When we start talking about love, many times others have their own preconceptions about what love is and that may differ from ours. It seems like love is spoken in terms of needing to be defined in only one way when in reality most people know love in many different ways. I agree love is love but it is seen in many different ways not just one. Maybe in this life we can only know love by perception.

Some experience love in relationships
Some experience love by enjoying a cold beer fishing on a lake
Some experience love by doing a hobby
Etc, etc....

The way someone sees love may not be the way we see it but that doesn't change that love is love.

By love do you mean chemical reactions etc? I see no magical energy in that my friend. Lol, it's not all that hard to understand TC. That same love you feel for a loved one can be duplicated using chocolate and wine if your mood is right. With that side you can feel that emotion anytime for anyone or anything.

You and I are nothing special. You are a flesh machine made of atoms that are really energy which exist maybe on different wave lengths. It's all science, not love or anything else.

when truth conception exist, then positive superiority is a free possible equation application anywhere and anyhow

when truth conception exist then objective constant free matter is always of positive superiority fact

but when positive superiority is the free constant fact then else free sense is resulting from perceiving truth objectively, as the knowledge of all possible logics in one fact

but that free sense is else as it is not the constant free fact since out of perceiving it

while it must b a relative free sense since the constant free fact perceived is truth so there cant b else freedom

what is relative cannot be objectively existing really so that relative else free sense is not existence reason hypothetically since it cant b its justification

but that relative free sense exist individually so subjectively it is one existence of relative truth, that by definition cant b real nor existing reason

but the fact that objective existence is somehow justified allow the relative truth of one existence to exist relatively through

so how would one free individual subjective sense be constant in being through objective constant existence perceptions

in logical terms, that else free sense of relative truth cant subsist existing individually unless it pretend or play its positive superiority as real subjectively in some ways

that positive superiority reference cant b of objective existence since subject cant mean being an object

so positive superiority must b an abstract conception that allow such individual relative free sense to subsist alone

this is love, kind of relative object to relative existence individual way justifications

the individual relative free sense could justify meaning positively objective superiority
it could justify meaning superior positive objective
and it could justify being positive superior means

but that cant b constant way justifications unless the free relative sense recognize first meaning truth positive superiority

while it can b constant way justifications if the free relative sense mean that all existence is of liars creations to reach positive superiority constancy to their relative existence

so that is love existence as we perceive it and witness

the constant pretenses of positive superiority in both ways justifications, oh wat a nice watever
while noone give a # about it