The Military Is Replacing Humans with Giant Drone Surge, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times


reply posted on 27-1-2012 @ 02:37 PM by Bluesquid
reply to post by elbrujo



Many people think its impossible. How many times have you read, "They have technology thats 30 years ahead" or something of that nature?


reply posted on 28-1-2012 @ 12:52 PM by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
Originally posted by govspy911
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
Originally posted by govspy911
As a former member of the Armed Forces, I say bring on the drones. Our next enemy may be so advanced that our planes are going to need to pull some serious G's; so high in fact a human pilot would not have a chance in a fight. Drones can aslo be used in a Nuclear/Biological/Chemical environment where humans could not.


Yup, those tribal farmers might get ahold of some stingers... better throw all of your defense budget into producing ultra-advanced stealth drone bombers just to be safe


Tribal Farmers? Since when did they become our emenies? What I am referring to is a more technologically advanced enemy, and not necessarily from this planet. With armed drones capable of supersonic flight and no human occupant, their maneverability would be unsurpassed. They would be very handy in a conflict with Iran as well, so our bases would be better covered. Anybody who has ever been shot at would appreciate the drones, they are there to save American lives. I am an American and I have been shot at, but we didn't have drones. We had Apache Helicopters which are more capable than drones, but it puts another American life at risk.


Yeah, I'm sure imperialists would love using drones to fight their wars for them, while the enemy is forced to fight on their own feet in their own land.

Enemies "not necessarily from this planet"? Really credible statement there Maybe if the US really does end up taking over the whole world, they would have to make that excuse official in order to justify further weapons development.

Maybe you should worry less about risking your own soldiers in combat, and worry more about not starting wars where your soldiers and weapons are necessary, that usually end up killing hundreds of thousands of the "enemy" as we have seen over the past decade.
edit on 28-1-2012 by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 28-1-2012 @ 01:43 PM by milkyway12
reply to post by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi



Nothing will replace a human on the battlefield. In order for this to happen you will have to have AI technology that can operate within ROE rules and think on its own feet within ROE engagements. This technology would be VERY expensive.

Unless of course you just mean the airforce.

Having infantry drones is just to damn expensive. How about upgrading our personal armor instead. Our plates are a joke - armor is a joke. Hell they crack if you hit the ground to hard.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Iranian sailors chase off pirates attacking U.S. ship
  Posted 5 days ago with 95 member flags
BBC Caught In Syria Massacre Propaganda Hoax
  Posted 1 days ago with 74 member flags
Congressmen Seek To Lift Propaganda Ban
  Posted 9 days ago with 73 member flags
Man Loses $22,000 In New \'Policing For Profit\' Case
  Posted 7 days ago with 63 member flags
Bin Laden died of natural causes: Former CIA agent
  Posted 9 days ago with 58 member flags