That entire fluoride thread was based on a misinterpreted study on fluoride uptake in pet/ft scan patients...injected into the blood stream.

A blind dyslexic would have known this if one took the time to actually read the article.

Way to deny ignorance!

Makes ATS look pretty stupid if you ask me, and to those that will say "it gets the message out", I have to ask how you are comfortable with telling a lie to spread "truth"

Nearly 200 flags clearly shows that the majority aren't interested in the truth.

Big fat fail ATS, thought we had standards and morals here...

I LOVE THESE VIDEOS!!!!

Hope to see one of my thread up there soon, keep up the good.

ALS

I wathed, and I'm still impressed. Good job Bryan!

(There are somethings that you just can't joke about here.....flouride and aliens.)

(u2u is working again, btw.)

If one studies the nutritional elements that help heart disease, one finds the fluoride effects at the center.

The PET issue just found that fluoine likes these plaque areas, which points to the fluorine pathway is there.

But the nutritional locus of information tells the fluoride plays a large role in the vein deposit issues via the boron associations.

This F-18 tracer study using PET systems shows the distribution of the fluorine tracer all over the body. They have enough to land in the calcium deposits of the veins to image those. They had tons more land in the bone mass that lit up like a christmas tree on the PET imaging, and it likely even caught the Pineal gland also.

For those watching the issues of fluoride, the fact that it did land on the spine which is tied to the issues of bone mass increases due to fluoride retained in that bone mass, then it is not leap of faith to suspect the same process of fluoride localization to the pineal glands calcium is an issue and the localization of fluoride to the arterial walls is in the same category.

This PET method just shows it happens. We also know from the studies on fluoridation and the Grand Rapids Michigan studies of fluoride retained in the aeorta walls that the amount is very large. This is covered in books by George Waldbott, a highly respected fluoride researcher.

There appears to be a lot of denials and attempts to focus the spot on the issue that the study only sought to show that fluoride does image these arterial calcium plaques, but the extended issues are obvious to anyone that has read the issues of fluoride build up in the body that contributes to the process of more calcium build up followed by more fluoride build up and the ugly problems of arterial narrowing and blockages.

That study shows with little doubt that fluoride becomes part of the process that follows along the same lines as fluoride used to build up bone mass in the spine that contributes to nerve pinch problems and pain from bone spurs of the spine.

Most intelligent and well read on this particular imaging data find it reaches well beyond just the ability to see the arterial calcium build up. imho

Here is the radio show that I uploaded from 2005 regarding GMO food and what it does to the human body.
glovurm.4shared.com