It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AliceBlackman
reply to post by MidnightTide
How is that possible that RP got no delegates from Iowa ?
I was listening to Neil Bortz on WSB Radio the night of the Iowa cacus, where exit polls were also showing him in the lead and he said there were lots of RP supporters there waiting for the longer process to get themselves appointed as delegates.
Originally posted by Bilder
reply to post by eLPresidente
Hardly surprising that they are pulling this sh*t what is surprising is the absolute apathy shown by the population in general,you guys know RP is much more popular than the MSM is letting on but its still bussiness as usual
Originally posted by nyk537
reply to post by litterbaux
I never claimed the voting process was completely accurate...not anywhere.
My issue is with claiming that this somehow screwed Ron Paul out of some amazing victory in Iowa. Ron Paul was not going to win Iowa...no matter how many votes were lost.
Originally posted by Kristinaso
So all the voter fraud comes from Republicans?
Interesting.
Originally posted by nyk537
reply to post by The_Phantom
It's not speculation. The only votes that are under contention here are those from the missing 8 precincts. Those votes...coincidentally enough...could not have won the race for Paul even if the vast majority of them were for him.
Originally posted by nyk537
reply to post by Mimir
Wow...thanks for randomly posting two sources that really have nothing to do with the bigger point you were trying to make. Most of the sources are from non-credible places that don't lend much credibility to your theory.
Now if you would like to discuss why you believe this is true then by all means we will...but don't patronize us with this crap.
Originally posted by daaskapital
Hell Yeah, i was right I caught a lady on CNN who was counting and seemed to skip 10 numbers, from 50 to 60 or something!edit on 22-1-2012 by daaskapital because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by White Locust
When are we going to begin voting via the internet!?
Originally posted by nyk537
reply to post by litterbaux
They didn't tamper with them enough to affect Paul. You don't honestly believe Ron Paul got enough votes to win do you?