It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by intelligenthoodlum33
Originally posted by Reheat
Originally posted by intelligenthoodlum33
9/11 Commissioners say "Official Story" a Lie
Hey Anok!
Great post and link. I noticed how the naysayers refused to even acknowledge your link to quotes from actual commission members.....Yet they say WE are in denial. I bet these same naysayers actually believe Iranians are sitting at their kitchen tables, hating our freedoom Opps! I meant freedomedit on 25-1-2012 by intelligenthoodlum33 because: nada
WRONG!
What you mean to say is that this stuff from a scam conspiracy site are "quote mines" and half truths perhaps caused by reading comprehension problem or even perhaps because of intention lies to misinterpret what was said.and why. How many commission member or staff on the commission are "truthers"? Name them by name and show the proof not some crap from "truther" sites...
Your pointless drivel aside. Did you actually go to the site? Did you click on the quotes provided (they are in red)? Of course you didn't, because if you had, you would be lead to the sources of each one of those quotes. Sources include CNN and Washington Post to name a couple.
I refuse to do any work for you and get in the way of your quest for ignorance...your doing too good of a job all by yourself.
Have a good one.
Originally posted by intelligenthoodlum33
reply to post by Reheat
Your getting desperate. Just give up and go along to get along, like you've been doing.
Originally posted by Alfie1
FDNY expected it to go and the media expected it because they spoke to the firefighters. Perhaps you had better specify who you mean by "they".
Originally posted by ICanThink
Originally posted by Alfie1
FDNY expected it to go and the media expected it because they spoke to the firefighters. Perhaps you had better specify who you mean by "they".
In this case "they" are FDNY. Basing on what data did they expect it? Please take note that at that time a steel building collapse due to some fire was highly unexpected. Fire happens all the time and it would be a huge problem if it may lead to a building collapse. So when they build building, they make sure it will not collapse due to fire, a steel one especially. So what was that exceptional data that made FDNY think that the building is going to collapse?
Originally posted by Alfie1
You don't need to be clairvoyant to consider that a building clobbered by a falling skyscraper, with uncontrolled fires and the sprinkler system out, which is bulging and leaning is likely to collapse. Would be pretty poor fire officers and a danger to their men if they couldn't make that sort of assessment.
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) had issued a report in May of 2002 – ‘World Trade Center Building Performance Study’ -- which noted that the diesel fuel storage containers in Building 7 might have been a source that could have fed fires in that building for quite a long time. However, the report also indicated that such a possibility had a very low order of probability and finally concluded that the reasons for the fall of Building 7 were something of an unsolved mystery.
According to Goodwin's website, the NESARA bill languished in Congress before finally being passed by a secret session in March 2000 and signed by President Bill Clinton. It is claimed that the new law was to be implemented at 10 am on September 11, 2001, but that the computers, and data (of the beneficiaries of the trillions of dollars of "Prosperity funds") were destroyed on the second floor of one of the World Trade Center towers in New York City during the terrorist attacks. Supposedly an earlier gag order issued by the Supreme Court had prohibited any official or private source from discussing it, under penalty of death.[3][4][5] Goodwin refers to "White Knights," most of them high-ranking military officials, who have since been struggling to have the law implemented despite opposition by President George W. Bush. Goodwin allegedly believes and purports that Bush orchestrated the September 11, 2001 attacks and the Iraq War as distractions from NESARA.[6][7] Goodwin's description of NESARA goes far beyond Barnard's proposal by cancelling all personal debts, abolishing the Internal Revenue Service, declaring world peace, and requiring new presidential and congressional elections. Goodwin often claims that Bush officials are attempting to hack into and bring down her web site to prevent her from publicizing the law
Manhattan Projectthe administration of community facilities was outsourced to Turner Construction Company through a subsidiary known as the Roane-Anderson
The Manhattan Project was a research and development program, led by the United States with participation from the United Kingdom and Canada, that produced the first atomic bomb during World War II. From 1942 to 1946, the project was under the direction of Major General Leslie Groves of the US Army Corps of Engineers. The Army component of the project was designated the Manhattan District; "Manhattan" gradually superseded the official codename, "Development of Substitute Materials", for the entire project. Along the way, the Manhattan Project absorbed its earlier British counterpart
So when they build building, they make sure it will not collapse due to fire, a steel one especially.
I still do not understand how one can come to a conclusion that a building is going to collapse just because of some fires. It was not like all the building was on fire, there were some local fires
Originally posted by intelligenthoodlum33
You believe the report from the same people who say it's bogus.
Originally posted by DrEugeneFixer
Originally posted by intelligenthoodlum33
You believe the report from the same people who say it's bogus.
But that's a lie which you have supported by quoting people out of context. When this is pointed out, you tried to change the subject.
If you have info that any of the 9/11 commission members believes any aspect of '9/11 truth'. Please go ahead and post it.
Originally posted by Starchild23
All you have is circumstantial evidence, LACK of evidence supporting their theory, and some crappy footage.
At the very best, you can prove that it didn't happen the way they say it did; but the more important part, what really DID happen...you can't prove. You can't prove any of your theories of exactly what happened.
Originally posted by Rafe_
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
At best, all this means is that I as well as the conspiracy people are both wrong in our positions. I can live with that.
Thank you for that.
This says so very very much about you.
Originally posted by Kester
(snip)
To sum it up, while many of us are attempting to understand the destructive process the government have not made that attempt. Simple asserting the destruction we saw was inevitable does not in any way explain how it could be inevitable.
Originally posted by Reheat
Originally posted by Kester
(snip)
To sum it up, while many of us are attempting to understand the destructive process the government have not made that attempt. Simple asserting the destruction we saw was inevitable does not in any way explain how it could be inevitable.
Most reasonably educated folks understand it already....
Originally posted by Kester
Originally posted by Reheat
Originally posted by Kester
(snip)
To sum it up, while many of us are attempting to understand the destructive process the government have not made that attempt. Simple asserting the destruction we saw was inevitable does not in any way explain how it could be inevitable.
Most reasonably educated folks understand it already....
And yet no model has ever behaved in a remotely similar manner.