Chuck Norris May support Newt Gingrich But his beard supports Ron Paul, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 30-1-2012 @ 02:13 AM by NowIsThe
A vote for Gingrich or Santorum is a wasted vote! Here's why....

The MSM is using Internet polls for the sheep...just like the man behind the curtain in the wizard of oz! No matter what the media wants you to believe, it’s already a two-man race. Of the 2286 total Republican delegates, 1144 are needed to win the nomination. In five states: Virginia, Missouri, Ohio, Tennessee and Illinois - Gingrich and Santorum are not even on the ballot. That’s 564 delegates that they cannot get. After South Carolina, only 59 delegates have been allocated to the four candidates. Mitt Romney has 39 of those. This means Santorum or Gingrich has to pick up 1144 delegates from the remaining 1683.

Dr. Paul is on the ballot in every state so let’s say that Dr. Paul only picks up 20% of the total number of delegates – I happen to believe he will do much better – but let’s pick 20%. That’s 457 delegates for Dr. Paul. Add that to the 564 that Newt and Santorum won’t have a shot at and now there are 1021 delegates that Santorum and Gingrich have no chance of getting. Subtract that 1021 from the total 2286 and you’re left with 1265 delegates. That means that Gingrich and Santorum, one or the other, must pick up over 90% of the available delegates to get the nomination. So, essentially, we’re down to Dr. Paul and Romney.

A vote for Gingrich and Santorum is a wasted vote! A vote for Ron Paul is not a wasted vote and may well mean that the next President of the United States will be a man that, for the last 30 years, has never broken a promise, compromised his principles or waffled his position on an issue. A man that still believes that the Constitution of the United States is THE law of the land and that the protection of our individual liberties is the primary reason for the Federal Government. Dr. Paul does not need to win FL. He only needs to win the caucus states, which overwhelmingly support him.

As much as the media would like us to believe, this race is not over.

RON PAUL 2012!



reply posted on 1-2-2012 @ 10:48 AM by badgerman24
reply to post by NowIsThe



That was very informitive (if thats how it is spelt)

Thank you for putting that on the thead i think it goes well with the article.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Vale Don Ritchie: the angel of the gap
  Posted 15 days ago with 18 member flags
Obama: \'Sometimes I Forget\' Magnitude of the Recession
  Posted 19 days ago with 16 member flags
One of these politicians is not like the others
  Posted 5 days ago with 16 member flags
5 Big Accomplishments of President Obama
  Posted 8 days ago with 9 member flags
Obama Campaign Uses Mother’s Day to Raise Cash
  Posted 16 days ago with 7 member flags
Meet The Women Of The Ron Paul Revolution
  Posted 17 days ago with 6 member flags
Newsweek: Obama \'First Gay President\'
  Posted 17 days ago with 6 member flags
Funny letter from Ronald Reagan to seventh-grader resurfaces
  Posted 11 days ago with 6 member flags