I just need to point out something here about your whois query.
If you notice, all they changed is they took OVER the domain name and effectively did what is known as DNS poisoning.
They didnt actually take the site down or take it over, just its public DNS records, which is what humans use to browse to websites instead of IP
addresses. a DNS server is just a repository of what domain name resolves to where.this means that even if a site is only taken down through DNS
poisoning, if you know the IP Address of the website, you can still get to it.
For example,
www.abovetopsecret.com... resolves to
67.228.0.162...
copy and paste that into your browser instead, and you can see what im talking about.
People are talking about this whole thing like agents kicked down the door and stole the guy and his website away. what would have really happened is
he would have been served a letter stating what was about to happen regarding his domain, the breach and crime commited etc.then, the dns posioning
would have happened. its no different to a repo man putting locks on your wheels and towing your car away.
Ultimately, this whole situation smells. its like saying we should arrest the ceo of companies that make hard drives because they end up containing
child porn or illegal mp3 downloads.
The real reason there was a push to arrest this guy is because he was about to release a online goods store for musicians to be able to sell their
music ala itunes, called megabox. the difference is that instead of the labels getting 90% of the profits, that 90% would goto the artist. since there
was 40 million or so subscribers to megauploads, that would have been a huge customer base to start with. So, universal music and co pushed for the
arrest of this guy so the site couldnt launch, and they could continue making money from musicians...
edit on 26-1-2012 by faaip because: (no reason given)
edit on 26-1-2012 by faaip because: (no reason given)