Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
First off, this alleged Ministry of Defense "set of documents" went public when it fell into the hands of Norman Baker. At the time, Baker was a
member of the Joint Committee on Human Rights and considered a Liberal Democrat. So I find it difficult to believe that the Ministry of Defense just
handed over such said "set of documents" to someone on the Joint Committee of Human Rights and a Liberal. Thus....where did Baker really get it?
Then according to the Guardian and Baker, this alleged report says ...
The MoD report traces the history of the UK's research into germ warfare since the Second World War when Porton Down produced five million cattle
cakes filled with deadly anthrax spores which would have been dropped in Germany to kill their livestock. It also gives details of the infamous
anthrax experiments on Gruinard on the Scottish coast which left the island so contaminated it could not be inhabited until the late 1980s.
And at that point I realize that the "set of documents" couldn't have possibly come from the MoD. Does Baker not know his GENERAL World War II
Anthrax is a GERMAN bioweapon. The German pharmaceudical company IG Farber/Bayer created anthrax AND they had an antibiotic to it. Baker alleges in
his "MoD" report that anthrax was British and that the British were going to drop anthrax on German cattle. Why would they? It would be pointless
for the British to steal anthrax (a German creation) from the Germans to drop on German cattle when the Germans had an antibiotic to cure their own
IT HAPPENED THE OTHER WAY AROUND. Anthrax was created by IG Farber/Bayer/Germans and they were dropping it on British cattle and that's a historical
fact! And the British didn't have an antibiotic for it like the Germans did. The United States didn't have an antibiotic for it like the Germans
did. The Russians did not have an antibiotic for it like the Germans did.
So when Baker alleges that the British were going to drop a German-made bioweapon on German cattle when Germans had an antibiotic to cure it...then I
know Baker is telling a crock! Especially if he claims that the document in his hand belongs to the "MoD".
Doesn't Baker know that when the Germans had created anthrax as a bioweapon that British scientists came up with their own bioweapon in retailiation
and it definitely wasn't anthrax? Oh No. Of course not. He's blaming the British for what the Germans did-- Germans did anthrax. Not the British.
And if Baker doesn't know any names of British WWII creations in a document that he claims that came from the "MoD" and claims that the British
were the ones with anthrax, then he's a flake! If Baker knew anything then he'd be able to name ....NAME the bioweapon that the British created in
retaliation to German/IG Farber/Bayer's creation of anthrax. If Baker thinks the British made anthrax...send him back to school to learn his general
So....I'm having great difficulty believing that what Baker had in his hand was any form of a genuine MoD report on biowarfare if he can't get the
basics from WWII correct. And if a person doesn't have the basics from WWII correct then they really don't know anything. But I can see the MoD
intentionally misfeeding Baker some misinfo after that. Why not? It could be fun to give the Baker-guy some misinfo! Fun fun Fun!
The only group of people who would accuse the British of dropping anthrax on German cattle in WWII is the Germans themselves. Only the Germans thought
that. The Russians wouldn't have thought that the British would take a German bioweapon-anthrax and drop it on German cattle when Germans had the
antibiotic for it. The Americans wouldn't have thought that either.
Only the Germans thought that the British would do it, which is why the Germans began feeding livestock their antibiotic. And even today in 2012,
Germans still sell the anthrax antibiotic to livestock around the world. Baker's alleged "MoD document" on WWII biowarfare is a German document-a
German accusation of the British and not MoD at all.
But really Baker is a piece of work! He doesn't have his basic WWII facts straight, thus, how can anybody believe anything else? Oh wait! I guess
that would be the MoD intent since he likes to go public with everything-you know-feed misinformation on purpose to the guy who keeps going to the
media so he looks like a jarkarse. Since Baker is so vocal about Dr. Kelly and Dr. Kelly used to be in charge of exposing Iraqi bioweapons....he's
got a Middle Eastern stalking/following each hoping that Baker will go public with more bioweapons info. So it would be in the interest of MoD to give
Baker as much misinfo as possible since he always like to go public with it-to the media-giving "documents" to the press. YEAH THAT'S IT! ~wink~