Originally posted by xuenchen
Originally posted by Salamandy
reply to post by ShockTruther
Joe P told his supervisors of what he knew. What he knew were allegations. If Joe P was wrong about these allegations when he told his bosses, he
could also have been scrutinized for false reports.
Joe P did exactly what he should of.
Guys like Mike Fransessa buried Joe P.
Why must people try to make themselves feel better by blaming innocent people for another persons vile crimes? Like if we bring down people who were
not involved, suddenly child rape will go away.
""he could also have been scrutinized for false reports"" 
WHAT ?
That's up to the police and district prosecutors.
The others who were "witnesses" are guilty also.
The whole deal was a coverup.
Remember the Victims ?
Yes I remember the victims. I also remember who committed the crimes that gave the victims their status as such. Joe P didn't commit the crimes. That
is like saying the rape victim is guilty for wearing revealing clothes.
Why scrutinize a man who actually went to his higher ups and told them of suspicious activity?
Are you saying Joe should have drawn illicit pictures or is somehow guilty for not having photo evidence on him when telling his higher ups? Isnt it
enough just to say, "hey one of my coaches may be fooling around with young kids?
Should Joe P have set up a sting operation himself? Maybe lure Sandsuky to one of his practices and hire an undercover detective dressed as a young
boy to meet Sandusky in private. Then Joe P could have seen what would have happened and personally cuffed and escorted Sandusky to the courthouse.
