It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

It's already begun?The reverse of the Magnetic Poles.Sun and Earth.

page: 6
21
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 23 2012 @ 05:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chamberf=6
reply to post by heineken
 


So we should "wake up" to the thread topic that solar pole reversals are related to Earth pole reversals, too?
edit on 1/23/2012 by Chamberf=6 because: spelling like crap today


hey

im just replying the these posts..

Xcalibur254

"Well for one your link regarding the solar maximum is out of date. The next solar maximum isn't scheduled until spring 2013 and it is predicted to be the least active solar maximum in recent memory. Second, a geomagnetic reversal takes a long time to complete. We're talking over the course of thousands of years. There is absolutely no correlation between a geomagnetic reversal and the solar maximum."

AgentSmith

This happens every 11 years and even during the last event we had a relatively 'hard time'. The only difference this time is thanks to the Internet now being commonplace more people are finding out about this 'extraordinary event' that has happened at least once if not several times in the person's lifetime (depending upon their age obviously).

Some of the sunspots in the last cycle make this one look pretty tame...


pls dont try to obscure my facts

thanks




posted on Jan, 23 2012 @ 05:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chamberf=6
reply to post by heineken
 


So we should "wake up" to the thread topic that solar pole reversals are related to Earth pole reversals, too?
edit on 1/23/2012 by Chamberf=6 because: spelling like crap today


if you feel so comfortable with this topic reply to my first post on this thread at page 5

and please come back with evidence...like i did


edit on 23-1-2012 by heineken because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 23 2012 @ 05:27 PM
link   
reply to post by Chamberf=6
 



And you give me a quote about biological complexity.
Sometimes we can explain things by giving examples reported to the complexity of the arguments incomprehensible by others because of the finesse of the argument.




Irreducible complexity is one of two main arguments used by intelligent



posted on Jan, 23 2012 @ 05:29 PM
link   
reply to post by diamondsmith
 





Textbecause of the finesse of the argument.


Where is the "finesse" in your arguments?
edit on 1/23/2012 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 23 2012 @ 05:31 PM
link   
reply to post by heineken
 



AgentSmith
Oh my God this was addressed to me?



posted on Jan, 23 2012 @ 05:31 PM
link   
reply to post by heineken
 


You may call it evidence that solar pole reversal causes Earth pole reversal.

I disagree.



posted on Jan, 23 2012 @ 05:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by diamondsmith
reply to post by the2ofusr1
 



I put a drop of crazy glue on my fridge magnets
I gathered mine and they are more than 100.



My fridge magnets are 1.2 Tesla, about 54,000 Gauss (or 8Kg/cm of fridge).
I am prepared for the worst



posted on Jan, 23 2012 @ 05:46 PM
link   
reply to post by playswithmachines
 



My fridge magnets are 1.2 Tesla, about 54,000 Gauss (or 8Kg/cm of fridge). I am prepared for the worst
Then you are safe,no worries in case that.....



posted on Jan, 23 2012 @ 05:53 PM
link   
reply to post by heineken
 



Some of the sunspots in the last cycle make this one look pretty tame... pls dont try to obscure my facts
For now,I agree,except the + of technology that we have and that could be more harmful then the event itself.



posted on Jan, 23 2012 @ 06:06 PM
link   
reply to post by diamondsmith
 


The document you linked to had no mention of of the words: magnetic, magnetism or pole.

How does it relate in any way to your posts or support your thesis that the Sun's pole shifts influence the Earths?


edit on 23/1/2012 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 23 2012 @ 06:12 PM
link   
reply to post by chr0naut
 



He is probably referring to the Time Cube
Nor has this that I quoted,
But,




: What Are the Components of the Earth’s System? The Earth is a dynamic system, constantly changing as matter and energy are transferred among its different parts. It includes the following subsystems


For a better understanding of the primary Earth's components which is more related to the topic then the "time cube".



posted on Jan, 23 2012 @ 06:21 PM
link   
diamondsmith, with respect, you did this with your "it's really the year 2000, not 2012" thread.

You put forward a poor argument, then link to articles which have nothing to do with your original argument, and we end up going round in circles getting frustrated and confused.

You need to start explaining yourself more clearly and link to useful pages supporting your argument.



posted on Jan, 23 2012 @ 06:26 PM
link   
reply to post by woogleuk
 



You need to start explaining yourself more clearly and link to useful pages supporting your argument.
I already explained that,and I will further bring arguments when the time will be right as I stated there ,in conformity with the events and the manner of....



posted on Jan, 23 2012 @ 06:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by diamondsmith
reply to post by chr0naut
 



He is probably referring to the Time Cube
Nor has this that I quoted,
But,




: What Are the Components of the Earth’s System? The Earth is a dynamic system, constantly changing as matter and energy are transferred among its different parts. It includes the following subsystems


For a better understanding of the primary Earth's components which is more related to the topic then the "time cube".

Yes, I apologize, mine was an off topic attempt at humor.

What's your excuse?



posted on Jan, 23 2012 @ 06:30 PM
link   
reply to post by chr0naut
 



What's your excuse
Well stated arguments in civilized manner.



posted on Jan, 23 2012 @ 06:50 PM
link   
the OP is the biggest troll i have seen on ATS in quite a while, They post nonsense and garbage. Their replies dont make sense and most of the OP's statements are contradicted by the VERY MATERIAL they have provided in the links. Its almost like they rushed the whole thing and only threw the links in for fluff hoping nobody would read the actual contents. Look at the terminology in the title. Ambiguous much??

This site is being polluted by these over hyped and emotional threads. That degrade in to nothing more than pointless banter back and forth with no real discussion because the only thing the OP in concerned with is creating a distraction. Look at their post history and all the threads they have authored. You people are in such a rush to prove the OP wrong you dont stop to think that maybe this is all a game to them.


Originally posted by woogleuk
diamondsmith, with respect, you did this with your "it's really the year 2000, not 2012" thread.

You put forward a poor argument, then link to articles which have nothing to do with your original argument, and we end up going round in circles getting frustrated and confused.

You need to start explaining yourself more clearly and link to useful pages supporting your argument.




"Clever girl" Now ask yourself are they doing this on purpose or do they have a mental disorder and this is actually how they process information.

At the end of the day why are you engaging this person if you already know their modus operanda??
edit on 23-1-2012 by TiM3LoRd because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 23 2012 @ 06:56 PM
link   
reply to post by TiM3LoRd
 
To be on topic I give enough arguments,but,INSULTING OTHERS IT'S NOT RESPECTFUL,and yes a reversal of the magnetic poles is imminent both Sun and Earth as the facts show.



posted on Jan, 23 2012 @ 07:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by diamondsmith
reply to post by TiM3LoRd
 
To be on topic I give enough arguments,but,INSULTING OTHERS IT'S NOT RESPECTFUL,and yes a reversal of the magnetic poles is imminent both Sun and Earth as the facts show.



I have not insulted you merely make my thoughts on your legitimacy as a real participant on the forum public. In order for us to stay on point of the topic you first need to engage the topic in a logical and linear fashion. You have played this game before and i unlike most of the users on this forum have a memory. Im merely using that memory to remind people of your general strategy. im sorry if this upsets but all im doing is pointing out the obvious.



posted on Jan, 23 2012 @ 07:02 PM
link   
reply to post by SpongeBeard
 


Youd be suprised how much information an avid mind can process from images, even split seconds of viewing. Lol



posted on Jan, 23 2012 @ 07:02 PM
link   
reply to post by TiM3LoRd
 





the only thing the OP in concerned with is creating a distraction. Look at their post history and all the threads they have authored. You people are in such a rush to prove the OP wrong you dont stop to think that maybe this is all a game to them.


Oh, I know.

Just trying a little to make him regret posting stuff like he has all thread.


It's entertaining to see him make himself look like....erm, like he does.




top topics



 
21
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join