It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I vividly remember going to church with him in Bournemouth. He was a devout Roman Catholic and it was soon after the Church had changed the liturgy from Latin to English. My grandfather obviously didn't agree with this and made all the responses very loudly in Latin while the rest of the congregation answered in English. I found the whole experience quite excruciating, but my grandfather was oblivious. He simply had to do what he believed to be right.
Point being....If the Vatican itself doesn't call something improper, I'm missing where exactly anyone else has the basis to say so?
Originally posted by Misoir
reply to post by charles1952
Theoretically it is possible for a return to a more traditionalist path for the Holy Roman Catholic Church; one warmly welcomed. I see a gradual unease within the ranks of cardinals and archbishops. Once fanatical in their support for modernity I see such beliefs waning as time marches forward. Unlike some hard – liners I accept that every whisper of Satan does, necessarily, provide us with more wisdom. Meaning that, because of the time indulging in modernity the Church is slowly realizing what an enormous mistake this was.
I am not a perfect Roman Catholic, it would be a lie for me to lay claim to such a thing, but I try. That is all the more one can ask really of man in the age of modernity. However men of the cloth are supposed to be more morally sound than us; they are to be our leaders, to open our eyes and guide us toward the light. When their soul’s become corrupted, our souls follow. Because of this we have witnessed the departure into purgatory many good men and women who were led astray.
One can but pray that the slow progress being made by this Pope, allowing the return of Tridentine Mass, will continue in such a great progression as to restore all the critical aspects of Catholic theology. We must reject the ecumenism for Catholic exclusivism, religious liberty for pragmatic religious tolerance, collegiality for Papal supremacy, and of course return to the Tridentine Mass. All of Vatican II must be overturned, I would even argue anything reformed from Vatican I should also be overturned.
All talk of universal human rights, greatness of democracy, and equality of religions must be abandoned without reserve. It is the Kingdom of Heaven, not the Republic of Heaven. It is Christ the King, not Christ the President. I would conclude that anything less than the complete rejection of modernity would retain the Church and all of her followers, in the bondage of lies, deceit, and an afterlife in purgatory until the resurrection. There is no middle ground, no ‘realism’, only strict adherence to doctrine even if it means you lose 90% of your following.
Simon Tolkien, speaking of his grandfather J. R. R. Tolkien (author of Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit), noted this about an experience at Mass after Vatican II:
I vividly remember going to church with him in Bournemouth. He was a devout Roman Catholic and it was soon after the Church had changed the liturgy from Latin to English. My grandfather obviously didn't agree with this and made all the responses very loudly in Latin while the rest of the congregation answered in English. I found the whole experience quite excruciating, but my grandfather was oblivious. He simply had to do what he believed to be right.
web.archive.org...://www.simontolkien.com/jrrtolkien.htmledit on 1/27/2012 by Misoir because: (no reason given)
The Church crumbled at the feet of Modernity
Originally posted by newcovenant
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
Point being....If the Vatican itself doesn't call something improper, I'm missing where exactly anyone else has the basis to say so?
It is a little like the Army paying $100 bucks for each box of nails they buy from John Don't when they can get the same nails from Bob Do for $1 but John Don't is going to give the person in charge of assigning contracts a $20 kickback on each box purchased.
Improper? It is BRIBERY AND MISUSE OF FUNDS.
In the case of the Church it is the parishioners and the legitimate business people who are getting screwed in order to benefit operators charging double or more. To be blunt - the Church shouldn't be screwing anyone.
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by newcovenant
Dear newcovenant,
There are others on this thread more capable of answering you than I am, but because I spend my life in confusion, it's easy for me to ask questions.
In the first comment from the Vatican they're simply saying, yes, those letters are authentic but nobody's happy to see private correspondence leaked to the press. Why do you think that was disgusting and especially revolting? Governments everywhere get unhappy when there documents are leaked, Obama puts people in jail for it.
You say that the Vatican is engaged in corruption. Which of the examples given in the letters strike you as evidence of major Vatican corruption?
You don't think there are people with a hatred for the Church and would like to see it destroyed? There are many posters on ATS who would love to get rid of the Church.
Why do you think it was despicable for the Vatican to say it was taken out of context?
I told you I confuse easy. If you could explain yourself, I'd be grateful.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Anyway... point being.. Whether I like them personally or not, they sure seem to be everyone's punching bag lately on a wide variety of things.... It's getting a bit over the top.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
On the other hand and those inflated numbers.. I mentioned in another post that they also maintain the largest, most extensive and oldest collection of records and historical artifacts in the world and in history. They seem to indicate it's small and limited...but I'm not buying that for an instant. These are collections people have been building through time for the Church since it started. That takes money.....A LOT OF MONEY...
Originally posted by newcovenant
reply to post by mike dangerously
The Vatican issued a statement Thursday criticizing the "methods" used in the journalistic investigation. But it confirmed that the letters were authentic by expressing "sadness over the publication of reserved documents."
"Sadness?" This is disgusting and especially revolting when you consider this is coming from the Church which should be setting examples and not engaged in MORE corruption themselves. I can't believe someone has it out for the Church. The Church is just getting bold and sloppy.
"defend the honor of morally upright people?" They have to be kidding. That isn't even a good cover.
In its statement, the Vatican said the journalistic investigation had treated complicated subjects in a "partial and banal way" and could take steps to defend the "honor of morally upright people" who loyally serve the Church.
Why do I feel this sort of cronyism occurs in all forms of government and in particular the USA today?
I think these tactics were originally begun by the Church, and remain with us in a loosely veiled system of corruption in our present government today.
edit on 27-1-2012 by newcovenant because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Unvarnished
reply to post by mike dangerously
Vatican City is one of the richest cities/country in the world. The Pope himself has so much money he could feed an entire nation if he wanted too, but that is the way religion works, they tell you to do what is right, take your money, and in the end live a lavish life while everyone else is suffering.
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by Unvarnished
I'd like to come back to this thread, it sounds interesting. In the meantime, you may want to know that the budget for Vatican City is less than $400 Million a year.
New Vatican Bank scandal threatens to erupt
by John L Allen Jr on Sep. 21, 2010 •NCR Today
click to delete
This morning, Italian authorities announced that U.S. $30 million in funds belonging to the Vatican Bank have been seized, and the bank’s president and another senior official have been placed under investigation, following allegations of money-laundering. Specifically, prosecutors apparently believe that the Vatican Bank is being used by some Italian entities and VIPs to disguise financial fraud or tax evasion.
The formal name for the Vatican Bank is the “Institute for the Works of Religion,” or IOR, and its current president is the distinguished Italian economist and Catholic layman, Ettore Gotti Tedeschi.
The $30 million seized by civil authorities were in an IOR account at another Italian bank, called Credito Artigiano.
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by Unvarnished
I'd like to come back to this thread, it sounds interesting. In the meantime, you may want to know that the budget for Vatican City is less than $400 Million a year.
On 21 September 2010, Italian police declared that Gotti Tedeschi and another IOR manager were under investigation for money laundering charges. €23 million were seized as a precaution. Police began an investigation regarding Tedeschi around a week before the news was made public after a division of the Bank of Italy alerted police to two transactions involving the Vatican Bank that were deemed suspicious. The money seized was bound from an Italian bank, Credito Artigianato, to JP Morgan Chase and another Italian bank, Banca del Fucino. Both the origin and destination of the funds were accounts under the control of the Vatican Bank. The Vatican Bank had allegedly failed to disclose the origin of the money, a violation of Italian law.
In a statement regarding the investigation, the Vatican said that it was "...perplexed and astonished by the initiatives of the Rome prosecutors, considering the data necessary is already available at the Bank of Italy." According to the police, the presence of the investigation did not mean either of the officials involved had been charged with a crime, and a judicial ruling would be necessary to continue the investigation.[25]
On Thursday, December 30, 2010, the Catholic News Service homepage reported that Pope Benedict XVI had issued an Apostolic Letter that established the Financial Information Authority as an independent agency to oversee the monetary and commercial activities of all Vatican-related institutions, including the Vatican bank. It will monitor all Vatican financial operations and make sure they meet international norms against money-laundering and the financing of terrorism.
On May 31, 2011, Rome's attorney general released the 23 million Euros in assets which had been seized in September, apparently in acknowledgment of the steps taken in the following months to conform the Institute to international standards.