Newt Gingrich Wanted the Debate to be Opened with Open Marriage Question, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times
Topic started on 21-1-2012 @ 04:26 PM by PhysicsAdept
I am not posting this because I do not think it was posted elsewhere, or that people looking at this thread haven't seen it. Just posting the video for user convenience.



Ok I am posting this because I have seen things in the past few days since the debate... Has anyone noticed the ridiculous amount of media attention that has been handed down to Newt Gingrich since the debate? All that I heard on both local and national news sources after the debate was the "bold rebuttal" Gingrich was able to supply on the opening question. Now I am not even going to post links to places where you can see this occur because it would mainly consist of thousands of YouTube videos and that would more than likely waste people's time with even more Newt propaganda.

Anyway, I get this odd feeling... this feeling that Gingrich asked or paid someone off to start the debate off with that question. He was so prepared for that question, and arguably is the main thing that is bumping his campaign right now. I mean, the public loves social problem attention. I don't know, I just think it's rigged... it would make so much sense. Thoughts?

Maybe I am just going nuts lately with all the influence the media undeservably protrudes.
edit on 21-1-2012 by PhysicsAdept because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 21-1-2012 @ 04:40 PM by WeRpeons
reply to post by PhysicsAdept



American voters eat-up theatrics in politics instead of focusing on the real issues facing this country. Of course he was prepared to answer this question before the debate. He knew the issue was going to hurt him so I'm sure his political team discussed how he could approach that question. Gingrich is comfortable in debates and he's a really good public speaker. Unfortunately, voters are swayed by this and can't look beyond a candidates questionable credentials and voting records.


reply posted on 21-1-2012 @ 05:36 PM by Son of Will
reply to post by sheepslayer247



Yes... I'm afraid you're correct. Newt didn't even make a good response - i was expecting the moderator to patiently wait for the crowd to die down and repeat the question, which he completely dodged - but somehow the audience found his self-righteous indignation more entertaining than a real answer might have been.

How is it in any way shameful to ask an honest question about a highly controversial period of his personal life? This is not an interview for part-time manager at Denny's we're talking about here, but the office of the (arguably) most powerful position on the planet. If he can't be trusted with his family, how can we trust him with an entire nation? We need details to make a good decision - if he thinks he can keep the skeletons safely inside his closet then he's not nearly as smart as I gave him credit for.


reply posted on 21-1-2012 @ 05:55 PM by PhysicsAdept
reply to post by Donahue



I was just waiting for the guy to just come out and say it:

"Well Newt, that IS what you told me to ask, I am just doing my job here."

Ha, now THAT would have made things interesting. But no, seriously, the reporter took no shame, emotionless as a rock.


reply posted on 21-1-2012 @ 05:58 PM by PhysicsAdept
reply to post by sheepslayer247



Exactly why Newt does as well as he does. Look back at nearly any previous debate. He THRIVES off of making people laugh. The only why people like him so much is because he is a comedian, not a politician. I suppose it is time to just get things out in the open, the 2016 candidates should only consist of movie stars, reality show contestants, and comedians. Hell let's go ahead and just throw Tom Brady in there as well, he can get pretty far with his pompous rich-boy smile. That's what Romney has done the whole time and it's been working nearly as good as Newt's comedy routine!



reply posted on 21-1-2012 @ 06:00 PM by PhysicsAdept
reply to post by spinalremain



I can't say I like the guy based off of what I know, but Hitler was an amazing speaker. In fact, I took a speech class in which the teacher actually forced us to watch some of his rallies. And the people loved him! He invoked so much emotion in people. I was getting partially riled up by watching him and I did not even know what he was saying, that's how the voters are of today too I would guess, like you are saying. That's why Ron Paul, though doing very well, could do better. He speaks so intelligently that sometimes I think people won't vote for him because they just don't get it haha


reply posted on 21-1-2012 @ 06:02 PM by PhysicsAdept
reply to post by Wookiep



Totally agree. And like I said, not only did he receive tremendous support from the crowd afterwards, but it was the only highlight of the entire two hour debate that I saw afterwards, on any news channel! Ron Paul didn't get any highlights, even though the crowd was forced to stand up for him when he was skipped on the abortion topic! WTH haha


reply posted on 31-1-2012 @ 07:17 PM by Drunkenshrew
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Ron Paul is NOT dropping out, the Mainstream Media is LYING.
  Posted 15 days ago with 111 member flags
Report: Romney Will Be Disqualified From Race Due To Fraud
  Posted 19 days ago with 105 member flags
Evidence of Vote Flipping in GOP Primary Elections
  Posted 7 days ago with 88 member flags
Fox News Analyst: First American to shoot down drone will be a hero
  Posted 14 days ago with 68 member flags
Mitt Romney scared Ron Paul is winning!!!
  Posted 7 days ago with 62 member flags
Let\'s just say it: Political Parties are the Problem
  Posted 12 days ago with 60 member flags
Before There Was Welfare There Was Charity
  Posted 4 days ago with 53 member flags