Who's next in the war on terrorism?

Whose next? Well, if we really were concerned about ending terror, heres my wish list of coutnries to hit to end it all.

1. Israel. They are about 80% of the reason terrorists aretrying to hit us. Since they suppport terror of thier own, i say hit them Then maybe no more need for those nasty checkpoints at the airport.
2. Saudi Arabia. backtsabbing crooked bastards. nad of course, where the vast majority or terrorist funding, as well as terrorists, spring from. (look at suspected 9/11 hijacker list......notic 15 of the 19 were SAUDI nationals? didnt see any iraqis on there, or syrians for that matter) My time in Saudi taught me the Al Sauds were crooked, lying, backstabbing bastards, who pat u with oine hand as the other with the dagger creeps behind your back. remeber khobar tower bombings? when clinton told them he wanted thier cooperation for an investigation into the matter, the saudis flat out said # off and die. same attitude in the bombing of the cole.
3.France and germany. Not being a smart ass, and not because they opposed bush in the war, but because they have many active terrorist cells that pretty much get ignored by the govornments. and Germanys AG Chemie company was caught red handed selling nasty # to Iraq during the first gulf war.

Ultimately tho, if u really wanna kill terror, u need to take out the terrorists reasons ( Israel) and thier lifeblood and finding (saudi). Anything else is just chsing spider farts.

I used to think for sure it was going to be syria but now im having my doubts I think it might be north korea they may have the 4th largest army in the world I hear at this point but I myself think it would be the most logical before they become more of a threat and after what i've heard lately I have my doubts but I think it would be the most logical target and there's no doubt to me that the president will chose another country to invade

If neither side ever budges, the terror will never stop.
Do we Really want to stop terror? We know what we have to do to stop it. But is the sacrifice too much?

Is it better to defuse a situation, or let it explode?
What's more important - money and power, or life?

Defending your beliefs and dying, or surviving in servitude? That is what the terrorist thinks. Can you fight that mindset? You can, but it will never end.

North Korea is a tightly controlled regime, not a vast and elusive terror group. Not to mention North Korea is only a terrorist to it's own people. They rape the land and the people of a future by the radicalization of their paranoid policies. They are Cold War victims. They are still suffering from the effects of the Red Scare. It is the Jong Family that has made matters worse. They are the problem and they are the one's we have a problem with, not North Korea as a whole. So to say that we need to go to war is stupid.

Since Kim Jong Il isn't like Saddam, and is known to travel, then we can just arrest him at the next meeting he has with other diplomats and politicans. The remaining people in his regime will be given two steps to take, the step to exile or the steps that Sloby Milosy took. They will bow down to the exile and be glad that they where let off for their crimes. If they are dumb and resist these measures then they will see the same fate as the Serbian war criminals.

Then again that is how I would do it. The way I would want it done would be too peaceful and cheap for the corruptors of this earth. No money and power can be obtained in the ways I would carry it out. Nothing without power and money is worth the time and sanity of the corruptors. For it is they who are greedy and gluttonous. The pigs of the world are all gathered in one organization of NWO Plotters. They are the tyrannts, drug dealers, oppressors, corruptors, liars, thugs, demons, and traitors among us. They are the bad. They make me wan't to..........













Pardon me.