When I think of the Australian of the Year I think of 2010 winner Psychiatrist and incredible idiot Patrick McGorry who wanted to initiate
pre-drugging of school children in his self acclaimed "Brave new world", how is that brave? it is cowardly and a fascist regime that would cause more
harm taring families apart that would rightfully appose having their children drugged for imaginary illnesses they haven't got 'yet' and probably
never would get just because they ticked the right box or have natural ups and downs that people learn to cope and evolve through.(worse is that it
would be assumed to be 'child abuse' for families to refuse to give toxic chemicals to kids because McGorry's tests say they need it for future
illness's they might get in the future, like it is for rightfully doubting vaccination effectiveness--- all being on-going NAZI agenda maybe
(still looking into the connection between pre-hitler eugenics and torture of 'sub-humans' by the psychiatrists that inspired Hitler. Psychiatrists
torturing and killing hundreds of thousands somehow managed to escape war-crime convictions to immigrate to mingle with like-minded American
psychiatrists. Also how the company that developed the Gas used to exterminate people in concentration camps and Psych wards prior 'I-Farben' split
after the war to form many Pharmaceutical companies in Germany and maybe the US, it probably goes deeper, Rockefeller etc... Thats why I loosely call
him a NAZI still yet to prove all Psychiatrists are ). .
[ I heard somewhere vaguely (don't take my word for it, maybe it is a bit out of context, not meaning it as evidence to the theory that McGorry is
actually supporting a Nazi agenda, more likely that he is not aware of what he's doing or has succumbed to the lure of financial incentives from drug
companies and cheap stereotypes of different groups of people ), that he intends to target Aboriginal communities, something with the supposed link
between Cannabis use and Psychosis, since apparently a good portion of them like to smoke Bongs any more then the average Australian I don't know (not
that their genetics would necessarily mean they are all at risk of allergic reactions like Caucasians are, maybe they can get away with it]
It would excuse the drug companies making more money from more unnecessary prescriptions of dangerous anti-psychotic and anti-depressants and
McGorry himself has financial conflict of interests receiving probably millions from drug companies for his "brave" work in promoting mental health,
his financial self interests and drug treatments and wants more from the Australian government and tax payers on top of this to initiate his plans,
(unfortunately if he's not successful someone else with financial interests in drugging as many adults and children as possible will do it, like what
I believe is happening in America so I hear)... ...
this link has nothing to do with pre-drugging happening in America, it is Citizens Commission for Human
Rights about Patrick McGorry...
Notice the typical fear tactics and strong notions western medicine use to get the dogma across to ill-inform/brainwash citizens and families who
have children that "desperately" need treatment, BS they haven't got any illness they're just kids growing up
mind you this is coming from a PsychiatristThe Age
"....had falsely claimed that 750,000 young Australians were ''locked out'' of care they ''desperately'' needed. ''He's taken the biggest
possible figure you can come up with for people who might have any level of distress or unhappiness, which of course needs to be taken seriously and
responded to, but he's assuming they all require...a mental health intervention"
(and probably a stigma and pushing drug requirement for the rest
of their lives, with drugs that are known to cause brain abnormalities and inhibiting or retarding spiritual development and self-esteem)
Apparently the method used has 90percent error meaning it would only get it right in 1 out of ten times that a child tested will go on in later life
to develop mental illness but there isn't any real evidence (more importantly there is no proof that there is any danger in having the natural course
taken in any mental illness to justify using drugs before any illness manifests ..That includes Schizophrenia-that is many myths they use to force
early and on-going treatment for the for the benefit of drug companies and rewarded psychiatrists - the drugsthemselves cause the brain abnormalities
that 'scientists'(who benefit financially from making these myths up) link to the so called illness
Abnormalities not evident in early Psychosis
[gone over my data allowance to be able to load at dial-up speed, so haven't seen this link yet,
but I guess it is decent]
9 out of ten kids would be put on drugs for no reason. Using drugs on developing brains hasn't even been properly studied, Drugs are known to cause
brain abnormalities (search for anti-psychotics brain shrinkage in Monkeys) and I believe is unethical to force it on developing brains.