Continued from above....
Like his counterpart in the Senate, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-TX) has also introduced rouge sites legislation. Following spring hearings on the issue, after several months of delay, Chairman Smith introduced his bill in late October with a hearing following shortly after. Like PIPA, the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), is designed to shut down foreign websites committing copyright infringement by cutting off their funding and shrinking their U.S. audience. SOPA, however, has some key distinctions that have many parties, including prominent internet companies like Google, Amazon, and Facebook, extremely concerned. They include a definition of rogue sites that critics deem to be “dangerously” overbroad, (defining a rogue site as merely “facilitating” copyright infringement) as well as limited due process considerations in the private right of action copyright and trademark holders have when asking payment processors and advertising networks to cut off funding for an offending site. In contrast to the unanimous approval of PIPA in the Senate, after 14 hours of an often acrimonious markup held shortly before the Christmas recess, and despite pushing strongly for passage, Chairman Smith pulled the bill from Committee consideration, delaying further action on the bill until later this month.
Despite the setback in the House for supporters of the bill, shortly before the Senate adjourned, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) indicated he would challenge the hold Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) has on the bill, and make PIPA the first bill the Senate considers in 2012. With opinion on the bill at an all-time high, and advocates on both sides primed for the fight, the outcome is uncertain. If the bill wins passage, it could likely become the template the House follows; if the bill fails to gain enough votes to break the hold and advance, it may indicate that rouge sites legislation could have trouble advancing in 2012.
www.magazine.org... 012#3
Now on the same site.
What is MPA-PAC?
MPA-PAC is the Magazine Publishers of America Political Action Committee. Its purpose is to raise money from the MPA community and make contributions to political committees and federal candidates for elected office. MPA-PAC is part of MPA’s government affairs program, which includes its day-to-day lobbying on Capitol Hill by MPA professional staff.
Who is eligible to contribute to MPA-PAC?
Federal election laws prohibit candidates for federal office from receiving corporate campaign contributions. Therefore, PACs which contribute to candidates for federal office must not accept contributions from corporations. Contributions to MPA-PAC may only be solicited from the executives and administrative personnel (and their families) of MPA member companies (a term in federal election law known as the “restricted class”). The donations must be solicited only from this restricted class of individuals rather than the corporations.
www.magazine.org...
Now a little about "Restricted Class".
'RESTRICTED CLASS' COMMUNICATIONS
Perhaps the most important political tool available to corporations is the least understood and most underused. A corporation may use corporate treasury funds to communicate with its so-called restricted class of employees and shareholders "on any subject." The FEC's regulations explicitly allow communications expressly advocating the election or defeat of a clearly identified federal candidate. In other words, a corporation may:library.findlaw.com...
attempt to persuade members of its restricted class to vote for or contribute to particular candidates,
(subject to certain restrictions) invite preferred candidates to appear in person before its restricted class to receive the corporation's endorsement and to seek votes, volunteers, and contributions, and operate telephone banks for the purpose of urging members of the restricted class to register and get out to vote for (oragainst) particular candidates.
Continued below......


