: (no reason given)
And yet I just gave you an example that just worked a few days/weeks ago...
Listen? When was the last time Obama listened to what the people want?
Then why is voting for a president, the supposed highest position, justified to be done by the mob? And you do realize you are part of the mob too?
Both titles are mind games. What you have now is fascism + police state.
So you are aware that the media is trying to sway opinion. Now, tell me. What stake do these news networks have in this, to go through the trouble of swaying opinion? Isn't their job just to report? And why is it always in favor of one or the other, and almost never outside it?
Of course you didn't.. Whatever..
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by vasaga
And yet I just gave you an example that just worked a few days/weeks ago...
I did not see such an example.
Originally posted by Gorman91
Listen? When was the last time Obama listened to what the people want?
... Really?
No significant presence in Libya,
Despite repeated assurances from President Obama and military leaders that the U.S. would not send uniformed military personnel into Libya, four U.S. service members arrived on the ground in Tripoli over the weekend.
And yet he's sending troops to other countries...
Originally posted by Gorman91
ending the Iraq war, concluding the Afghanistan war,
Really?
Originally posted by Gorman91
focusing on the middle class,
Originally posted by Gorman91
cutting the military spending,
Is that something that the people asked, and why is it a good thing? And why is it so easy to find counter examples for most of your arguments?
Originally posted by Gorman91
reorganizing the military to be a lean fast killing machine (something that should have been done in the early 90s), an tons others.
So the retarded stupid mob still has a high influence.. How is that any different? By degrading the mob you just showed your logical inconsistencies and contradictions, but, whatever..
Originally posted by Gorman91
Then why is voting for a president, the supposed highest position, justified to be done by the mob? And you do realize you are part of the mob too?
It isn't done by the mob. It's done by the electorate college. However, this is highly influenced by the mob. And the reason for this is that the president is supposed to be a populist trending position.
And the point is..?
Originally posted by Gorman91
The US government has a conservative branch, a populist branch, and a local branch. The judiciary, the president, and the congress.
Wow... Just wow.. Governments are fundamentally evil. It relies on violence to get what it wants, and it will always put itself before the people. How people get the idea that the government is somehow benevolent is beyond me.
Originally posted by Gorman91
Both titles are mind games. What you have now is fascism + police state.
Between the year 1776 through the 1790s, the US was a police state, as well as during the reconstruction period after the civil war.
Being a police state, hell even being fascist, is not indication that you are evil.
All governments work badly. That's just how it is. The difference is in the degree.
Originally posted by Gorman91
Every government can work well, or work badly, to serve the people. It depends on the culture, and the issues at hand.
Yeah right.. How's that working out for ya?
Originally posted by Gorman91
One of the benefits of a republic is the fact that the government can quickly become fascist, police state, representative, free, closed, or whatever, depending on the conditions that are at hand.
Do you not know that all freedoms given to the people are not actually in the constitution, but rather, the amendments? Because the founding fathers simply wanted a flexible government. They had no idea if a time would come when those rights would need to be suspended, thus they did not place those rights in the actual government. We, the citizenry, are charged with the responsibility of ensuring those rights issued remain. That security is done via voting for the right people.
So you are aware that it is intended to cause division. Ever heard of divide and conquer?
Originally posted by Gorman91
So you are aware that the media is trying to sway opinion. Now, tell me. What stake do these news networks have in this, to go through the trouble of swaying opinion? Isn't their job just to report? And why is it always in favor of one or the other, and almost never outside it?
Conservationism mostly. Journalism has always been about constructing the social divide between the normal and the abnormal. Reporting is simply the way this construction is done.
Is that something that the people asked, and why is it a good thing? And why is it so easy to find counter examples for most of your arguments?
So the retarded stupid mob still has a high influence.. How is that any different? By degrading the mob you just showed your logical inconsistencies and contradictions, but, whatever..
And the point is..?
Wow... Just wow.. Governments are fundamentally evil. It relies on violence to get what it wants, and it will always put itself before the people. How people get the idea that the government is somehow benevolent is beyond me.
All governments work badly. That's just how it is. The difference is in the degree.
Yeah right.. How's that working out for ya?
So you are aware that it is intended to cause division. Ever heard of divide and conquer?
Originally posted by mnmcandiez
reply to post by Gorman91
I don't know about the Tea Party being non-establishment. As the main author the SOPA bill was a Tea-partier...
Originally posted by David9176
You need to lay off the Glen Beck stuff man.
Originally posted by FlyingSpaghettiMonster
The Tea Party is what I believe is referred to as 'astro-turf'. A fake 'grassroots' movement that covers up the usual wealthy, powerful conservative suspects.
Appeal to ridicule.
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by vasaga
Oh boy 4 soldiers. I bet they could take over all of Libya with that.
lol Newsmax? I get their newsteller, mostly for laughs. Their entire agenda is against Obama, and they've lied more then a few times.
That's basically saying that we slowed down the comet coming to destroy the earth, and that that's a good thing, instead of trying to divert it.
Originally posted by Gorman91
A cut is a cut. Just because its increasing slower doesn't mean it isn't a cut.
Job growth and the value of the dollar keeps decreasing, so the income isn't enough anyway.
Originally posted by Gorman91
As for the middle class, plenty of folks here have posted the data that shows job growth.
Another appeal to ridicule.
Originally posted by Gorman91
Is that something that the people asked, and why is it a good thing? And why is it so easy to find counter examples for most of your arguments?
I don't know dude. I haven't exactly seen anything substantial to your "counters". News max, fox, etc etc. News organizations that are a laughing stock.
It's good that you know that.
Originally posted by Gorman91
Why is a smaller leaner military better?
Because all of history says it is. the Romans made this an evident fact in many points in their time. Caesar on a few occasions managed to defeat large armies with fractions of the size for his own forces.
I'm subjective? Really? Tell me. Where is there an objective thing called a president and a government?
Originally posted by Gorman91
So the retarded stupid mob still has a high influence.. How is that any different? By degrading the mob you just showed your logical inconsistencies and contradictions, but, whatever..
You would say that because you are very subjective, not willing to think before you speak.
So you're admitting that voting is actually just to make yourself feel better because the mob lacks influence..?
Originally posted by Gorman91
The electorate college means local communities decide, not the mob.
The government is always working for short term. Otherwise they would've abolished the Fed a long time ago.
Originally posted by Gorman91
The fewer people in a decision factor, the higher intelligence is present. If the mob in totality voted, they'd always go for short term gain and populism, and we'd probably be a dictatorship by now. The electorate college ensures a certain level of individual intelligence.
I know exactly how government works. It's an opinion with a gun. Nothing more, nothing less.
Originally posted by Gorman91
And the point is..?
If you have to ask that, you don't understand how government works.
If it's not good, why support it? You have to believe it's good to support it.
Originally posted by Gorman91
Wow... Just wow.. Governments are fundamentally evil. It relies on violence to get what it wants, and it will always put itself before the people. How people get the idea that the government is somehow benevolent is beyond me.
When did I say government was good?
Because it's fundamentally based on violence.
Originally posted by Gorman91
And why are you saying all governments are evil?
No, that's for logic to decide. You can't tell your children it's bad to use violence to get what you want and then say that it's good if the government does it. That's creating an exception to the rule.
Originally posted by Gorman91
All governments are corrupt to some degree. Good? Evil? That's for history to decide.
Oh so we can forget the slaughtering of millions of people because it changed the country into a super power? So, you're saying power is the main goal of governments? What about the people? Weren't governments made to serve the people instead of the other way around? Which is it currently?
Originally posted by Gorman91
All governments work badly. That's just how it is. The difference is in the degree.
All governments are corrupt to a degree. Some governments work brilliantly. If you look at Hitler's Germany, it was one of the best governments every created. It turned a 3rd world country into a 1st world super power in 10 years. but they also slaughtered millions of innocent people. This government was evil but efficient and worked good.
Really? There is more progress by division than by collaboration?
Originally posted by Gorman91
So you are aware that it is intended to cause division. Ever heard of divide and conquer?
Without division, there is no progress.
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse.....Not to mention that under a liberal democrat as president, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission was set up to regulate Wall Street, and what exactly has it done?... ...
Really? There is more progress by division than by collaboration?