It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
....beautiful boat moon tonight.
Originally posted by ProudBird
Seeing it from Southern California? I saw one about a month ago from here, too....something is up!!
Clouds obscure the view of other objects in the sky, though varying thicknesses of cloudcover have differing effects. A very thin cirrus cloud in front of the moon might produce a rainbow-colored ring around the moon.
Stars and planets are too small or dim to take on this effect, and are instead only dimmed (often to the point of invisibility).
Thicker cloudcover obscures celestial objects entirely, making the sky black or reflecting city lights back down. Clouds are often close enough to afford some depth perception, though they are hard to see without moonlight or light pollution.
In 2000, Allan Rahill, a meteorologist at the Canadian Meteorological Centre (CMC), created a forecast processing step that took data from CMC's Global Element Multi-scale (GEM) forecast model and created a new forecast of cloud cover. Rahill specially designed his cloud forecast to consider the formation of cirrus clouds. The cirrus cloud modeling distinguishes Rahill's model from other cloud forecast models, as sufficient cirrus clouds to make a night unusable for astronomers is still called "clear" by civil weather forecasts.
.....what, does all this mean? It means that cirrus aviaticus .....(snip)..... make it impossible to view the night sky...
How many stars and planets to astronomers wish to view at lunchtime? Since this thread is about clouds at lunch....it is usually presumed that "lunch" occurs around Noon local time, yes?
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by luxordelphi
So what is it you are hiding from the world about chemtrails that is important?
Why is it that chemtrail believers never actually show this proof that supposedly exists? Why are you hiding it?
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by mileslong54
Ah - the old "you can't prove it isn't true" argument from ignorance to try to shift the burden of proof.
also a classic believer tactic when faced with teh inadequacy of their evidence.
Sorry Miles - but the existence of contrails is long established - as is the existence of clouds.
If something looks like a contrail, is generated like a contrail and behaves like a contrail then it is reasonable to conclude that it is a contrail.
If you want to show that it is NOT a contrail then it is up to you to prove your case.
Method of modifying weather
United States Patent 6,315,213 / Cordani / November 13, 2001
164.195.100.11.../netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6315213.WKU.&OS=PN/6315213&RS=PN/6 315213
A method for artificially modifying the weather by seeding rain clouds of a storm with suitable cross-linked aqueous polymer. The polymer is dispersed into the cloud and the wind of the storm agitates the mixture causing the polymer to absorb the rain. This reaction forms a gelatinous substance which precipitate to the surface below. Thus, diminishing the clouds ability to rain.
Process for absorbing ultraviolet radiation using dispersed melanin
United States Patent / 5,286,979 / Berliner / February 15, 1994
164.195.100.11.../netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5286979.WKU.&OS=PN/5286979&RS=PN/5 286979
This invention is a process for absorbing ultraviolet radiation in the atmosphere by dispersing melanin, its analogs, or derivatives into the atmosphere. By appropriate choice of melanin composition, size of melanin dispersoids, and their concentration, the melanin will absorb some quantity of ultraviolet radiation and thereby lessen its overall effect on the critters who would normally absorb such radiation.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by luxordelphi
So what is it you are hiding from the world about chemtrails that is important?
Why is it that chemtrail believers never actually show this proof that supposedly exists? Why are you hiding it?
Originally posted by mileslong54
Yes I can play your game you are correct, it works both ways, as for the proof you lack sources that prove the chemical compound in the trail behind planes making it a contrail while demanding other have sources to prove that it's a chemtrail.
Originally posted by mileslong54
BTW - Is US PATENT inadequate evidence?
Originally posted by luxordelphi
What are the obvious effects of chemtrails? They obscure the sky. This is an effect that can't be disputed.
Originally posted by mileslong54
80 degrees in Southern California yesterday - see that little part about IF THE AIR IS COLD ENOUGH in the definition of contrail. 80 degree and contrails everywhere. HMMMMMMMMM.......
Originally posted by Uncinus
Originally posted by mileslong54
80 degrees in Southern California yesterday - see that little part about IF THE AIR IS COLD ENOUGH in the definition of contrail. 80 degree and contrails everywhere. HMMMMMMMMM.......
80 degrees on the ground.
-40 degrees at 35,000 feet. Where the contrails are.
www.usairnet.com...