reply to post by racasan
It has already been proven that coal and many other minerals that science once thought took a long time to form actually form in far less time than
thought. So because something looks like it should take a long time to form does not make it so. Remember when you are looking at it you looked at
it with the preconceived notion that it took a long time to form. If I looked at it I would be amazed that it was created in such a short period of
Whatever perspective you look at it is the perspective you will see it. Since science has been proven wrong many times about the time it takes for
things to form, it is easy for me to believe that it is wrong again.
I know that many read all the information on TOE and are convinced. But the truth is the assumption that a living organism becomes more complex
outside of its ability to adapt has not been proven and the DNA evidence suggests it is not possible. These are scientific facts.
I have done the research, and just because scientist claim a few plants appear to be too different from what they started out to be does not mean they
did more than adapt. We simply do not know enough about plants to even come to a conclusion about speciation of plants. Nor can we make the
assumption that what we see in plants is the same as what we have yet to see in animals.
Science simply has no explanation for why every species of spider forms a different web structure, kind of like God’s signature.
Nor can they explain the evolution of the male and female and sexual reproductions. Even trying to fathom the reason why an asexual organism would
become more complex, eventually splitting itself into separate sexes that need to mate to create another organism is simply against the whole theory
of evolution. There is no reproductive benefit.
To think about male and female some more. At some point the male and female had to form separate from each other, at the exact same moment they had
to be attracted to each other and mate in order to continue.
You can listen to TOE scientist explain with fancy sounding terms how all of this could of happened and believe them but it simply does not mean it
Is is possible that a car engine, which is less complex than a single cell, could under extreme circumstance put itself together? Assuming all the
parts were laying around next to each other, could this happen? Let’s just say for a minute that somehow they were shaken up and landed in the
perfect sequence what would cause it to start?
Take a 48 piece puzzle, which is also less complex than a single cell. Start shaking it around today until it forms the exact puzzle that it started
as. When that happens, have a conversation with it.
TOE is not logical. It is only an attempt to eliminate the creator. It is impossible to eliminate an intelligent builder. The universe is
mathematically perfect and way to complex to have formed by chance. The cell is so complex that it must have a builder. The truth of the creator is
There are many more examples where scientists try to explain away irreducibly complex things. One can talk oneself into believing anything. You can
imagine anything you want but your imagination is not reality. Just because a scientist in his desperate attempt to prove a flawed theory comes up
with an interesting guess on how something could have evolved does not make it so.
People are so willing to believe TOE on limited evidence and fine sounding, complex arguments that sound intelligent, even though they amount to
nothing more than my six year olds fantasy that one day she will flap her arms hard enough she could fly.
If I am to believe in evolution I must also believe that someday my daughter will indeed fly because anything that could happen must have happened.
Even if logic says otherwise.
edit on 30-1-2012 by sacgamer25 because: (no reason given)