It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by vasaga
Ok. Show me the correct data then? Until you can, this stands as Bush being better than Obama, whether you like it or not.
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by vasaga
HA! This graph willingly takes out Bush's first two years, and Obama's third and forth year.
You cannot compare unless you get ALL the data. You know, when Obama's policies first started going into effect, and when Bush's first two years of economic inheritance had him down too?
pff. Don't try to trick someone with statistics. It only works on people without keen eyes.edit on 28-1-2012 by Gorman91 because: (no reason given)edit on 28-1-2012 by Gorman91 because: (no reason given)
Oh rly? I gave data, all you gave is petty insults, basic logical fallacy called ad-hominem. Not to mention you're begging the question, trying to prove that the data is false by assuming it in the first place. You either prove the graphs are false, or they remain valid. If you can't prove they are false, your view is void. It's that simple.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by vasaga
Ok. Show me the correct data then? Until you can, this stands as Bush being better than Obama, whether you like it or not.
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by vasaga
HA! This graph willingly takes out Bush's first two years, and Obama's third and forth year.
You cannot compare unless you get ALL the data. You know, when Obama's policies first started going into effect, and when Bush's first two years of economic inheritance had him down too?
pff. Don't try to trick someone with statistics. It only works on people without keen eyes.edit on 28-1-2012 by Gorman91 because: (no reason given)edit on 28-1-2012 by Gorman91 because: (no reason given)
What your doing is dishonest and goes against the nature of this website. Why are you here? This is a website that is trying to push truth past the crap we get on braindead sources...and you come showing a tailored and disingenuous graph that paints a picture still demoing reality, but at a far less impact.
So, answer..honestly...why are you here? Are you a paid spokesmen of the gop or something? Why would your lying arse come here intentionally spreading disinformation..and being haughty even when called out on it?
heh..show me the correct data, until then the false graph stands. No..reality doesn't work that way.
Except I have evidence, you don't. There is no lack of evidence. Only lack of evidence that suits your biased presumptions.
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by vasaga
Lack of evidence is not evidence for.
Right.. Nothing will ever be enough, unless it fits what you already believe right?
Originally posted by Gorman91
Also still nothing from 2011 and 2012. "Jan 2011" is not enough.
Care to show some data to back that up? Or a news article? Something?
Originally posted by Gorman91
Things got better in 2011. A lot better. And they keep getting better even now.
I already provided data. It's your job to PROVE it wrong, not simply dismiss it because it doesn't fit your presupposed delusions.
Originally posted by Gorman91
You challenged, therefore you find the data. Toodles!
Originally posted by vasaga
I gave data, all you gave is petty insults, basic logical fallacy called ad-hominem. Not to mention you're begging the question, trying to prove that the data is false by assuming it in the first place.
Except I have evidence, you don't. There is no lack of evidence. Only lack of evidence that suits your biased presumptions.
Right.. Nothing will ever be enough, unless it fits what you already believe right?
Care to show some data to back that up? Or a news article? Something?
How did that work out with Bush? And what about the secret signing of NDAA?
Originally posted by David9176
reply to post by mastahunta
most presidents get their major policies done in their second term....which is why it's important for him to get back in there.
Originally posted by alienreality
reply to post by David9176
If you have had such an incredible leftward shift, then you must be really proud of Obama's latest and finest accomplishment the NDAA or as the bush family would lovingly say: Obama's "Nazis Der America Act"
Let me know how that works out for you in the future, or are you magically immune to what he does because you are now supporting him?
Originally posted by David9176
Haven't posted in awhile...so hello everyone and hope everything is going well for you all.
Fourth: The middle class is in the middle of a collapse...wealth disparity has exploded. I look at our prior history, the middle class was the strongest when tax rates were the highest for the most wealthy. The last 30 years we have completely gone in the opposite direction....now most families...both parents have to work....affecting the time we can spend with our children. It has to change....we cannot blame everything on the education system....much of the problem can be cast on both parents having to work (because wages have not kept up with inflation). But to the point, Obama wants to head in the direction of raising taxes on the highest earners...and i support it.
Ok, so let me get this right? Your own eyes are telling you that the middle class is in a collapse, Democratic, nor Republican parties have done absolutely nothing to help the average citizens of the United States and you are going to go along with Obama again
Seriously
Nothing further to say, I now know why america is in the predicament that it is in. citizens expect absolutely nothing from their government, when the government taxes it's sheeple to death
Originally posted by vasaga
How did that work out with Bush? And what about the secret signing of NDAA?
Originally posted by David9176
reply to post by mastahunta
most presidents get their major policies done in their second term....which is why it's important for him to get back in there.