It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by RSF77
reply to post by justwokeup
IMHO anything that underminds MAD is a good thing, Russian, US, Chinese, Martian or whatever.
You are suggesting the US would start lobbing missiles if we had enough interceptor defense, that's only your distorted opinion. No one is stopping Russia from building their own interceptor batteries, in fact, I would support every country of the world deploying a mass of interceptors.
Having a bunch of interceptors > The end of humanity.edit on 21-1-2012 by RSF77 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Krono
Yes and russia has 1000s out of missiles trained on the rest of the world, you dont see us complaining do you?
2nd
Originally posted by Solomons
While i think the Russians are right to be a bit upset over this, i think they are overstating the capabilities of the shield to their own advantage. Unless NATO are lying through their teeth about the capabilities of the shield,
it is wholly inadequate and could quite easily be overwhelmed by Russia.
You would figure people would be happy about a nuclear missile defense anywhere. But no, if it is the US that controls the defense it's automatically bad.
The russians are paranoid.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Originally posted by Krono
Yes and russia has 1000s out of missiles trained on the rest of the world, you dont see us complaining do you?
2nd
Wrong. Under NEW START they are allowed 800 launchers. So you fail.
Originally posted by RSF77
You would figure people would be happy about a nuclear missile defense anywhere. But no, if it is the US that controls the defense it's automatically bad. Give me a break, the same people that shun these interceptors would praise Russia building actual nuclear missiles, just because of their bias against the US they would invite armageddon.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
reply to post by princeofpeace
Its looking almost possible that NATO could launch a pre-emptive first strike on Russia, take out the vast majority of their nukes and then what Russia has left can be dealt with these interceptors. Scary, scary, scary.
That's what Russia is afraid of. They know our ``leaders`` are warmongering nuts. They know what happened to them in WW2 because they thought ``Hitler cannot attack us, we have a treaty and he's not that mad``... Russia got nearly wiped off the map... they won't make that mistake again.
Originally posted by MortlitantiFMMJ
Russia is as much a warmongering nation as the west
Originally posted by wondera
reply to post by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
Georgia 2008, with that South ossettia stuff. before that wasn't it Chechnya twice in the 1990’s causing over 100,000 casualties. realative small scail in comparison but you did pose a question. but back in the soviet days
it wasn't an uncomman thing for them to do.
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
Originally posted by wondera
reply to post by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
Georgia 2008, with that South ossettia stuff. before that wasn't it Chechnya twice in the 1990’s causing over 100,000 casualties. realative small scail in comparison but you did pose a question. but back in the soviet days
it wasn't an uncomman thing for them to do.
Russia invaded Georgia in order to protect ethnic Russians that the Georgians were murdering, including both civilians and Russian peacekeepers. It was not some unprovoked attack.
Chechnya is within Russia. Chechnya is not a sovereign country. And it wasn't exactly unprovoked either.
Originally posted by MortlitantiFMMJ
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
Originally posted by wondera
reply to post by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
Georgia 2008, with that South ossettia stuff. before that wasn't it Chechnya twice in the 1990’s causing over 100,000 casualties. realative small scail in comparison but you did pose a question. but back in the soviet days
it wasn't an uncomman thing for them to do.
Russia invaded Georgia in order to protect ethnic Russians that the Georgians were murdering, including both civilians and Russian peacekeepers. It was not some unprovoked attack.
Chechnya is within Russia. Chechnya is not a sovereign country. And it wasn't exactly unprovoked either.
What about Tajikistan? Any excuses for Afghanistan?