It's already begun?The reverse of the Magnetic Poles.Sun and Earth.

reply to post by Xcalibur254

the reply

TextThere is a growing body of evidence that changes in the geomagnetic field affect biological systems. Studies indicate that physically stressed human biological systems may respond to fluctuations in the geomagnetic field. Interest and concern in this subject have led the International Union of Radio Science to create a new commission entitled Commission K — Electromagnetics in Biology and Medicine.

source(en.wikipedia.org...

Still gives me a headache!

TextThe South Atlantic Anomaly is of great significance to astronomical satellites and other spacecraft that orbit the Earth at several hundred kilometers altitude; these orbits take satellites through the anomaly periodically, exposing them to several minutes of strong radiation, caused by the trapped protons in the inner Van Allen belt. The International Space Station, orbiting with an inclination of 51.6°, requires extra shielding to deal with this problem. The Hubble Space Telescope does not take observations while passing through the SAA.[6] Astronauts are also affected by this region which is said to be the cause of peculiar 'shooting stars' (phosphenes) seen in the visual field of astronauts.[7] Passing through the South Atlantic Anomaly is thought[8] to be the reason for the early failures of the Globalstar network's satellites. The PAMELA experiment, while passing through the SAA, detected antiproton levels that were orders of magnitude higher than those expected from normal particle decay. This suggests the Van Allen belt confines antiparticles produced by the interaction of the Earth's upper atmosphere with cosmic rays.[9] NASA has reported that modern laptops have crashed when the space shuttle flights passed through the anomaly.[10]

source(en.wikipedia.org...

reply to post by FissionSurplus

Because Earth and the Sun do not exist in a vacuum, and the Sun is a heck of a lot bigger,

Uhhhh?
Somebody NASA!
Darm they could have rolled the windows down on the shuttle years ago. Imagine the wind burn at 17,000 mph!

reply to post by Chamberf=6

Did the Earth endure mass destruction from natural disasters or flip poles in 2001?

No it didn't,but that doesn't mean that it may not happen,we must take every possibility in consideration,we will make a mistake if we cannot accept to imagine such a case scenario.

reply to post by reficul

the pictures sure are pretty

This picture is far more pretty and dangerous,

TextSolar wind flowing from the indicated coronal hole should reach Earth on Jan

source(spaceweather.com...

source(spaceweather.com...

reply to post by diamondsmith

This picture is far more pretty and dangerous,

CME's hit Earth fairly often.

Where do you come up with "dangerous"?

reply to post by Chamberf=6

NO.

TextThe world is overdue a ferocious 'space storm' that could knock out communications satellites, ground aircraft and trigger blackouts - causing hundreds of billions of pounds of damage, scientists say. Astronomers today warned that mankind is now more vulnerable to a major solar storm than at any time in history - and that the planet should prepare for a global Katrina-style disaster. A massive eruption of the sun would save waves of radiation and charged particles to Earth, damaging the satellite systems used for synchronising computers, airline navigation and phone networks. Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk...

source(http:/ /www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1359136/Global-Katrina-Biggest-solar-storm-cause-power-cuts-MONTHS.html

reply to post by Chamberf=6

CME's hit Earth fairly often.

Yes,but this year will reach a peak in CME's,a very dangerous one,

TextRADIATION STORM IN PROGRESS: Solar protons accelerated by this morning's M9-class solar flare are streaming past Earth. On the NOAA scale of radiation storms, this one ranks S3, which means it could, e.g., cause isolated reboots of computers onboard Earth-orbiting satellites and interfere with polar radio communications. ALMOST-X FLARE AND CME (UPDATED): This morning, Jan. 23rd around 0359 UT, big sunspot 1402 erupted, producing a long-duration M9-class solar flare. The explosion's M9-ranking puts it on the threshold of being an X-flare, the most powerful kind. NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory captured the flare's extreme ultraviolet flash:

source(spaceweather.com...

reply to post by Xcalibur254

Well for one your link regarding the solar maximum is out of date

TextThe unreliability of solar maxima predictions is demonstrated in that NASA had previously predicted the solar maximum for 2010/2011 and possibly to occur as late as 2012. Previously, on March 10, 2006, NASA researchers had announced that the next solar maximum would be the strongest since the historic maximum in 1859

source(en.wikipedia.org...

reply to post by diamondsmith

Yes,but this year will reach a peak in CME's,a very dangerous one,

Well I give you props for beating the fear-drums as loudly as you can, while still conveniently avoiding any data that contradicts your "warning".

Originally posted by diamondsmith
reply to post by Chamberf=6

 

NO.

TextThe world is overdue a ferocious 'space storm' that could knock out communications satellites, ground aircraft and trigger blackouts - causing hundreds of billions of pounds of damage, scientists say. Astronomers today warned that mankind is now more vulnerable to a major solar storm than at any time in history - and that the planet should prepare for a global Katrina-style disaster. A massive eruption of the sun would save waves of radiation and charged particles to Earth, damaging the satellite systems used for synchronising computers, airline navigation and phone networks. Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk...

source(http:/ /www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1359136/Global-Katrina-Biggest-solar-storm-cause-power-cuts-MONTHS.html

What you isolated and quoted from me was an answer to the question I asked:

Did you even read your own sources?
Did the Earth endure mass destruction from natural disasters or flip poles in 2000?
NO.

Then you added a sensationalist source quote from Feb. 2011. Did all that happen last year?

NO, again.

reply to post by Chamberf=6

any data that contradicts your "warning".

No one have such data just past history of the events to study,and depending on it to see what will be,but why to think before is happen ,we will have a lot of time long after,how many will remain of us.

reply to post by diamondsmith


then what?! what are gonna do when the sh#t goes down? survive? ask a t-rex about that

Originally posted by diamondsmith
reply to post by Xcalibur254

 

Well for one your link regarding the solar maximum is out of date

TextThe unreliability of solar maxima predictions is demonstrated in that NASA had previously predicted the solar maximum for 2010/2011 and possibly to occur as late as 2012. Previously, on March 10, 2006, NASA researchers had announced that the next solar maximum would be the strongest since the historic maximum in 1859

source(en.wikipedia.org...

Also from your same Wikipedia "source":

The last solar maximum was in 2000. The next solar maximum is currently predicted to occur in February 2013 and to be one of the weakest cycles since 1928.[2]

en.wikipedia.org...

reply to post by Chamberf=6

NO, again.

YES,again,I gave enough info but of course we are not prepared and nothing will change an event that is about to happen.

reply to post by diamondsmith

No one have such data just past history of the events to study,

The history and what the sun has been doing since it has been studied is data.

and depending on it to see what will be,but why to think before is happen ,we will have a lot of time long after,how many will remain of us.

What does that even mean?

reply to post by reficul

survive

The big differences between global thermonuclear war, and a solar event or meteor impact will be that a meteor won't have radiation with it. An event from the sun, if severe enough can cause high radiation levels. But unlike a global atomic war, radiation from a CME will virtually cover the entire earth. And it might actually be worse in some respects than a nuclear war, but not as long lasting.

source(www.rense.com...

Originally posted by diamondsmith
reply to post by Chamberf=6

 

NO, again.

YES,again,I gave enough info but of course we are not prepared and nothing will change an event that is about to happen.

What you have been giving is cherry picked quotes from old and outdated sources taken out of context of the rest of the source.

You even did that in quoting me:

Then you added a sensationalist source quote from Feb. 2011. Did all that happen last year?
NO, again.

Unless you are saying all of the following really did happen last year...

eruption of the sun would save waves of radiation and charged particles to Earth, damaging the satellite systems used for synchronising computers, airline navigation and phone networks.

btw the source apparently wasn't even proof-read

sun would save waves of radiation

it would "save" waves?

reply to post by Chamberf=6

taken out of context

We always see what we wan't to see,depending on many factors related psychological environment in which the statement was made and the context of the persons involved!!

Originally posted by diamondsmith
reply to post by Chamberf=6

 

taken out of context

We always see what we wan't to see,depending on many factors related psychological environment in which the statement was made and the context of the persons involved!!

So you do admit to taking your source quotes out of the context they were written in?

Finally some truth in your responses.