Judge orders woman to give up password to hard drive, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 14 times


reply posted on 31-1-2012 @ 12:59 AM by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to
post by OccamsRazor04



Here is your problem, if someone gets a warrant, what are they looking for? Do they already have evidence? You can get a warrant for the key for the lock but not the combination.


You make a good point. Is the password a key, or a combination. It actually fits both descriptions I think, but is neither. I believe much like a persons private dwelling, the court has the right to compel, so long as evidence for the search is provided, a person to provide access.

They may not be entitled to the password (removing any testimonial information), but they are entitled to access (which is what the key provides). I do not have the right to deny access to my personal home to law enforcement officers in possession of the proper warrant, and I should not be able to deny them access to my computer, so long as they provide the proper warrant.


reply posted on 31-1-2012 @ 01:00 AM by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by noxvita83



That is not a court cost, that is the cost involved in aquiring evidence by law enforcement. This will be coming out of your taxes my friend.


reply posted on 31-1-2012 @ 01:02 AM by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by Reaper2137



The 5th precludes a judge from ordering a person to give up the combination to a safe. Just an FYI.



reply posted on 1-2-2012 @ 02:20 PM by spav5
reply to post by paraphi


I would feel exactly the same no matter what the crime ..you are presuming guilt of the accused I am defending the 5th amendment..why don't we make confession mandatory? That would speed things along and help the prosecution. Would save lots of money too

Peace


reply posted on 21-5-2012 @ 04:59 PM by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Update:

www.newtechobserver.com...

www.wired.com...



“They must have used or found successful one of the passwords the co-defendant provided them,” Fricosu’s attorney, Philip Dubois, said in a telephone interview Wednesday.


So her husband either ratted her out on possible passwords or the government stumbled onto a password that she used for other things (eg email)..

Note it was not cracked, she just did not use a good enough password.

Lesson: Do not share your passwords with anyone and make good passwords that you do not resuse.
edit on 043131p://5America/ChicagoMon, 21 May 2012 16:59:39 -0500 by THE_PROFESSIONAL because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 22-5-2012 @ 11:32 AM by Dragoon01
reply to post by Lazyninja



Apparently your Ninja skills need some brush up.
It is rather easy to encrypt a hard drive and require a password.

You cannot be compelled to provide evidence against yourself thats not obstruction of justice its a civil right.


reply posted on 23-5-2012 @ 01:14 AM by BMorris
I had a business grade Lenovo laptop once. The coolest feature about it was it had a secure hdd.

That is, the hdd was by default, encrypted by the hard drives own electronics. You had to input a hdd unlock password before the machine would even boot up. No password, the drive wouldn't even spin up. Wrong password, the data on it remained encrypted. The only way law enforcement could have gained access to it, was to seize the machine while it was powered on and operational.

Sad thing was, it got stolen by a local meth-head. We all know who stole it, just can't prove it.

As for steganography, police are well aware of it. In the UK, if they raid, you'd better supply 2 passwords. One for the outer volume, one for the hidden volume. In the UK, its an offence to fail to supply a valid password, punishable by 6 months in jail (which can be repeated until you finally give it up). Its also an offence to destroy the data. "Willful destruction of evidence".You;d have a hard time convincing a ccourt that it wasn't evidence, since you destroyed it.

Pretty much the only valid defence in the UK, is "I've forotten it, guv, sorry sir. I'd had a few to many bevvies that night".

Also, truecrypt had a flaw at one time, don't know if it still does. It cached the passwords in RAM, and they could be extracted by forensics from the RAM. RAM chips, if handled correctly, retain the last data written to them for up to 30 minutes of being powered down. They have to be kept cold (below -20C), very cold, but it gives them time to whip them out of your machine, and remount them in another machine where the passwords can be extracted.

This phenomenon has been known for years, but only really studied since 2002, its called "Data Remanence in RAM".



reply posted on 23-5-2012 @ 01:21 AM by BMorris
reply to post by ntech



A modern digital forensics lab would extract the data off that, before breakfast. Sorry. They would just unscrew the platters from the spindle, remount them in a special machine which can extract the data from any undamaged surfaces. True, they wouldn't get all the data, but they'd get a large amount of it.

Only secure way of physically destroying the data, is to grind the platters into dust.


reply posted on 23-5-2012 @ 12:00 PM by Xaphan
reply to post by BMorris


Or the easiest way: Just go 20 miles out into the woods and bury it a few feet deep. They would have no way of knowing where it was.
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Iranian sailors chase off pirates attacking U.S. ship
  Posted 5 days ago with 94 member flags
Congressmen Seek To Lift Propaganda Ban
  Posted 8 days ago with 73 member flags
Man Loses $22,000 In New \'Policing For Profit\' Case
  Posted 6 days ago with 63 member flags
Bin Laden died of natural causes: Former CIA agent
  Posted 9 days ago with 58 member flags
BBC Caught In Syria Massacre Propaganda Hoax
  Posted 1 days ago with 53 member flags