It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by rebellender
reply to post by Bambobo
Do you mean like Sen. Rand Paul Rand Paul at the Airpot
Or a mothers 7yrs old daughter
or the little old lady next door
or for that matter the Governor Jesse Ventura and his junk toss
Do these examples fit the terrorist profile?
I don't really get your point with the senator. He set off a security scanner and refused to be frisked, which is hardly the same at all. That's about a guy who thought he was too high and mighty to be frisked, whilst the topic at hand is about agencies being able to spy on social networks...
Originally posted by Bambobo
Originally posted by rebellender
reply to post by Bambobo
Do you mean like Sen. Rand Paul Rand Paul at the Airpot
Or a mothers 7yrs old daughter
or the little old lady next door
or for that matter the Governor Jesse Ventura and his junk toss
Do these examples fit the terrorist profile?
I don't really get your point with the senator. He set off a security scanner and refused to be frisked, which is hardly the same at all. That's about a guy who thought he was too high and mighty to be frisked, whilst the topic at hand is about agencies being able to spy on social networks...
I'm not sure if those scenarios you set out are actual examples or fabricated to prove a point. If they're true, then did anything bad actually happen? No one ever decided that the little girl was an active threat to security or social wellbeing. She would've just been an unintended target of a screening programme, misleading intelligence or other reasons. Whatever the case, it was no doubt just disregarded as soon as it was discovered with absolutely no disruption to the little girl's life.