SC Attorney General has notified the U.S. Justice Department of potential voter fraud (not in primar, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times
Topic started on 23-1-2012 @ 01:38 AM by Swills
Edit: I did find a mention of this in a recent thread & it redirects to this thread from 1/11/12, so this isn't as "breaking" as it seems. These voters did not vote in the primaries, but still raises suspicions. I wonder how well they looked after the recent voting process. I hope they investigate all of the recent votes and match them up against that data base that discovered these dead voters.

Going by the numbers I saw on Politico.com there look to be under a million votes cast in SC Saturday and according to SC 2010 census there are over 3 million 18+, give or take an illegal alien and felon. So really, every vote counts! This does not help my faith in the democratic process

South Carolina's Attorney General, Alan Wilson has notified the U.S. Justice Department of potential voter fraud.


www.foxnews.com...

COLUMBIA, S.C. – South Carolina's attorney general has notified the U.S. Justice Department of potential voter fraud.

Attorney General Alan Wilson sent details of an analysis by the Department of Motor Vehicles to U.S. Attorney Bill Nettles.

In a letter dated Thursday, Wilson says the analysis found 953 ballots cast by voters listed as dead. In 71 percent of those cases, ballots were cast between two months and 76 months after the people died. That means they "voted" up to 6 1/3 years after their death.

The letter doesn't say in which elections the ballots were cast.

The analysis came out of research for the state's new voter identification law. The U.S. Justice Department denied clearance of that law.

Wilson told Nettles he asked the State Law Enforcement Division to investigate.

Read more: www.foxnews.com...


Related article,
charlotte.cbslocal.com...

edit on 23-1-2012 by Swills because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 23-1-2012 @ 01:57 AM by Swills
reply to post by cconn487



Yeah man, I agree with you 100%. If one vote is fraud, intentional fraud, you could argue a case of a re-vote, I guess. In this case we have over 900, that we know of. Newt's amazing victory was pretty damn suspicious and this isn't helping the his case at all.

Can there be a re-do? Is that even in the rule books? Has such an scenario ever come up?
edit on 23-1-2012 by Swills because: (no reason given)


Pages:     ^^TOP^^



People are marching in the streets all over Quebec
  Posted 5 days ago with 72 member flags
Breaking: Ron Paul to end active campaigning - cnn
  Posted 15 days ago with 26 member flags
Anon has released 1.7 GB of files....
  Posted 8 days ago with 24 member flags
Police Tasings Might Finally Be Ruled Brutality
  Posted 14 days ago with 23 member flags
US judge blocks indefinite detention of Americans
  Posted 13 days ago with 21 member flags
Ron Paul, Adam Smith Push To End Indefinite Detention Of Americans
  Posted 13 days ago with 20 member flags
The Vetting Breitbart - Obama : Born in Kenya
  Posted 12 days ago with 18 member flags