posted on Jan, 24 2012 @ 12:43 PM
Originally posted by GenRadek
A movie? Great! Will it be classified as a comedy? Comedy drama maybe?
What the OP neglects to mention is that this is yet another Richard Gage hack job, and it's little more than Gage holding an imaginary new
investigation where he imagines himself to be the star eyewitness, and imagines that he actually represents the families of 9/11. To noone's
surprise, this imaginary interview is chock full of the "free fall" and "Building what" nonsense Gage has been putting out all along, and everyone
is fawning over him like school girls with a crush on their teacher.
Here's an excerpt from the script, as shown from the ae911truth web site. JUDGE ALAN EISNER is Chairman of the investigation, DR. ELLA SLOAN is the
President’s Science Advisor, MRS. KATHY SAWYER is a representative of family members of the 9/11 victims. DR. SINGER is with NIST.
"MRS. SAWYER: Excuse me Mr. Chairman, but we have a big problem with Dr. Singer’s testimony.
CHAIRMAN EISNER: Which part of it?
MRS. SAWYER: All of it.
CHAIRMAN EISNER: What do your experts say?
MRS. SAWYER: Let me introduce Mr. Richard Gage, AIA, a member of the American Institute of Architects and founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11
CHAIRMAN EISNER: Mr. Gage, what sparked your interest in 9/11?
MR. GAGE: In 2006, I caught an interview with Dr. David Ray Griffin that changed my life. He was describing the oral histories from dozens of New York
City firefighters that had recently been released due to a court order.
CHAIRMAN EISNER: Then what happened?
MR. GAGE: I started watching videos on the Internet of the buildings collapsing, looking for signs of explosives. You can actually see them going off,
all around the buildings, just like the firefighters said.
CHAIRMAN EISNER: You're saying the evidence for explosives has always been there right in front of our eyes?
MR. GAGE: Everyone saw the Twin Towers brought down in a way that could only have been caused by explosives. We were just told differently by the
government and the media - and then further deceived by the 9/11 Commission and NIST.
DR. SLOAN: What would the explosives have been used for?
MR. GAGE: To remove the steel columns so they didn’t offer any resistance to the floors falling from above. That’s why the buildings came down at
nearly free-fall acceleration.
DR. SLOAN: By free-fall do you mean as fast as if you dropped a bowling ball from the roof and it fell down to the ground without any resistance?
MR. GAGE: It's basic physics - the same laws of physics Isaac Newton discovered over 300 years ago.
DR. SLOAN: So if NIST's fire theory violates these laws then it must be wrong?
MR. GAGE: Not even George W. Bush could have written a signing statement that can invalidate the laws of physics.
DR. SLOAN: However, on the other hand, I believe you’re saying the theory that the Towers were brought down by explosives in a controlled demolition
does not violate these laws?
MR. GAGE: That's right. Something that can't be explained in terms of the official story or the laws of physics is fully understandable when you
DR. SLOAN: Could there be any other explanation?
MR. GAGE: Without explosives there's no way two identical 110 story buildings could collapse in about a dozen seconds each."
You can see more of the script of this hack job at
the ae911truth web site
. It isn't a movie and it certainly isn't a documentary- it's just more of
the same horse [censored] he's been putting out all along but in a different package. There is no way, shape, or form this is ever going to make it
to any movie theaters.