Thank you for this!

S and F

Hey SoulVisions, I was wondering if you would comment on the oblique scattering angles in the dynamical converter? Specifically on Matrix's claim that the angles are such that the water that isn't trapped in the wheel exerts much less force on the 'box' than the trapped water does. I see Matrix's design working just fine if the non-trapped water was scattered directly into the external environment but that requires a rather large 'fuel' mass and I think people would notice ufo's shooting water out in all directions but forward... You seem like the guy to ask since you seem to understand centrifugal force and, say, the effects created by the distant stars.

On an unrelated note, it's always made angry to hear people say that a mass in the very center of a hollow spherical mass experiences no force. The center mass experiences force in every direction, they're just in equilibrium at the center. On top of that, a mass in the center of such a hollow sphere would demonstrate more resistance to acceleration than a ball that was truly isolated from all forces, no? In other words, a ball which is attached to 6 springs (+/- x, y, z) demonstrates more resistance to acceleration than a ball attached to no springs.

Now if only I could shift all of my mass to one side of my body without moving my body...

as in it means nothing when trying to learn about the matrix, ufo's is like a side topic, not needed, what is more productive is to learn about the matrix not side topics, anyway, that was what that was about.

I have to bump this again. The OP sure took a long vacation. I was hoping to read some more of his B.S.

Originally posted by cd5love96
I have to bump this again. The OP sure took a long vacation. I was hoping to read some more of his B.S.

Some of his other threads are actually pretty good.

Not sure if he will be back on ats or not though.

To anyone thinking that "The Matrix Traveler" is going to be back, you can stop waiting now. He has leave ATS after a few years of active posting, he is now posting some other website not as public as this one (you need an invitation in order to access most of the info there). So you can keep bumping this thread all you want, he is not coming back here.

That's a shame. The Pegasus forum may be more inclined to hear his ideas however, as they(his ideas) aren't specifically technology based as they were focused around a belief system that began with the concept that the crosshatch pattern you see when you close your eys on a bright day are actually part of "the matrix."

I just came back to these forums today. I would have loved to discuss hover technology more in depth. It just seemed like so much went over people heads at times. I'm not one to step on anyone's shoes or make false claims, which is why I tried to explain certain mechanics as simply as I could, but it didn't seem to matter. It's made more difficult when you're bound not to explain certain things in too much detail either. Still, since no one's like to believe or try any thing I might say on here it does give a little leeway.

Besides, it's a really difficult topic to explain without just outright showing someone else in person how these things work. Super conductive materials, gaussing hulls, electromagnetic fielding and radiation, compound engines, safeties, sooo many systems that it just goes on and on...

It's fine. Anyway, no one needs to take my word on these things (it IS a conspiracy forum after all), so pretty much I'm just left to say "yeah, it's out there." Later this year I'll piece together a small functional device for everyone to ponder over if budget allows. Maybe just something plate sized. I'll place it on a scale and show it's weight, maybe twirl a hula-hoop around it, show it's movement in "plus sign" shaped movement that UFOs are so popular for, place some more weights on it and kick it around the garage or something. People will say it's cgi or something anyways, I bet. Or at least years from now just smack their own foreheads and exclaim how obvious the basic concepts were to them all along.

All the very best to you, everyone.

Oh, one last thing here while it's on my mind, to clarify.
Why don't we see "UFOs" being used today?

I'll just tell you, now.

Earlier in the thread I mentioned briefly about economic reasons why this flight tech isn't used these days. As I stated just prior to this comment also, they just aren't really practical. While providing lift, they still require piloting.The system doesn't work well in a vacuum (space). They need immense power to run. They still need the ability to travel at incredible speeds through wind buffeting. Last but not least, the number one reason why they aren't used is because of their signature. These things are putting out so much around them that they show up on radars like bright stars, and if you put a porcelain "stealth" coating on these things, they stop working altogether...

Other than that, put them into service, and then crash just one of these flying "free target practice" craft, suddenly the next country has the tech as well. Fighter jets and Mach speed scram jets are better by far for military reasons. It's all about speed. Ability to move in quickly and then back out again either as a surprise attack, or just quicker retaliation. Only thing they're good for (as far as I'm concerned), is for shock/fear factor, and perhaps as smaller drones to interfere with enemy jets or communications (emf/emp). Maneuverable, yes, but what good does this do anyone when we have world-ranged ICBMs?

For now, they're best left just in storage and online conspiracy site stories.
Until we have an attack on domestic soil, no one's going to see them.
Not what you wanted to hear, I know, but that's the truth of it.
That in itself is a long shot as well. The above factors remain the same.