Originally posted by Futurcrat1
Good point. Thanks for the heads up, friend.
I've only been on ATS a week now, so I'm still getting used to it.
Wow you've made 128 posts in a week? That's a pretty good clip! Welcome
to ATS.
There are a number of problems with the HAARP type theories related to Fukushima. The biggest problem is, that even if there was no HAARP, the
location where the earthquake originated is known to be seismically active, so there would have been an earthquake there sooner or later anyway.
HAARP is too far to have done it, and claims it has a range that far regarding earthquakes don't hold up to scrutiny. If there were any closer HAARP
facilities, what were they? What's the evidence/motivation? A conspiracy theory does need some facts to go on.
I think there's a real conspiracy happening in Fukushima that has nothing to do with HAARP. It's about how TEPCO managed to build a nuclear reactor
in a fault zone, and then ignored the advice of its own scientists and engineers of the tsunami threat, before the disaster. Then after the disaster
there was a conspiracy by both TEPCO and the Japanese government to downplay the severity of the disaster, as evidenced by the long delay in upgrading
the IAEA rating of the accident severity and other factors. And the latest conspiracy is that TEPCO isn't being held responsible for the radioactive
contamination as much as they should be.
So there are plenty of real conspiracies related to Fukushima, if you look for real evidence. We don't need to invent any that have no real evidence,
like the HAARP conspiracy claims.
