It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by r3axion
reply to post by caf1550
Officers are supposed to use only the force necessary to detain a suspect.
He was shot while he was on the ground like an additional 4 times.
This was an execution.
Originally posted by KaiserSoze
Escalation, de-escalation of force training dictates the K-9 should have been deployed before using deadly force. The dog handler choose to kill a person rather than risk his K-9.
Manslaughter.
That would clearly be a poor use of resources. Do you have any idea what those dogs are worth? They are expensive to begin with, add all of the training and they can be over $50,000. What do a few bullets and some extra paperwork cost? A public servant displaying sound economic judgement, in a life threatening situation none the less, impressive. Manslaughter? Lighten up a bit.
Originally posted by r3axion
reply to post by DelMar
Well it's your opinion and that's fine. I was just stating mine.
But there were definitely 10 shots.
the moment that cop saw him turn for him he could have simply fired a round into the air, then the suspect would have known they were serious.
Legs, shoulder, doesn't matter. He was like 3 feet away, give me a break.
10 times is not necessary yet they only use 9mm...One shot with a .45 would drop anyone,
Physiologically, a determined adversary can be stopped reliably and immediately only by a shot that disrupts the brain or upper spinal cord. Failing a hit to the central nervous system, massive bleeding from holes in the heart or major blood vessels of the torso causing circulatory collapse is the only other way to force incapacitation upon an adversary, and this takes time. For example, there is sufficient oxygen within the brain to support full, voluntary action for 10-15 seconds after the heart has been destroyed.28
In fact, physiological factors may actually play a relatively minor role in achieving rapid incapacitation. Barring central nervous system hits, there is no physiological reason for an individual to be incapacitated by even a fatal wound, until blood loss is sufficient to drop blood pressure and/or the brain is deprived of oxygen. The effects of pain, which could contribute greatly to incapacitation, are commonly delayed in the aftermath of serious injury such as a gunshot wound. The body engages survival patterns, the well known "fight or flight" syndrome. Pain is irrelevant to survival and is commonly suppressed until some time later. In order to be a factor, pain must first be perceived, and second must cause an emotional response. In many individuals, pain is ignored even when perceived, or the response is anger and increased resistance, not surrender.
The factors governing incapacitation of the human target are many, and variable. The actual destruction caused by any small arms projectile is too small in magnitude relative to the mass and complexity of the target. If a bullet destroys about 2 ounces of tissue in its passage through the body, that represents 0.07 of one percent of the mass of a 180 pound man. Unless the tissue destroyed is located within the critical areas of the central nervous system, it is physiologically insufficient to force incapacitation upon the unwilling target. It may certainly prove to be lethal, but a body count is no evidence of incapacitation.
Originally posted by r3axion
Seeing as I'm a Marine I'd say I'm pretty well acquainted with weapons and target ranges.
Originally posted by KonquestAbySS
One shot with a .45 would drop anyone, maybe they should start upgrading their weaponry....Those 10 shots could of hit any bystander...
Originally posted by Sek82
reply to post by MCJustJ
What if that cop who was about to get hit was your brother, or father?
The point I don't think is sinking in for some is that the crazy-crowbar-man had chosen to commit an act of deadly force first. The officers tried to use less than lethal force, but as soon as that weapon began to swing, the officers were acting well within their rights to respond in kind.
How many shots fired is irrelevant and here's why, unlike the military, police officers do not fire warning shots nor do they shoot to wound or incapacitate. They are trained to aim center mass and neutralize the threat... That is standard operating procedure.