Just because he was once a general does not mean he is not a fantasist. I find it hard to believe that any craft capable of traversing the universe would have any problems wiping out our primative aircraft, ket alone there being a battle. A battle suggests that both sides were evenly matched. I don't even need to watch the video to know this is BS.

Spewing disinfo/distractions IMO

Amazing. No matter how reliable the evidence, the skeptoids and deniers always have an excuse for the denial.

If the picture is clear, it is too clear and probably a hoax.
If the picture is fuzzy, then it is of no use.
If a civilian reports a UFO, they are not trained as an observer.
If a cop reports a UFO, they are not trained to identify aircraft.
If a pilot sees a UFO, they don't say anything because they want to keep their jobs.
If a former general reports a UFO, then we toss all of that out and say there is no reason why generals are any different from anyone else.

The system is geared to deny. Like 'Whack-a-Mole'... there is always someone waiting to knock down any report with whatever it takes... denial to character assassination; it's all in the ammo box.

Originally posted by michael1983l
Just because he was once a general does not mean he is not a fantasist. I find it hard to believe that any craft capable of traversing the universe would have any problems wiping out our primative aircraft, ket alone there being a battle. A battle suggests that both sides were evenly matched. I don't even need to watch the video to know this is BS.

You should leave the "ket" alone... Its narrowing your mind.