Originally posted by gariac
reply to post by Imtor
There is recent thread on Schneider based on "testimony" from his widow. Lazar sadly makes more sense than Schneider, which speaks volumes.
Lazar knows some science. There are huge gaping holes in his explanation of how the "sport model" works. Clearly it is meant for the general public, not someone who knows even rudimentary physics.
Originally posted by Pimander
Here is a question for you to duck. If you aren't trying to deceive members into thinking you know more than you do, answer it. Or are you worried people might think you are a fraud?
So, what year did you first visit the range/Groome Lake, Mr Gariac. How many years out of date is your UNPROVEN testimony that there are no non-conventional tests. Or are you going to keep that from the members?