It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
I see this thread as an intent to prove something.
I think we should all simply explain the science and suspend the name calling and pointed remarks...I respect anyone whom actually is wanting to give evidence.
The dude didn't know the science behind what he was doing, and so the suggestion of the glass (tube, etc) around was given. really nothing more needs to be said..and either he will accept it and move on, or redesign over and over until something interesting is produced..but lets not blast someone to kingdom come for their first (flawed) experiment.
Helpful suggestions works far better in bringing people into knowledge than ridicule..and we are after all here for knowledge verses just a fun exercise of flaming one another, no?
Originally posted by phantomjack
Originally posted by SaturnFX
I see this thread as an intent to prove something.
I think we should all simply explain the science and suspend the name calling and pointed remarks...I respect anyone whom actually is wanting to give evidence.
The dude didn't know the science behind what he was doing, and so the suggestion of the glass (tube, etc) around was given. really nothing more needs to be said..and either he will accept it and move on, or redesign over and over until something interesting is produced..but lets not blast someone to kingdom come for their first (flawed) experiment.
Helpful suggestions works far better in bringing people into knowledge than ridicule..and we are after all here for knowledge verses just a fun exercise of flaming one another, no?
While I would like to believe that the "dude" didn't understand the science, I just don't think that is an excuse of ignorance.
He deliberately posted this thread, knowing full well that he would be shot down and debunked.
While I agree that we should not be calling others names, I do however, feel that if he is smart enough to light a candle, then he is smart enough to know that his "Proof" proves nothing.
He is merely either seriously delusional, or, he is trolling for flags.
If he is making money "healing" people, and is using this as proof, then he is a criminal committing fraud by deception. I think that is pretty serious, and I don't think that ATS members should assist him in fraud.
Originally posted by WiindWalker
Your statement would be true if I actually wanted to give the time and energy to waste here on the boards just to lie to people. No thanks, not my style. I have 3 kids of my own and to be honest, I don't have the energy or time to sit there and "think" up crap to speal (sic) to you guys here.
Originally posted by schuyler
Originally posted by WiindWalker
Your statement would be true if I actually wanted to give the time and energy to waste here on the boards just to lie to people. No thanks, not my style. I have 3 kids of my own and to be honest, I don't have the energy or time to sit there and "think" up crap to speal (sic) to you guys here.
yet you've just spent a considerable amount of time and energy doing just that. I don;t know which is sadder, the fact that you actually believe you have proven something here or that you expect us to believe it.You have been amply outted here. Game over.
It's time for the hook.
Matthew 6:3 But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing,
Matthew 6:5 "And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by men. I tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full.
Matthew 6:16 "When you fast, do not look somber as the hypocrites do, for they disfigure their faces to show men they are fasting. I tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full.
Young's Literal Translation
whenever, therefore, thou mayest do kindness, thou mayest not sound a trumpet before thee as the hypocrites do, in the synagogues, and in the streets, that they may have glory from men; verily I say to you -- they have their reward!
Originally posted by dplum517
@ ballisticmouse ....... you sound like an atheistic pessimistic fool with no understanding of other cultures.
Originally posted by WiindWalker
EDIT**** Here is another video of my hand BEHIND the glass of the candle, impossible for turbulance.
edit on 24-1-2012 by WiindWalker because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Alyssa
I wanna see it with my eyes for once. This reality is boring.
Originally posted by MischeviousElf
The glorious power of an grain of sand dancing with the rest of the universe will surpasse all the CGI you could dream of even in your wildest imaginations.
On first viewing, Chang appears to be doing a few simple carnival tricks:
1. "Generating electricity" - this is normally done with the use of a small high-frequency, high-voltage, low-amperage device taped to the performer's body. James Randi mentions this device here, regarding others who have done this:
Randi wrote:This “chi” scam artist on YouTube is probably using the very same setup as the Malaysian crook did, a small battery-powered device worn on the body that develops very high voltage at very low amperage, that can be directed from the body of the performer to anything that’s at a lower potential than he is. It’s a form of Tesla coil, and it’s very effective. There’s also a rabbi in New York using this same gimmick to convince the faithful…
2. Catching a "rifle bullet" - what is shown is the firing of a very low-speed pellet that can pierce the wall of an empty soda can. Then, Chang puts his hand in front of the gun. He is in no danger, and there does not appear to be anything extraordinary about what he is doing.
3. Moving a knife - Chang carefully balances a knife on its sheath. It is shown moving slightly in one direction, twice. With such a precariously-balanced object, the slightest breeze will move it readily. All Chang has to do is wait a bit. In the first movement, he has his mouth close to the knife, "talking" to it. In the second, he has leaned back, so either he's caught a breeze, or he started the knife in a position that would naturally swing away, or else he's using his knee (either one would work, but it's hard to tell from that angle which, if either, is in position), to slightly lift the glass tabletop.
4. "Fooling the experts" - they have a CEO, a doctor, and a physicist. They really needed an electrical engineer. They try to use an ordinary volt meter. If he's using the high-frequency device, of course they will not get readings from this! Some experts they are! Maybe they actually do use the metal detector on his back and feet to check for the device, but this is not shown. Chang seems to be flexing his back to produce his electricity. I would check between his shoulder blades. I mean, they strip him almost naked, but they let him leave his shirt on?!? Oh, and the color-changing LEDs have different colors depending on the direction of the current, not the amount.
5. "Chopstick through the table" - has anything ever looked more like a set-up magic trick? First, he takes them to his local restaurant. Then he can't make the "chi" work on Formica, so he needs to use the bottom of the table. This trick requires nothing more than a cheap table with a seam in the wood.
As miracles go, I can't say I'm impressed.