It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by freedom12
reply to post by snowcrash911
My bad on replying to the wrong person!
I was simply using the materials supplied by THEDMAN above pertaining to Mr Wallace's testimony.
Using the info quoted in the above post, Mr Wallace's statements would appear to be inaccurate and would be thrown out in a court of law.
.....few feet above their heads and we all know what the engine htrust would have done to those folks.(blown them away)
Originally posted by freedom12
reply to post by snowcrash911
I'm simply stating that THEDMAN's post quotes attributed to Mr Wallace's story make his description of his account seem inaccurate sir. Nothing more, nothing less.
Please reread the quoted material THEDMAN provided in his post and you will see, I'm right.
As for the Pentagon witnesses in general, I agree with the OP as to the vast majority of the "witnesses" statements that have been made public as either inaccurate or full of problems.
Many of the witnesses, were not even in position to see the "plane" strike or had impossible statements in them. Several folks said the "plane' passed a few feet above their heads and we all know what the engine htrust would have done to those folks.(blown them away)
flames kept burning which they had a tough time putting out, and it reignited the next day after all that spraying. I'd say that's pretty abnormal for a airplane crash considering the 24 hour attention it had from the firefighters
Originally posted by TupacShakur
reply to post by pshea38
I used to be skeptical of the official story that a plane hit the Pentagon until I saw the damage left in a truck from the right engine and some sort of cement garden thing by the left engine. They both left semi-circular damage just like it would look if an engine went through them. I don't see how that could be faked.
1) go look online at videos (multiple) that you can find of the facade of the Pentagon west side before it collapsed. Ask yourself how a 757 can fit into that hole ....
What happens at 5 ft?
Originally posted by freedom12
This whole discussion could be ended by simply releasing ALL of the multiple undoctored camera footage that may have camera the plane.
Originally posted by freedom12
As many other posters have pointed out before in the many other threads on this subject, there are NO impact holes on the Pentagon from the heaviest parts of the plane.......the engines, but we supposed to believe the nose/skeleton of a lightweight mostly aluminum plane could cause a hole in specifically reinforced/newly hardened wall of the Pentagon?
Originally posted by freedom12
reply to post by Reheat
So where are the impact holes from the engines?
I clicked on you link at the bottom and briefly read it. So you are saying the 2 officers at the Citgo station are not remembering what happened right?