It's already begun?The reverse of the Magnetic Poles.Sun and Earth.

reply to post by diamondsmith


How does that prove anything you have been saying about the Sun and Earth's pole reversals?

How does that relate to you saying that the "future will end in 2012"?

reply to post by jonnywhite

We depend on computers too much. We kill things too much. There're too many of us. We can't seem to do what we need to do on our own. So nature is going to have to do it for us.

We all have the right to a life on this planet no matter how many we are,and computers try to improve our lives and yes maybe we depend and rely to much on them.

reply to post by diamondsmith

We don't know how to live. We don't know how to care. We don't connect with animals anymore. We're ever indulgent monster consumers. Nature won't allow us to be this way for long.

Everyone knows it but they won't say it. They'll only admit it when it's too late.

Everything we have is going to be taken away from us until we learn to be true to ourselves.

-I- don't want the world to end. It's the combined feeling of all humanity. It's not my doing.

reply to post by jonnywhite

Everything we have is going to be taken away from us until we learn to be true to ourselves.

Maybe we will have a chance, I pray for this,and I hope the damage will be limited.

reply to post by diamondsmith

Nature doesn't understand mercy. It has no rulebook about that sort of thing.

All it does is keep track of the numbers. It culls without emotion.

So if you're hoping for a god to speak to us before the slaughter then you'll be disappointed.

There're rules within rules. Things we do not understand yet. It's a nature program. All of life around us is partly the product of this nature program. It's incomprehensible to us. But somehow the mind of all humanity is reflected in these consequences. Humans have judged themselves, to effect. The end times are coming at our behest. In the same way, a drug user judges themselves to be lacking.

When the wave of disaster comes many will welcome it. That's what many do not understand. In sum, much of humanity has a deathwish only to be met by the mighty hand of nature's wrath.

reply to post by jonnywhite

There're rules within rules. Things we do not understand yet. It's a nature program. All of life around us is partly the product of this nature program. It's incomprehensible to us.

Depend of the point of view,we can address the problem from many points of view.Maybe we don't fit in nature's program.

Of course the poles are reversing, it is a known fact. The fact is though, they reverse at a very slow rate, thousands, if not tens of thousands of years. The last time they switched man was walking the Earth, and there is no evidence to suggest that any disastrous effects happened.

The worst that will happen is you will get lost if trying to follow your compass.

reply to post by woogleuk

Of course the poles are reversing, it is a known fact. The fact is though, they reverse at a very slow rate, thousands, if not tens of thousands of years

I hope you are right ,though we as humans didn't experienced a pole shift until now ,the question is how the other planets from the solar system take a reverse of the magnetic poles as a cycle ,all of them,and maybe we can realize what could happen.

Originally posted by diamondsmith
reply to post by woogleuk

 

Of course the poles are reversing, it is a known fact. The fact is though, they reverse at a very slow rate, thousands, if not tens of thousands of years

I hope you are right ,though we as humans didn't experienced a pole shift until now ,the question is how the other planets from the solar system take a reverse of the magnetic poles as a cycle ,all of them,and maybe we can realize what could happen.

He also said

The last time the switched man was walking the Earth, and there is no evidence to suggest that any disastrous effects happened.

Also are you sure we are experiencing that now?

Magnetic north moves, sure, but pole reversal happening now?
Source?

If we are in the middle of a 1000's of years process, it is not just now that we are experiencing it. Past peoples would have experienced it as well as future humanity.

reply to post by Chamberf=6

Magnetic north moves, sure, but pole reversal happening now? Source?

TextThe 2011 earthquake off the Pacific coast of Tōhoku (東北地方太平洋沖地震 Tōhoku-chihō Taiheiyō Oki Jishin?),[6] also known as the 2011 Tohoku earthquake,[7] or the Great East Japan Earthquake,[8][9][fn 1] was a magnitude 9.0 (Mw) undersea megathrust earthquake off the coast of Japan that occurred at 14:46 JST (05:46 UTC) on Friday, 11 March 2011,[2][3][10] with the epicenter approximately 70 kilometres (43 mi) east of the Oshika Peninsula of Tōhoku and the hypocenter at an underwater depth of approximately 32 km (20 mi).[2][11] It was the most powerful known earthquake ever to have hit Japan, and one of the five most powerful earthquakes in the world since modern record-keeping began in 1900.[10][12][13] The earthquake triggered powerful tsunami waves that reached heights of up to 40.5 metres (133 ft) in Miyako in Tōhoku's Iwate Prefecture,[14][15] and which, in the Sendai area, travelled up to 10 km (6 mi) inland.[16] The earthquake moved Honshu 2.4 m (8 ft) east and shifted the Earth on its axis by estimates of between 10 cm (4 in) and 25 cm (10 in).[17][18][19]

source(en.wikipedia.org...

reply to post by diamondsmith


How is the Earths axis shifting slightly due to an earthquake, in any way related to pole shifting??

I think you are getting confused with crust displacement theory.

reply to post by woogleuk

How is the Earths axis shifting slightly due to an earthquake

I think the magnetic poles reversal caused that earthquake any many other,they are all related and interconnected.

reply to post by diamondsmith

"I think the magnetic poles reversal caused that earthquake any many other,they are all related and interconnected.

I understand the phrase "they are all related and interconnected".

But what the heck does "I think the magnetic poles reversal caused that earthquake any many other" mean?

And you have been going on about how the pole reversal of the Sun will somehow (no real connection given by you) make the Earth's poles suddenly reverse.

Now earthquakes do it too?

Strong earthquakes can alter the axis slightly, but what do they have to do with Geo-magnetism?

reply to post by Chamberf=6

but what do they have to do with Geo-magnetism

TextBeginning in the 1950s, scientists like Victor Vacquier, using magnetic instruments (magnetometers) adapted from airborne devices developed during World War II to detect submarines, began recognizing odd magnetic variations across the ocean floor. This finding, though unexpected, was not entirely surprising because it was known that basalt—the iron-rich, volcanic rock making up the ocean floor—contains a strongly magnetic mineral (magnetite) and can locally distort compass readings. This distortion was recognized by Icelandic mariners as early as the late 18th century. More important, because the presence of magnetite gives the basalt measurable magnetic properties, these newly discovered magnetic variations provided another means to study the deep ocean floor. When newly formed rock cools, such magnetic materials recorded the Earth's magnetic field at the time. As more and more of the seafloor was mapped during the 1950s, the magnetic variations turned out not to be random or isolated occurrences, but instead revealed recognizable patterns. When these magnetic patterns were mapped over a wide region, the ocean floor showed a zebra-like pattern: one stripe with normal polarity and the adjoining stripe with reversed polarity. The overall pattern, defined by these alternating bands of normally and reversely polarized rock, became known as magnetic striping, and was published by Ron G. Mason and co-workers in 1961, who didn't find, though, an explanation for these data in terms of sea floor spreading, like Vine, Matthews and Morley a few years later.[45] The discovery of magnetic striping called for an explanation. In the early 1960s scientists such as Heezen, Hess and Dietz had begun to theorise that mid-ocean ridges mark structurally weak zones where the ocean floor was being ripped in two lengthwise along the ridge crest (see the previous paragraph). New magma from deep within the Earth rises easily through these weak zones and eventually erupts along the crest of the ridges to create new oceanic crust. This process, at first denominated the "conveyer belt hypothesis" and later called seafloor spreading, operating over many millions of years continues to form new ocean floor all across the 50,000 km-long system of mid–ocean ridges. Only four years after the maps with the "zebra pattern" of magnetic stripes were published, the link between sea floor spreading and these patterns was correctly placed, independently by Lawrence Morley, and by Fred Vine and Drummond Matthews, in 1963[46] now called the Vine-Matthews-Morley hypothesis. This hypothesis linked these patterns to geomagnetic reversals and was supported by several lines of evidence:[47] the stripes are symmetrical around the crests of the mid-ocean ridges; at or near the crest of the ridge, the rocks are very young, and they become progressively older away from the ridge crest; the youngest rocks at the ridge crest always have present-day (normal) polarity; stripes of rock parallel to the ridge crest alternate in magnetic polarity (normal-reversed-normal, etc.), suggesting that they were formed during different epochs documenting the (already known from independent studies) normal and reversal episodes of the Earth's magnetic field. By explaining both the zebra-like magnetic striping and the construction of the mid-ocean ridge system, the seafloor spreading hypothesis (SFS) quickly gained converts and represented another major advance in the development of the plate-tectonics theory. Furthermore, the oceanic crust now came to be appreciated as a natural "tape recording" of the history of the geomagnetic field reversals (GMFR) of the Earth's magnetic field. Nowadays, extensive studies are dedicated to the calibration of the normal-reversal patterns in the oceanic crust on one hand and known timescales derived from the dating of basalt layers in sedimentary sequences (magnetostratigraphy) on the other, to arrive at estimates of past spreading rates and plate reconstructions.

source(en.wikipedia.org...

reply to post by diamondsmith

In all of that above it had nothing to do with my asking "what do earthquakes have to do with pole reversal or Geo-magnetism?"

reply to post by Chamberf=6

what do earthquakes have to do with pole reversal or Geo-magnetism

TextThis is an ongoing ‘live’ project (started on 02/03/2011, prompted by the N. Zealand earthquake) to establish if there is a link between the geomagnetic activity (magnetic storms) and acceleration of the earthquake’s occurrence. It is not claimed that geomagnetic storm is a primary cause of any earthquake. However if conditions for an earthquake are ‘ripe’, then solar storm could be a trigger (not the cause) for it, and bring it forward for few hours or days.

source(tallbloke.wordpress.com...

TextRadiation Storm: The solar proton levels are now on the rise following the solar flare. A Strong S3 Level radiation storm is now in progress. This is the strongest proton event in about 7 years. ALERT: Proton Event 10MeV Integral Flux exceeded 1000pfu Begin Time: 2012 Jan 23 0855 UTC NOAA Scale: S3 - Strong

source(solarham.com...

reply to post by diamondsmith

It is not claimed that geomagnetic storm is a primary cause of any earthquake.

Nor does it say anything about earthquakes that cause the axis to slightly tilt or that this makes the poles reverse.

Originally posted by diamondsmith

TextRadiation Storm: The solar proton levels are now on the rise following the solar flare. A Strong S3 Level radiation storm is now in progress. This is the strongest proton event in about 7 years. ALERT: Proton Event 10MeV Integral Flux exceeded 1000pfu Begin Time: 2012 Jan 23 0855 UTC NOAA Scale: S3 - Strong

source(solarham.com...

Did the "future end" 7 years ago? Or the time before that?

reply to post by Chamberf=6

Did the "future end" 7 years ago? Or the time before that?

Yes this is a very strong argument to combat what I have stated and a very scientific one as all the arguments presented until now.