It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Rick Santorum ' mic checked ' with fary dust ( video)

page: 1
1

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 25 2012 @ 09:31 AM
link   
Did a quick search did not find this posted, not sure if it goes in this section, but i thought i would post this video and see how members feel about it.

My opinion on i think they could have gone without throwing the gliter, but is that even illeagle?

Forgive any spelling errors, i am on my cell phone

www.youtube.com...
edit on 25-1-2012 by ShamilAbdullah because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 25 2012 @ 09:33 AM
link   
Link broken ?

Peace



posted on Jan, 25 2012 @ 09:46 AM
link   



posted on Jan, 25 2012 @ 09:51 AM
link   
Those people are losers beyond all belief, acting like children at the grocery when mommy wont buy them toys as they walk past the toy dept. Literally throwing crap and screaming......that's what I did as a child.



posted on Jan, 25 2012 @ 10:13 AM
link   
Well that is one way to get your point across I guess lol. Seems they should know in this day and age that when you throw an unidentified substance (however innocuous) at someone, the playground monitors give you detention.

Bad move fellas, you threw the baby out with the bathwater, or in this case the pixy dust.



posted on Jan, 25 2012 @ 10:27 AM
link   
L
L

so according to you all:

This Is Not an "Acceptable" form of protesting.


Focus on the critical sentence: "Yet, when a victim explodes or acts out in unacceptable ways, these same officials are shocked and indignant."

What exactly are these "unacceptable ways" of exploding or acting out? Who decided they were "unacceptable"? Why is it that "reluctant school officials" will not "take definitive action" against the bullies -- thus tacitly conceding that the bullying itself is not all that "unacceptable" -- while the same officials are "shocked and indignant" when the victim protests too strongly?

This pattern, and certain of its origins, will be found throughout history, in every culture around the world. The pattern is a simple and deadly one: the oppressor -- that is, those who are in the superior position, whether they are parents, school officials, or the government, or in a superior position merely by virtue of physical strength -- may inflict bodily harm and/or grievous, lifelong emotional and psychological injury, but the victim may only protest within the limits set by the oppressor himself. The oppressor will determine those forms of protest by the victim that are "acceptable."

You see this pattern with regard to many helpless, lonely children in addition to Billy Wolfe...
The oppressor may inflict unimaginable cruelties on innocent victims -- but the victims may only protest in ways which the oppressor deems "acceptable." The profound injustice is obvious, but not in itself remarkable or unexpected: this is how oppression operates. But ask yourself about the deeper reason for the prohibition. This is of the greatest importance: the victims may only protest within a constricted range of "permissible" behavior because, when they exceed the prescribed limits, they make the oppressors too uncomfortable. They force the oppressors to confront the nature of what they, the oppressors, have done in ways that the oppressors do not choose to face.

Take some time to appreciate the unfathomable cruelty of this pattern. You may be grievously harmed and even permanently damaged by the actions of those who hold unanswerable power -- but you may only speak about this evil and its effects within the very narrow limits set by those who would destroy you. If you are killed, the identical prohibitions apply to those who still manage to survive and who would protest the unforgivable crime committed against you. In this manner, the complacency and comfort of those who possess immense power and wealth are underwritten by the silence forced upon their victims. The victims may speak and even protest, but only within severely circumscribed limits, and only so long as their rulers are not made to feel too uncomfortable, or too guilty. Anything which approaches too close to the truth is strictly forbidden.

Memo to the Victims: You Yourselves Will Pay for the Crimes of the Ruling Class
powerofnarrative.blogspot.com...


what? are they supposed to mince around and wheedle:
"ooooh that's not nice, please stop" ?

but hey, keep idolizing and demanding respect for these psychopaths, and keep playing by their rules,and You Yourselves Will Pay for the Crimes of the Ruling Class, and will have no one else to blame



posted on Jan, 25 2012 @ 10:34 AM
link   
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
 


funny how everybody there was just fine with peoples rights being violated.

perhaps instead of sprinkles
some DMSO-4 mixed with '___' surreptitiously smeared on the mic would have been better

L
L now that would be a viral video



posted on Jan, 25 2012 @ 12:50 PM
link   
What a bunch of morons.

You can't throw anything at anyone.

Who knows what that "fairy dust" was...the police sure don't. The police took the appropriate action by dragging those fools out.



new topics

top topics



 
1

log in

join