Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Some Ron Paul Statistical Comparisons You Definitely Haven't Seen

page: 3
88
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 01:46 PM
link   
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
 
Ten years ago, that (internet/real world) would have been a valid argument. Over 78% of North America has internet access today, while in 2000 that number was down around 44%.

And the hot women walking around comment, well I guess that depends on where you live.




posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 01:54 PM
link   
By the way, RP is still winning the Drudge Report poll right now..





posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 02:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by rstregooski
reply to post by boot2theface
 


I know it, man! I have a close female friend who "likes" Ron Paul, but is going with Santorum. I showed her this clip, and she was just like, "Well, Ron Paul just isn't capable of getting the nomination">

And Sanitarium is?????

I wanted to rip my face off.

But in the end, I feel if RP can't get it done, it ain't gonna be Mitt, but rather the prominent CFR member Newt Gingrich..
edit on 21-1-2012 by rstregooski because: (no reason given)


Not unless his ex-wife does that interview after the South Carolina polls. She was claiming it could potentially end his campaign. It sure would be interesting after something like that happening.



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 02:21 PM
link   
I am always confused by the term "electability". As if we somehow know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, what every American is thinking. Polls only show trends, at best. We all know they can be skewed in a number of ways to show what they want them to. So, how does one assert that Ron Paul is not "electable"?

Is it because the MSM says so?

It reminds me of a network marketing strategy. You sign up 2, they in turn sign up 2 who goes on to sign up 2. It is really as simple as that. Speak to 2 friends about Paul. Convince them to speak about Paul to 2 of their friends. Word spreads. Ron Paul wins.

This "electability" nonsense is just that. Anyone is electable. We just have to vote for them and not worry that if we do our vote will be "wasted". It will not. I have sensed a trend here and in other places. That is a follower mentality is worming it's way into the open minds of the masses. We don't want to waste our vote so we will not give it to the one that we feel will do the best job. Why? because it is being shown in the MSM and numerous other sources that Ron Paul is a kook, a little bent or whatever negative statement they can make.

Maybe he is a little crazy. Maybe that's what this country needs is someone that will step beyond the accepted norms for government and try something like, I don't know, getting back to the constitution.



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 02:21 PM
link   
reply to post by rstregooski
 


I could be wrong but here is my opinion on what I understand from your post. I think that the reason for such high search results of the other "negative" candidates on the fox and CNN websites is because majority of the web traffic that is using their search engines are mostly the fans and viewers. Now what my educational guess is, is our generation doesn't confine in the heavily infiltrated and controlled corporate news media. We see that at this point that what they report is mostly programming that they want to program us with. So we go through alternative sites for our information and news I.e. google searches, Rense.com, twitter.com, abovetopsecret.com, etc.

Hope I don't sound like a pumpas wind bag guys, but that is what my guts is telling me. Thanks for the post.



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 02:28 PM
link   
This is interesting, but the data can't really used to determine potential votes, as previously stated a few times. I would love to get on a computer at boogle headquarters and filter searches with negative keywords and such, to get actual stats on which msm outlets prop up or bash individual potential candidates. Not to mention all the financial cross-referencing you could do at boogle.

I personally think that the established ruling body wants either obama or romney in the big seat. They both are wall street puppets as obviously determined by their campaign donor lists. I find it hilarious that all these religious zealots ignore the fact that ron paul is actually proposing a fairly accurate christian path. I'm not into organized religion, but I still agree with many of his points. At least he won't walk us into ww3 because of the book of revelations, like everyone else wants to do.



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 02:50 PM
link   
reply to post by rstregooski
 


Thank you OP for the great work. I hope you can update it for us.

One thing I know about statistics is that they can be fudged and it is obvious the MSM polls are being very creative with what they are reporting. In other words, they are lying through their teeth.



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 02:54 PM
link   
reply to post by rstregooski
 

Great job bud! S & F! I will be sharing this with as many people as I can to show them the media blackout of Dr. Paul.



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 03:17 PM
link   
reply to post by KJV1611
 


Don't bother sharing it with dailypaul.com. I already did.



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 03:17 PM
link   
reply to post by rstregooski
 


Great bit of data crunching this should be added to one of Ron Paul's adds send it to the super pac, Oh and the names you gave them were worth the read alone as others have mentioned.

If ATS has so many Ron Paul supporters why don't you collaborate and make adds and marketing promos and help the guy out if you don't MSM isn't gonna do it and show support at home and work spread the word and make this happen make America the greatest place on earth again.

Great work
edit on 21-1-2012 by GreatScot because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 03:19 PM
link   
I just did this and got a much stronger result for Newt Gingrich. Could the last day or so boost him that much?

I also copied the links to my results to my Facebook page. People need to see this.



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 03:25 PM
link   
reply to post by AwakeinNM
 


Maybe he did have a very strong showing at the last debate, and all the extra media attention because of all the gossip about his affair and remarks to his ex wife that he wanted an open relationship.

They do say their is no such thing as negative press and people also love the tabloid seedy side of news so the results would have swelled in Newts favour in a positive manner or not.



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 03:28 PM
link   
I don't know if I anyone mentioned this in this thread yet, but I had a thought:

I think part of the reason Ron Paul is skewing high is because he has a much younger base than the other candidates. Many more young people than old are online. This may also explain why Romney has such mediocre interest - his geriatric base doesn't give a crap about the internets.

And a theory on why these two have their respective followers:

Ron Paul's foreign policy is very much anti-war/anti interventionist, which attracts the idealistic youth mindset, and the rest of us who know that his foreign policy is the right path to take. Not that there aren't flaws with it, but it is in spirit the right path.

Romney on the other hand, has a "Kill em all, let God sort em out" foreign policy, which resonates with the WW2, Korea, Vietnam era demographic. --Not the people who actually fought in those wars, but the people who were exposed to the war propaganda of those times--. These voters are still stuck in the mindset that everyone is out to get us and we need to kill these bastards before the commies overrun the planet. They are still programmed to receive the propaganda and they eat it up hungrily.

Hopefully I don't derail this thread too much, but this is my analysis of the search results. Thoughts?



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 03:29 PM
link   
Another Comparison

uk.reuters.com...

sorry mister Huntsman,,,

it's a Kissenger thing,

payback for Vietnam.


-----------------------------------AMERICA CAPITULATES---------------------

( Cease to resist an opponent or an unwelcome demand; surrender )


Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and 2012 Republican presidential candidate Jon Huntsman discuss the trajectory of relations between the U.S. and China.


uk.reuters.com...
uk.reuters.com...

Huntsman ask's "Is China ready too lead",, China won because they were better "long term thinkers", Americans only good for short term thinking.




Me.
edit on 15-6-2011 by BobAthome because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 03:31 PM
link   
reply to post by spacekc929
 


I particularly like the "Get off my lawn!" part



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 03:53 PM
link   
reply to post by AwakeinNM
 


That's a very fair conclusion, it would appear that Ron Paul the oldest person in running is attracting a very large following from young people all over the world he is the one speaking to us not at us and he certainly the only one who would speaks for us.

The internet in my opinion is being attacked by government for this reason they want to make the internet main stream like T.V.



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 03:54 PM
link   
Great thread, OP!
Will share with as many as I can! Hopefully some RP supporters can get over the idea of voting for someone else just because they think he's 'unelectable'.



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 04:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by BobAthome
Another Comparison

uk.reuters.com...

sorry mister Huntsman,,,

it's a Kissenger thing,

payback for Vietnam.


-----------------------------------AMERICA CAPITULATES---------------------

( Cease to resist an opponent or an unwelcome demand; surrender )


Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and 2012 Republican presidential candidate Jon Huntsman discuss the trajectory of relations between the U.S. and China.


uk.reuters.com...
uk.reuters.com...

Huntsman ask's "Is China ready too lead",, China won because they were better "long term thinkers", Americans only good for short term thinking.




Me.
edit on 15-6-2011 by BobAthome because: (no reason given)


So if Huntsman now has supported the Romney Campaign,,
does that mean that China gets a "there BETTER, than the U.S,,"
treatment as well???
After all they are better than Americans
because they have such an Ancient Long Term Culture,,

so that make's there way better,, ??

me.



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 04:16 PM
link   
reply to post by rstregooski
 


should tell you elections are semi-rigged.

They rig elections when an "outsider" gets popular. They'll never let us have a elected president that isn't one of the nwo selected puppets. That's why obama is there. He's a elected puppet used to appease that sheeple into thinking they have real choice.

Nope. Just more sematic/mind games,predictive programming psyops, and other manipulation. They are not going to let a cattle come up and start ruining thier oligarchal marxist war machine. No not when they are still in charge and making "laws". They want us to fight them. So they can turn the US into "East china Soviet Socialist Serfdom".

People are still too trusting of the criminal power structure here. They honestly think TPTB will let them have a seat at the table if they play ball with them.Yeah you keep thinking that. They'll imprison,gas,sterilize you when it has become convient for them. Thier marxist global terrorists. What do you expect from them? A pie? Some roses? Chocolate?



posted on Jan, 21 2012 @ 05:14 PM
link   
Interesting, very interesting. Looks to be trending VERY well.





new topics

top topics



 
88
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join