It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obama To Give The State of The Union Address!

page: 12
12
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 24 2012 @ 10:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by RSF77

Originally posted by mastahunta
September 15th 2008

The DOW plummeted 600 points, by the first day of Obama's presidency the Dow had fallen
over 5,000 points.

Today the DOW is normalized, the housing market is moving, credit liquidity is increasing,
GDP has increased and employment is increasing. Last I checked, Obama ain't Jesus


Yep, but thanks to mass over regulation, those houses are even harder still to build and buy.

Along with a plethora of other fields pretty much encompassing the entire economy. For every inspector we hire 10 contractors lose their businesses. All this makes no difference to anyone other than someone who is already wealthy. Everything is gravitating towards Wal-Mart and Home Depot and making it completely impossible for small business to make any sort of profit, you'd be a fool not to see this.
edit on 24-1-2012 by RSF77 because: (no reason given)


Exactly, so how will America benefit by continuing to manufacture policies that only benefit the
already wealthy?

That has been the conservative approach SINCE REGAN, it doesn't work...

On the other hand

ow can ANYONE, conservative or otherwise be against giving a prospective
student the CHEAPEST student loan humanly possible?

Even Ron Paul would let the banks dictate the full terms of such lending which
would make education even harder to fund and MORE expensive. So in this specific
instance, how can you disapprove of such a policy?


edit on 24-1-2012 by mastahunta because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 24 2012 @ 10:38 PM
link   


just more lies, and lies


Yeah, right. Name one thing he said that wasn't true. Well, other than he will fix all the problems he mentioned, they are all factual though.



posted on Jan, 24 2012 @ 10:38 PM
link   
Yeah funny about Bush and Tarp.

Congressman wrote Tarp which had a Democratic majority which means they wrote TARP and Bush gets all the blame.



posted on Jan, 24 2012 @ 10:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by neo96
Yeah funny about Bush and Tarp.

Congressman wrote Tarp which had a Democratic majority which means they wrote TARP and Bush gets all the blame.


Bush gets the blame because he looked the other way for 8 years, Neo.

He looked the other way because he believes that the rich are the cream of humanity,
not much different than you as far as I can tell.

Bush made choices and his calculations were WAY off, non the less, he made choices and
followed conservative business related principles, look at the results...



posted on Jan, 24 2012 @ 10:43 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


He signed TARP in, he could have (and should have) vetoed it.



posted on Jan, 24 2012 @ 10:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by KonquestAbySS
 


Sounds like the tripe he's been spewing for the last 3 year promises promises delievering nothing.

Gotta be nice to be the incumbent and use the state of the union to campaign.




This has been going on since 2008!!!

Hold on Neo,hes speaking again..................................









Come on people................






posted on Jan, 24 2012 @ 10:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by neo96
Yeah funny about Bush and Tarp.

Congressman wrote Tarp which had a Democratic majority which means they wrote TARP and Bush gets all the blame.


Face it, Neo. You may be right about Obama, but you have to hold Bush to the same standards. They're both poor choices and both made bad decisions....



posted on Jan, 24 2012 @ 10:49 PM
link   
reply to post by sonnny1
 





posted on Jan, 24 2012 @ 10:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by v1rtu0s0
reply to post by sonnny1
 



I bet Neo got all week kneed peeping that...



posted on Jan, 24 2012 @ 10:52 PM
link   
reply to post by v1rtu0s0
 









Typical blame the right wingers for what they do meaning Bush.

The Democrats own the financial crisis.



posted on Jan, 24 2012 @ 10:52 PM
link   
reply to post by mastahunta
 


I think Neo should change his avatar to this, honestly.



posted on Jan, 24 2012 @ 10:53 PM
link   
reply to post by v1rtu0s0
 


Yes he can lose in 2012

Of course that is what you meant.



posted on Jan, 24 2012 @ 10:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by v1rtu0s0
 









Typical blame the right wingers for what they do meaning Bush.

The Democrats own the financial crisis.









right,


not the banks or anything





posted on Jan, 24 2012 @ 10:54 PM
link   
reply to post by v1rtu0s0
 







posted on Jan, 24 2012 @ 10:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by sarra1833
......OT for the Union Address, on topic to a past poster on here:

And come ON. Jobs overseas should be tax exempt?
How about us 79% of the population (or is that 99%?) who are unemployed and desperately seeking work talk to you? Tell you how much those overseas jobs are REALLY helping us out. I haven't seen a single POSITIVE thing hit this Country since jobs went overseas. Shame. You took from our plates to feed your minorities plates. (*minority being those in the United Rich Sector of America: aka Congress, Senate, HoR, etc). Sure the over seas jobs pay 30 cents a day and we.. I mean you get the profits when it's sold for 100 bucks. $99.70 made per item. Gee golly gawsh, pa, wish I could see a little of that. What good is overseas jobs doing for US, the people?

He actually talked about rewarding American manufacturers for keeping jobs home, and less tax breaks or even penalties for companies who outsource. Not a fan of Obama, I support Ron Paul, just saying.



posted on Jan, 24 2012 @ 10:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by v1rtu0s0
reply to post by mastahunta
 


I think Neo should change his avatar to this, honestly.


I will pay him!



posted on Jan, 24 2012 @ 10:54 PM
link   
reply to post by v1rtu0s0
 



So increasing the deficit by trillions, and starting new wars is climbing out of the pit?


Yes...you kind of have to spend money to help people out in a recession. Or maybe we should of just let all the unemployed starve in the streets. Then you would be complaining about Obama not helping them



And what new war?



posted on Jan, 24 2012 @ 10:56 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 



Neo, why do you always cover up for the Banks, dude?



posted on Jan, 24 2012 @ 10:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by v1rtu0s0
 



So increasing the deficit by trillions, and starting new wars is climbing out of the pit?


Yes...you kind of have to spend money to help people out in a recession. Or maybe we should of just let all the unemployed starve in the streets. Then you would be complaining about Obama not helping them



And what new war?



You have to spend money on what exactly to help them? It doesn't seem to make a difference, but the wealthy and corporations are raking in record profits..

Are you serious, what war?



posted on Jan, 24 2012 @ 10:57 PM
link   
reply to post by mastahunta
 


Here's a thought watch the videos and listen to their own words?

Fanny and Freddy guaranteed those mortgages Senators Frank and Dodd and The Democrats not anyone else.

Face it.



new topics

top topics



 
12
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join