It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Afterthought
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
Bad assertions? Isn't that what you and proudbird use?
Look, they spray today. Go ahead and google search herbicide spray along the American/Mexican border. The government did not learn from the Vietnam War what spraying herbicides does and they are still using it today.
Granted, you probably won't find an article past 2009, but I can assure you that they're spraying to kill the plants that conceal border jumpers instead of manning the border properly.
Also, brush up on your knowledge about nanotechnology and cross reference it with what I've already provided.
Once you digest all of that, come back and tell me that you don't believe the government would spray anything on you, your spouse, your mother/father, sister/brother, your children, and, especially, your grandchildren.
Originally posted by roguetechie
reply to post by Uncinus
yes but molten steel was in fact seen pouring from the building .... so where did the molten metal come from?
NIST concluded that the source of the molten material was aluminum alloys from the aircraft, since these are known to melt between 475 degrees Celsius and 640 degrees Celsius (depending on the particular alloy), well below the expected temperatures (about 1,000 degrees Celsius) in the vicinity of the fires. Aluminum is not expected to ignite at normal fire temperatures and there is no visual indication that the material flowing from the tower was burning.
Pure liquid aluminum would be expected to appear silvery. However, the molten metal was very likely mixed with large amounts of hot, partially burned, solid organic materials (e.g., furniture, carpets, partitions and computers) which can display an orange glow, much like logs burning in a fireplace. The apparent color also would have been affected by slag formation on the surface."
I agree this is Tesla brought to fruition.
Originally posted by Uncinus
reply to post by DrunkNinja
Formus are not for posters to post material, then for everyone to agree with everything.
I was responding to the statement:
So, stop telling people.....WEATHER MODIFICATION...does not exist.
I was pointing out it was incorrect, and this usage was a straw man argument.
I don't think that just because the same incorrect statement keep coming up, we should simply let them slide the next time around.
This thread is about the myth and hoax of so-called "chemtrails".
Originally posted by ShockTruther
On a side note, I would like to reiterate what a previous poster noted.
ProudBird, AtG, and several others appear to have no other purpose in life except to attempt to debunk threads here. They never seem to admit the slightest possibility that any subject they comment on is even remotely believeable. They demand that they are the absolute truth on the matter and that everyone else is ignorant or uneducated. They demand proof of a conspiracy theory. (By definition most of these things can only be speculated on and not proven - any intelligent person should realize this, right?)
Very curious use of ALOT of time on their part, if you ask me.
I think I'll check out the posting history and make new thread with average posts per day, time of day, days per week, etc. I think it will be very enlightening. Time to fire up Excel and make some graphs baby!
Originally posted by panicman66
Chemtrails – The List of Patents For Stratosperic Arial Spraying Programs! United States Patent and Trademark Office
1338343 – April 27, 1920 – Process And Apparatus For The Production of Intense Artificial Clouds, Fogs, or Mists
1619183 – March 1, 1927 – Process of Producing Smoke Clouds From Moving Aircraft
1631753 – June 7, 1927 – Electric Heater – Referenced in 3990987
1665267 – April 10, 1928 – Process of Producing Artificial Fogs
1892132 – December 27, 1932 – Atomizing Attachment For Airplane Engine Exhausts
1928963 – October 3, 1933 – Electrical System And Method
Originally posted by nuttin4U
In any case, the spreading, persistent contrails have been observed for a very long time before "chemtrails" came on the scene.
That is just LAUGHABLE. That's what the chemtrail debunkers keep saying...with their crystal clear photos...edited in photoshop; to make it look like "a very long time".
These days, PROOF can be EASILY MADE. There is no black and white, it's all grey! It's kinda like a debate, where both parties are screaming at each other: "Is too! Is not!" "I got proof!"; "And i got proof!" People have lost their 'animal instincts'...and TV has played a HUGE part of that. We rely too much, on what "other people" say, instead of listening to our own INSTINCTS.
Let's ask the "experts"? hahahahah Pah-lease.....WE'RE ALL AMATEURS! Some people, just THINK their experts! E=MC2 WHO CARES! hahahahahah Can you build a fire, without matches or a lighter?
Originally posted by Uncinus
reply to post by luxordelphi
That's all very interesting, but what has the ionosphere (250,000 feet to 3,000,000 feet) to do with "chemtrails" (30,000 feet)?
edit on 27-1-2012 by Uncinus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by PhageThe atmosphere "supports" electromagnetic waves just fine without any help from "chemtrails". What do you think light is? What do you think radio is?
Funny article though. "GWEN pulse radars". GWEN is not (was not) a radar system, pulse or otherwise. A fine bit of nonsense from good old Dutchsinse. Still at it.
edit on 1/27/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)