It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But the law cannot force insult to injury.
_javascript:quote()
So you're saying killing a perfectly fine, normal human being for attacking someone else is perfectly okay, but when it comes to a mass of cells living inside of a woman "Oh god, that's against morals, and I hate you for it! THAT'S WRONG!"
Is that what you're saying? You'd rather protect a glob of cells that won't be wanted, will most likely be thrown into a foster home or grow up in a horrible place than protect a living, breathing, human being whom attacked someone?
a perfectly fine, normal human being for attacking someone else
Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by Gorman91
But the law cannot force insult to injury.
Why not, if it means preventing innocent person from being killed? In such case, too bad, but there is no other way.
Nothing except imminent threat to life and health could justify killing another innocent person. Last time I checked, rape pregnancy is no more threatening for the mother than normal pregnancy.
Or will you finally admit that you consider a fetus to be of less value than born people? You cant have it both ways.
edit on 2/2/12 by Maslo because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MastaShake
Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by Gorman91
But the law cannot force insult to injury.
Why not, if it means preventing innocent person from being killed? In such case, too bad, but there is no other way.
Nothing except imminent threat to life and health could justify killing another innocent person. Last time I checked, rape pregnancy is no more threatening for the mother than normal pregnancy.
Or will you finally admit that you consider a fetus to be of less value than born people? You cant have it both ways.
edit on 2/2/12 by Maslo because: (no reason given)
a fetus does have less value then a person that has been born since a fetus cant contribute to society.
embryo =/= life
if sombody wants to abort a fetus then let them. the only thing i have a problem with is late term abortions since if your that far along you might as well give birth to it and put it in foster care.
And for you pro life people. If you were able to travel back in time would you abort baby hitler? would you trade the "life" of one for the lives of many?edit on 2-2-2012 by MastaShake because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Maslo
Why not, if it means preventing innocent person from being killed? In such case, too bad, but there is no other way.
Nothing except imminent threat to life and health could justify killing another innocent person. Last time I checked, rape pregnancy is no more threatening for the mother than normal pregnancy.
edit on 2/2/12 by Maslo because: (no reason given)
Daily Caller
Rubio: ‘America cannot truly fulfill its destiny unless it ends abortion
Originally posted by Pixiefyre
reply to post by paxnatus
But then as I described and clearly outlined in my post, you would rather force my living breathing daughter who has harmed no one, into such an untenable situation, on top of the damage already done to her, which her previously innocent, then abused mind almost couldn't take, and push her farther towards suicide in hopes that she just might survive it long enough to give birth to what was forced on her???
Then you do not support life. You only support unborn life, not the ones that are here already.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by Believer101
a perfectly fine, normal human being for attacking someone else
Your proof such a creature exists? I'm not aware of a "perfectly fine, normal" RAPIST !!!
BTW, I'd be curious to see how your opinion would differ if you were the "attack" (RAPE) victim.
edit on 2-2-2012 by DenyObfuscation because: clarity
Originally posted by paxnatus
reply to post by andersensrm
How ridiculous to equate a human life with a plant or animal. If you place the same value on a human life as a cock roach then I feel sorry for you, and do not believe you take the issue of abortion seriously.
Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by DenyObfuscation
It is not the only exception. Killing biologically still alive but braindead people (for example after a stroke) is also lawful (thats where organs for transplantation come from), even killing some not completely braindead but vegetative people was deemed lawful (Terry Schiavo).
Its obvious that the intent of the law is in fact the protection of the mind, which makes us persons, and not mindless humans, even if alive in the strict biological sense. Otherwise all braindead patients would have to be cared about until complete necrosis, and organ transplantations would be illegal.
Embryos are mindless humans too.
It is not the only exception.