posted on Jan, 23 2012 @ 01:16 AM
- Why are pyramids always found in landlocked areas and stone circles found near the sea?
- Why did the builders use 1,300 ton stones IN PREFERENCE TO small ones? How did it make I easier to move and install them?
- Why are there always chips broken off the corners of stone obelisks, usually high up where nothing will hit them?
- Why are there always long straight, wide avenues leading to pyramids in the Mayan, Egyptian etc. cities?
- What is the benefit of having pyramids a basically conical shape?
- Why are there traces of salt and possible hydrogen production in the pyramids?
- Why would gliders be built that would be a pain to launch?
- Why are stone circles like Stonehenge always have an associated smaller circle and why is there always a stone duct laid in the ground connecting
them?
- Why was Stonehenge abandoned almost immediately after nearby small circle was moved by priests and installed within the main major circle? Did this
intended enhancement cause it to become useless?
- Why are stones in stone circles often magnetic?
- Is it not coincidental that the “Manna” is both the name of what sustained the Jews in the desert AND the power that moved the Moai Statues of
Easter Island into place?
- Why have landing strips and lines on the desert when spacecraft would land vertically, not horizontally?
I have just realised how to move blocks of stone of up to 7,000 tons across the world and up near vertical mountain sides with no wheels, no roads, no
rivers, no aeroplanes, no earth moving equipment, no anti-grav machines and no magic nor spiritual forces... and it solves all the above questions.
To do so, would need access to:-
- Half a mile of straight, very wide road with stepped buildings on either side (which Copan has)
- A limitless supply of timber
- Bronze or stone axes
- Limestone
- A workforce of about a thousand
- A tall stone obelisk or two.
Given this, within a couple of decades, it would be possible to construct the pyramids, put the Moai statues into place, survey Antarctica yet leave
no direct trace of how this was done, with the exception of also having to build places such as Stonehenge to facilitate this.
I have already done the mathematics on this and it precisely fits with the evidence.
I would be delighted for an opportunity to demonstrate how Ancient Aliens could have done this using an unskilled, backward workforce.
The Theory… Manna that fed the Jews in the Wilderness and moved the Moai statues into place is not food nor a magical force…
Manna are Zeppelins
Wood-framed and filled with Hydrogen, a Zeppelin of 0.6 miles (the length of the street down the centre of Copan) would have a lift capacity of
approximately 7,000 tons.
To construct, wooden beams would have been bolted together to run laterally from one step level of a temple across to the other side to allow a
semi-circular frame to be built. Once a sequence of semi-cicles had been made, half of these could have been inverted and bolted onto the top of the
other to produce a sequence of frames twice the height of the temples.
Once a chain of these is made, fabric is stretched over it and filled with hydrogen. There is clear evidence of hydrogen production in the Great
Pyramid of Egypt and has an exit point, high up, in the “roof” of the pyramid – prefect for pumping hydrogen into a Zeppelin above. To hold it
ion place, any normal tree would be uprooted, so a stone tether would have been needed, namely an obelisk.
Stability concerns would have made it mandatory for the stones moved as cargo to be as large as possible to prevent movement onboard.
With a top speed when even driven by petrol engines of about 50 miles per hour, an ancient Zeppelin would have been exceptionally slow, making it
highly advantageous for accurate placing of stones, and, likewise, fears of hitting trees etc, would have made it preferable to build high up on
hillsides than flying low in valleys, hence the stones laid are near the top of vertical drops.
Since the construction would have been primative, leakage would have been a long term problem. After crossing the Atlantic, ancient Zeppelins would
have had urgent need of hydrogen, but no easily accessible resources would have been available. To these end, stone circles like Stonehenge would be
necessary. By having horses running around on the tops of the lintels of Stonehenge, a central rota spun with copper wiring could be turned, making
Stonehenge the world’s largest alternator to electrolyse salt water from the nearby coast. The large circle is cabled to a smaller circle (known to
exist near the river) allowing water to be electrically pumped by using the electricity generated. As the small circle is smaller than the large one,
the power would have been more concentrated, allowing it to be used also as an electrically powered milling machine to allow the ancient to carry out
repair work on their Zeppelins. It is interesting to note that stone circles only occur where horses do and in Ancient Britain, the horse was a
supreme God.
With access to these Zeppelins, Ancients could travel the world, needing only to put up obelisks at places where they needed or wanted to stop so that
their Zeppelin could be anchored. As a result of roping up the Zeppelin, where the ropes cut in during stormy times would have caused the chipping at
the corners high up on the obelisks.
And where no obelisk preexisted, a glider could have been launched to allow those onboard have ground crew to fix an obelisk into the ground at an
intended new landing place.
With a Zeppelin, those on board would never have had to fear attackers on the ground, hence Moses could have been resupplied in the desert by ferrying
food from elsewhere.
And why have Ancient Astronaut theorists thought of this before? Because many of the images thought to be cigar-shaped UFO’s on ancient texts and
carvings are actually the “Manna” or Zeppelins.