It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You showing me a bulltet hitting a solid Object (the WTC was a steel mesh) to undermine your point? Really??
So why didn't the second plane had this flash on impact??
NO one can be this obtuse in real life. Regardless of the design of the WTC outer walls, they were still a solid, and the impact and debris would behave similarly.
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by Hellas
You showing me a bulltet hitting a solid Object (the WTC was a steel mesh) to undermine your point? Really??
Are you deflecting the actual discussion intentionally?
The question posed was why did the material eject outwards, on impact, rather than be "pushed in". I showed ONE example of the dynamics of an impact. Then, this distraction to say that the bullet in the video hit a "solid Object", compared to the WTC "steel mesh"???
NO one can be this obtuse in real life. Regardless of the design of the WTC outer walls, they were still a solid, and the impact and debris would behave similarly.
So why didn't the second plane had this flash on impact??
It did.
Originally posted by NWOwned
Here is an ultra close-up of the first hit.
Again, two things to point out:
1. Stop this vid at 14 seconds and really really look at it full screen. Why? Because it shows a horizontal shadow across the building face. "Yeah, so what?" Well, the sun is upper left in the sky and should only cause right downward angle shadows like on other parts of the 'plane' and like on the buildings in the foreground. That's why.
2. Now stop it at 17 seconds. Why? Because as you will see when you do so the damage to the building in the supposed right wing tip location clearly happens before the wing section with the engine on it gets to the building.
Which, as I have already noted, is impossible.
Cheers
Originally posted by Gibonz
9/11 as a psy op has been very successful on the most part convincing people that planes hit the WTC. Hell, even some supposed 'conspiracy theorists' on this website have been fooled
Just ask yourself, why would they plant one of the 'hijackers' passport's on the streets of NYC, what are they trying to prove?
I gotta get me one of those indestructible passports BTW, wrecked too many in the washing machine over the years
Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by Gibonz
try playing the video genius - click on the picture
Originally posted by Levelsquare
reply to post by pshea38
9/11 was an inside job , or at the very least , we let it happen .
but anyone who thinks that missles or anything else but planes hit those buildings are fools. i saw the planes hit the towers with my own two eyes . live & in person , not on some grainy ass u-tube video.
I gotta get me one of those indestructible passports BTW, wrecked too many in the washing machine over the years
Originally posted by samkent
reply to post by Gibonz
I gotta get me one of those indestructible passports BTW, wrecked too many in the washing machine over the years
Personal effects from the Columbia disaster were found intact too. Was that another conspiracy???
Go and ask NASA why don't ya...
Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by Gibonz
Disgusting, in my opinion. Not surprising, but still.....disgusting......